|
Befuddled: You're asking some great questions. I'm having a hard time putting this together also. The Superintendent started the grant process in 2023. By November 2023 it was on the agenda to move forward, and the board voted to present the proposal to the County Commission. That proposal breezed through 8 to 1 with Mr. Hickman voting against it. The County Commission knocked it through with a familiar 5 to 2 cram. At that time, it was assumed that BCS owned all the land.
By the December 18, 2024 School Board Emergency Closed Session meeting, the Board came back into open session whereupon chairman Allen made a motion seconded by Mr. Shreve to authorize the attorney to enter negotiations with the City of Washington for a Temporary Construction Easement including provisions about the 4 acres owned by the City of Washington. This included the proposals for trading Kugler Field, or trading P.S. Jones Park for the 4 acres. So, the shakedown was begun sometime before this. There was another School Board Emergency Closed Session on January 10, 2025. Coming back into open session Chairman Allen made a motion seconded by Mr. Shreve to offer the City of Washington two options. Option 1. Purchase the 4 acres for $500,000. Option 2. Offer P.S. Jones Memorial Park to the City of Washington as a land swap. The Board offer provided for letting the County Commissioners choose. From my conversations with a Board member, there seemed to be several meetings during this time with certain members of each board that were supposedly reporting back to the other members. From the School Board end, I seriously doubt if anyone really knows other than the Chairman and the Superintendent. It's probably a similar situation on the other boards too. It's all kind of murky with no clear trail. During this end of proceedings, the major players seem to be the Superintendent, the School Board Chairman, the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners, the County Manager and I'm really not clear about who was leading the shakedown from the City of Washington. I've put all this together by referring to my own notes, checking the minutes, and conversations I've had with a School Board member (one I can trust). If anyone has it more clear than I do, I welcome the input. There really should be more light on all of this. They owe it to the public. But I suppose that would be too embarrassing. |
|
Hood: I was most confused as to why the School Administration, in tandem with the Center-Left /Left Coalition of the Beaufort County Commission, thought it wise to waste 1/2 million of the public's money for land that could have been purchased by a mere trade of 4 acres for City of Washington land of 4 acres county land.
Of course, if the school administration had been rudimentary wise enough to order a title search for that land they did not own, none of this would have been an issue. Concerned Taxpayer: Ditto. Especially the scene of Toto as hero. The administration of our public schools is a clustered mess, to state it in the kindest of terms. |
|
The Big Cheese would not negotiate with the City to get the land. He did not want the land. If he did not get the land, the shop and service complex area would be used for the stormwater pond. He wanted a new shop and service area at a cost of at least 5 million dollars.
This all looks funny and confusing because the Big Cheese wanted it to be odd and confusing. |
|
Befuddled, you have a very good point. That boondoggle over the land ownership clearly illustrates the poor management we have in our county schools, and that poor management was just rewarded, from what I'm told, by a big raise and an extension of his contract. I also wonder where the School Board attorney was in all this. Since he he way off in Durham, I suspect they didn't even bother to bring him in on it. Was Cheeseman playing both attorney and real estate appraiser in this farce, neither of which he is qualified or licensed for?
Our school system reminds me of that scene toward the end of the Wizard of Oz, only this time when the dog Toto rips away the curtain, it is Cheeseman in the booth operating the controls of the great and powerful school board. |
|
VZ:
Do you hav a timeline & a Who's Who, of what went down th moment after th staff at the BoardofEducation were told:"Hey u dont own th 9acs that is in your NewSchool BuildingPlan." Did Cheeseman go to th SchoolBoard members & ask what should we do abt this? Or did he skip them & go straight to th CityManager, skipping th CityCouncil as well? Then did th CityManager&Cheeseman contact the CountyManager & discuss what to do, skipping th CountyCommissioners at this time too? When Cheeseman was meeting w th CityManager,& asked What is th land worth in $$, did he say $1million? And then did Cheeseman say What abt 1/2 of it? Then did th CityManagr independently,& exclusive of the CityCouncil quote to Cheeseman $500,000, to which Cheeseman sd, Okay if I can get th 4 Useful Idiots to say yes? And then, w nothin more than these 3 bureaucrats agreeing,did Cheeseman go to th CommissionerMeeting & say, Well th CityManager says $500,000, to which th 4 sd, "Tell me NO more, LET's DO THIS ASAP." |
|
Van Zant: The only thing a voting system can partially fix is to set a better environment to restrict corruption.
Corruption from the special interest camps; corruption from sects of most unknowledgeable voters; corruption in bureaucrats, who do not know their place, and summarily manhandle weak politicians. With better elected politicians, probably smarter in scope, they could dispense of most of these forms of corruption; the easiest of which is to fire the bureaucrats, for such cause as this, who do not know their place in a governing hierarchy. |
|
Stan: Could be. I'm no fan of district elections either. But I wonder if a voting system can fix character issues.
Befuddled: Concerning the new school building project, all but one school board member rushed into that as hard as they could, eager to spend that "free" money. |
View All Comments
Having said that, and as I recognize that one cannot mention everything within the real confines of this sorry event, top to bottom, let me remind ever reader here of two things:
1. Commissioners Richardson and Deatherage voted against every bad decision made by the inept Beaufort County School Board, and we voted against every fool pledged move made, in the majority, by the Beaufort County Commissioners' Center-Left /Left Coalition.
2. Since early February, 2025, I have repeatedly asked for a copy of the phantom title search (in finite detail) that was alleged to be eventually completed (like closing the barn door after the prized mare had "runnoft") for the Four Acre Debacle, and I have received nothing from either governing board.
Until I receive that copy of that phantom title search (in finite detail) that was alleged completed for the Four Acre Debacle that I have requested so many months past, I will NOT VOTE for in favor of any request by the Beaufort County School Board.
As a 7 term county commissioner of some ability and much knowledge, and as the Taxing Authority of all Beaufort County's tax paying citizens, I will not support abject incompetence by wasting my constituents' vote toward such, as is signified by this politicized measure of informational denial to this elected representative of my many wise and Good constituents that obviously agree with how I have governed in a wise and honest manner all these may decades.
There is a statement that "truth dies in darkness." I would rather profess that truth lives in sunlight.