Clarence Thomas Corners Attorney In Trump Ballot Case By Asking For Disqualification Examples | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Daniel Chaitin.

    Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas clashed on Thursday with a lawyer who argued in favor of Colorado removing former President Donald Trump from the primary ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, an insurrection clause dating back to the Civil War.

    Jason Murray, the attorney who appeared on behalf of Colorado voters challenging Trump's eligibility over his actions leading up to the U.S. Capitol breach on January 6, 2021, struggled to come up with instances of national candidates being disqualified by states when pressed by the justice.

    Thomas asked Murray if he had any "contemporaneous examples," which the justice qualified as being "shortly after the adoption of the 14th Amendment, where the states disqualified national candidates - not its own candidates."

    Murray referred to one instance, pertaining to an 1868 congressional election in Georgia, and said he thought it was "not surprising that there are few examples" because at that time, "candidates were either write-in or they were party ballots, so the states didn't run the ballots in the same way and there wouldn't have been a process for determining before an election whether a candidate was qualified unlike the processes that we have now."

    Thomas countered by saying that during the Reconstruction era, there would still be a "plethora of Confederates still around" who might run for state or national offices, suggesting there would be "a few examples of national candidates being disqualified, if your reading is correct."

    Murray contended that "certainly" there were national candidates "disqualified by Congress refusing to seat them," to which Thomas shot back by reminding the lawyer that they were talking about states disqualifying national candidates.

    "Other than the example I gave, no, but again, your honor, that's not surprising because there wouldn't have been - states certainly wouldn't have the authority to remove a sitting federal officer," Murray said.

    As the exchange continued, Thomas explored the purpose of Section 3, saying the clause sought to address the concern that "former Confederate states would continue being bad actors and the effort was to prevent them from doing this."

    Thomas posited that the thinking behind Section 3 was not "authorizing the South to disqualify national candidates," and yet he surmised that the idea underlies the argument being made by Murray to keep Trump off the ballot. He again pressed Murray for examples.

HbAD0

    Murray said historians filed briefs in support of his case making the point that "the idea of the 14th Amendment was that both states and the federal government would ensure rights and that if states failed to do so, the federal government certainly would also step in."

    The lawyer went on to repeat that the reason why there are not more examples was because "elections worked differently" in the 19th century. "States have a background power under Article II in the 10th Amendment to run presidential elections," Murray said, adding that they did not "use that power to police ballot access until about the 1890s" when "everyone had received amnesty and these issues had become moot."

poll#201
Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure
439 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#147
Do you consider Election Integrity an issue of some real importance, or just another conspiracy theory interfering with Democratic Socialist political hegemony?
  No, complete access to everyone voting, even in a willy nilly manner, is more important than getting it right by limiting access to those that would commit Voter Fraud.
  Yes, the most inalienable right of real citizens of this Democratic Republic is the Right to Vote, and that right shall remain sacrosanct for perpetuity.
  Again, I don't vote and I don't care.
730 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#206
In stripping away the heavy varnish of fakery by the heavy handed Corrupt Corporate Media; in taking a true view of what is real, right now with clear open eyes: How do you see this 46th President of these States United; what is your visceral first impression of Joe Biden after nearly 3 years on the job?
  A good man, wise and kind
  The Socialist President
  A president in praise of his son
  The Non Patriot President
  A successful president
  The Idiot President
  A knowledgeable president
  A corrupt president
  A perfect leader of the Democratic Socialist party
  The man is married to a "Doctor"
578 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#204
After nearly 8 months of the United States House of Representatives' Oversight Committee hearings, House Speaker Mike Johnson is pursuing an Impeachment Inquiry into the strong allegations of Bribery, Influence Peddling, Money laundering and possible Treason regarding the Biden Family Shell Corporations' business dealings with foreign nations that are adversarial to our survival: Is it prudent and wise for the Republican controlled U.S. House to investigate this Democratic Socialist President?
  No, Democratics should never be investigated because they are so superior to their Republican counterparts, and care so much more.
  Yes, in a Constitutional Republic, bound by the Rule of Law, no one is above the law, and that law must be applied evenly.
  Not sure ... Now, what got all this started?
296 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comment

KLOM said:
( February 16th, 2024 @ 7:57 am )
 
Biden does not have the best interest of the American people in mind when making any decision. He sold us out and is somehow being blackmailed, in my opinion.



Sunny Hostin Says She Still Deserves Reparations After Discovering Her Ancestors Were Slave Owners Daily Wire, News Services, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Government, Op-Ed & Politics, State and Federal All Babylon Bee Articles Will Be Delayed As The Writers Are Out Panic-Buying Flowers For Valentine’s Day

HbAD1

 
Back to Top