Would The Fair Tax Kill Obamacare? | Beaufort County Now | I have never been a fan of the Fair Tax, a proposal to abolish the income tax and substitute a national sales tax. My opposition has nothing to do with the merits of a national sales tax as opposed to an income tax per se. Clearly, as an economist, I agree that the proper and most efficient tax... | John Locke Foundation,Roy Cordato,Fair Tax,Obamacare,income tax,national sales tax,economy

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Would The Fair Tax Kill Obamacare?

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Dr. Roy Cordato, who is Vice President for Research and resident scholar for the John Locke Foundation.

1. Would the Fair Tax Kill Obamacare?


    I have never been a fan of the Fair Tax, a proposal to abolish the income tax and substitute a national sales tax. My opposition has nothing to do with the merits of a national sales tax as opposed to an income tax per se. Clearly, as an economist, I agree that the proper and most efficient tax base is consumption, not income which is consumption plus saving. My concern has always been that it would be impossible to completely eliminate both the income tax and the possibility of bringing it back at some point in the future. In other words, by creating an infrastructure for a new national tax, we could end up, in the long run, with both. Instead, I have supported converting the current income tax into a consumption tax by eliminating savings from the tax base, making all savings deductible and flattening the rate.

    But while the proposal I like, typically called a consumed income tax, would in principal be equivalent to the Fair Tax in its impact on the economy, there is one advantage that the Fair Tax would have that could, depending what ultimately happens with Obamacare, change my thinking. By eliminating the income tax and the IRS, you would also be eliminating the enforcement mechanism for Obamacare's individual mandate.

    Under the Affordable Care Act — Obamacare — everyone who is not receiving health insurance as part of his employment benefits package or a government program like Medicare or Medicaid is required to purchase a federally approved health insurance plan. The IRS through the income tax system enforces this "individual mandate."

    Every year when a person files his tax return he must show proof that during that year he was covered by a health insurance plan that meets all of the requirements of Obamacare. If the tax filer is not insured the IRS levies a penalty, and it is collected by reducing the uninsured taxpayer's refund. It is generally recognized that the individual mandate is essential to the operation of Obamcare. It is how healthy, low cost people are forced into the risk pool, which in turn subsidizes higher cost unhealthy individuals, particularly those with preexisting conditions.

    The constitutionality of the individual mandate ended up being based on this enforcement mechanism. Chief Justice John Roberts was the deciding vote in this case and he determined that the penalty collected by the IRS was not a fine at all but a tax. Ultimately this was because it operated through the income tax system. If it were levied directly on the non-compliant citizen like, for example, a fine for not complying with an EPA regulation or even speeding, then it would no longer be a tax and Obamacare would lose its constitutional status.

    In this regard, the advantage that a Fair tax would have over a consumed income tax is that it would abolish the existing income tax and the IRS. In doing so, it would also be abolishing the mechanism for enforcing Obamacare's individual mandate. This would mean that a new enforcement mechanism that could pass constitutional muster as a tax rather than a fine would have to not only be devised but would have to pass Congress as an amendment to the original Affordable Care Act. This would be extremely unlikely, particularly with any Congress that would pass a Fair Tax in the first place.

    If my assessment is correct, the implementation of a Fair Tax could accomplish something that two Supreme Court cases and the election of Republican majorities in both houses of congress has not — the effective repeal of Obamacare.

    Does this mean that I have changed my mind on the merits of a national sales tax vs. a flat rate consumed income tax? Not necessarily, but the reality of using tax reform to kill two birds with one stone makes, in my mind, a properly implemented sales tax at the national level more appealing than it once was.

2. Ozone Report


    The 2015 ozone season began on April 1 and, as I have been doing since this newsletter was started, each week during the ozone season this newsletter will report how many, if any, high ozone days have been experienced throughout the state during the previous week, where they were experienced, and how many have been recorded during the entire season to date. (Note: ground level ozone, which is what we are reporting on, is often called "smog.") According to current EPA standards, a region or county experiences a high ozone day if a monitor in that area registers the amount of ozone in the air as 76 parts per billion (ppb) or greater. The official ozone season will end on October 31. All reported data is preliminary and issued by the North Carolina Division of Air Quality, which is part of the state's Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Thus far this season there have been 5 high ozone days recorded on any of the state's 42 monitors. Three occurred on June 25 and two on August 5.

    The table below shows all of the North Carolina's ozone monitors and the high readings on those monitors for each day of the 7-day period, August 24-August 30.






Comments

( September 7th, 2015 @ 4:28 am )
 
Affordable Health Care is in its first phase as now all US citizens have the right to health insurance. Insurance is THE SHARING OF RISKS among all who are covered. It is opposed by the Health Insurance Industry which could previously deny coverage to one with high and known risks. That boosted their profits.

All Industrialized Nations which have a national healthcare system move to cap costs by Doctors / Big Pharma / Hospitals / suing lawyers so that high profits from medicine are not so high. We should all be aware that health costs have risen in the last 20 years at 3-5 times inflation. That is not right when profits rule over humane physicians. Blue Cross / Blue Shield was formed by doctors who wanted to be assured of getting paid for their services. Medicine had become a high profit road to wealth over the country doctor ministering to his patients in exchange for whatever they could afford to give---even pigs and chickens!

NC has refused Medicaid Funds in escrow since we have paid it in SS taxes. That is why the hospital at Belhaven and other rural locations are gone. Fewer people spread over larger rural areas is not PROFITABLE!!!! I am confident some better thinking --- rather than such "stinkin thinkin" can find solutions for compassion over profits . . .
( September 6th, 2015 @ 5:39 pm )
 
Sir I enjoyed you comments on the Fairtax, very thoughtful ones. I had not thought of the Fairtax in relation to the ACM and yes the ACM tax would be affected by the amendments of the Tax Code eliminating the IRS and its tax collection duties. So even the ACM ta would still exist, there would not be any mechanism to gather information and collect it. Your fears of having both an Income tax or Vat tax plus the Fairtax are reasonable but not likely because first because the law implementing the Income tax and the IRS is repealed by the Fairtax and once we go even one year without the income tax I cannot imagine any one wanting it back, but if the companion bill repealing the XV1 Amendment is not passed in seven years then the Fairtax is automatically repealed.



Governor McCrory Encourages Innovation and Entrepreneurship Through Ride-Sharing Legislation John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics All Lives Matter


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Governor Roy Cooper today announced the establishment of a COVID-19 vaccination center in North Carolina, in partnership with the federal government.
Lawmakers in the General Assembly have filed a series of bills that would exempt counties they represent from some or all of Gov. Roy Cooper’s COVID restrictions.
How the Left plans to impose the Green New Deal
Few things have been more disturbing than the politicization of our health care by leftists imposing their racialist agenda on innocent and vulnerable Americans.
Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) went on CNN on Tuesday to blast Donald Trump for the CPAC speech he gave this past weekend, claiming that he was “really bored” during it because it was like many of the others the former president had previously given.
Gov. Roy Cooper’s 11th-hour veto of a school reopening bill Friday isn’t sitting well with nearly half of North Carolina likely voters, a Civitas Flash Poll shows.
On Tuesday, as he was leaving the room with Vice President Kamala Harris, President Biden was asked by reporters whether there was a crisis at the southern border of the United States.

HbAD1

 
Back to Top