New study: countries with strict lockdowns had worse health and economic results

Latest Polls (view all)

Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?

98.86% No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.

1.14% Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.

0% "What, me worry" if elections are rigged?

Click Here to Vote
88 Vote(s)

View all Polls

New study: countries with strict lockdowns had worse health and economic results

Published: Friday, March 8th, 2024 @ 9:56 am
By: John Steed ( More Entries )

A new academic study prepared by two professors at Lund Univeristy in Sweden and published in the Economic Affairs Journal has shown that countries using stricter lockdowns in dealing with the Covid 19 pandemic had worse results, both in terms of health and of economic impact than countries with lighter or no lockdowns. The study compared the number of excessive deaths in each country during the pandemic, and found that there were more excess deaths in countries with strict lockdowns than in countries with no or lesser lockdowns. It also compared changes in GDP and found that countries with lighter lockdowns fared better economicly as well.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ecaf.12611

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/covid-19-lockdowns-had-high-health-economic-costs-swedish-study

Go Back

Login to Leave a Comment

Comments

Concerned Taxpayer said:

( March 10th, 2024 @ 2:39 pm )

Lockdowns were the ChiCom approach to Covid, which the ChiCom dominated WHO recommended to other countries. That fool Fauci advocated that totalitarian crap here. Faucism is just another way to say Fascism. Before the ChiCom stooge took over the WHO, its pandemic response was based on herd immunity, not lockdowns, but the ChiCom stooge Tedros changed all that. Now the facts show the ChiComs were wrong and the pre-ChiCom WHO had been right.

This new WHO pandemic treaty is nothing but a ChiCom power grab. If that blinkered fool Biden signs it, the states should pass laws saying they do not accept it as binding on them.

Rino Hunter said:

( March 9th, 2024 @ 3:31 pm )

With a totalitarian World Health Organization trying to impose a "treaty" that is a massive powergrab, these results should be a wakeup call. The WHO has become little more than a wholly owned subsidiary of the ChiComs, with its ChiCom recruited and backed director general Tedros having no medical experience in his background as Foreign Minister of Ethiopia. The WHO backed the Chinese lockdown strategy which was a disaster. We do not need to give them any more control.

US House passes Laken Riley Act to mandate DHS detain criminal illegal aliens

Rant & Rave, Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics

Stacked Against, Part Two: Charge stacking and plea bargains in North Carolina – what you need to know