News From New London | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Jon Guze, who is the Director of Legal Studies for the John Locke Foundation.

    Despite being upheld by the US Supreme Court in 2005 as a legitimate exercise of eminent domain, the decision by the City of New London, CT, to take some of its citizens' homes and give the land on which they stood to a private developer was a source of widespread outrage at the time. And even now, ten years later, the City is still finding it difficult to put the negative publicity and the lingering bad feelings behind it and "move forward."

    On March 20th, The New London Day reported:

    After years of stalled development and an uncertain future for the Fort Trumbull neighborhood, the City announced...that a Pennsylvania company is proposing a 104-unit, $18.4 million residential development on the peninsula.

    It then went on to remind its readers:

    In 2000, the City Council approved a Municipal Development Plan for Fort Trumbull....Under the plan, nearly all the buildings in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood were leveled to make way for new multiuse developments.

    Some properties were taken by eminent domain and some of the owners fought the takings, which sparked a legal debate that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2005, the court ruled in Kelo v. City of New London that the city had the right to use eminent domain powers to take property for the city's economic development purposes.

    The paper noted, with perhaps a bit of understated irony, that, if the announced project were actually to be built, it would be the first new construction in Fort Trumbull since the approval of the development plan in 2000. Adding to the irony, the paper also noted that the project would be built entirely "on land that was once the Naval Undersea Warfare Center site" rather than on the land that had been taken from its owners under Kelo. As The Day's readers would know only too well, apart from a colony of feral cats, that land has remained vacant ever since the City evicted Susette Kelo and her fellow plaintiffs and demolished their homes.

    More recently, on March 31st, The Day reported another announcement by the City, this time about a proposal to make use of some, at least, of the seized property:

    The vacant parcel of land at the corner of Trumbull and East streets where Suzette Kelo's little pink house once stood could be set aside as a permanent public park recognizing the residents whose homes in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood were taken by the city's use of eminent domain powers more than a decade ago.

    In his State of the City address Tuesday evening, Mayor Daryl Justin Finizio announced that he and the Renaissance City Development Association have reached an agreement that would remove Kelo's former property from consideration for any future development. "It is my personal hope that this park will serve as a memorial to all those adversely effected by the city's use of eminent domain." Finizio said.

    The report in The Day did not indicate how much comfort, if any, the proposed memorial would give Ms. Kelo and her former neighbors, nor did it provide any information about what would happen to the cats.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




John Locke Foundation: Prudent Policy / Impeccable Research - Volume XCIV John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Supreme Court Ruling on Pot Highlights Partisan Divide


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Pope Francis lambasted leftist gender ideology during an address this week, warning that it presented an extreme danger to mankind.
amnesty would just encourage more illegal aliens to storm our borders
The Christmas candy was barely off the shelves when the Valentine’s candy appeared. Red and pink hearts with caramel and nut-filled chocolate goodness caught our eye. We are reminded of how we love love. Young love, especially.
far left sugar daddy has also funded anti-Israel groups and politicians in US
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
America needs to wake up and get its priorities right
Former President Donald Trump suggested this week that if he becomes president again, he might allow Prince Harry to be deported.
It's a New Year, which means it's time to make resolutions — even for prominent evangelical leaders. The Babylon Bee asked the following well-known figures in the faith what they hope to accomplish in 2024:
Vice President Kamala Harris will visit a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic, reportedly the first time a president or vice president has visited an abortion facility.

HbAD1

An eight-mile stretch of the Blue Ridge Parkway near Asheville has been temporarily closed due to a string of “human and bear interactions,” the National Parks Service announced.
University of Wisconsin tried to punish conservatives for the fact that liberals regularly commit crimes to silence opposition
most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration
Come from behind by GOP candidate is a blueprint to 2024
Biden spending and energy policies to blame
Tuberculosis carried by illegal invaders has already infected Texas cattle
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said this week that the only campaign promise President Joe Biden has delivered on as president is the complete dismantling of the U.S. southern border.
Hamas is reeling after losing two of their most cherished leaders on the same day: military commander Saleh al-Arouri, and Harvard President Claudine Gay.

HbAD2

 
Back to Top