Why most Liberals are both vision and hearing impaired - Humor or Serious | Eastern North Carolina Now

    I realize that this may be treading on sacred ground, but if you bear with me you may see my point. It seems that the Liberals hear one thing but think they hear something else, they see one thing but think they see something else.It is not a medical condition but a state of mind. I realize that it is not only a Liberal trait, but it seems to me that they are so locked in their denial that they are unable to step back and try to look beyond their preconceived bias against President Trump. To a lesser degree the conservatives felt the same towards President Obama.

   I have for a long time known that beauty was in the eye of the beholder. I know this because every time I tried to draw something in art class, Miss. May Klutzz (no kidding, that was her real name) would remind me of that. Then she would explain in ever so much detail:

The first person to use it in the form we know today ("beauty is in the eye of the beholder") was an author called Margaret Wolfe Hungerford. She included the phrase in her book "Molly Bawn. (1878) Molly Bawn the story of a frivolous, petulant Irish girl, a flirt, who arouses her lover's jealousy and naively ignores social conventions. .

Bass High School Art Teacher Atlanta, Georgia
    I had no idea at the time that she was just trying to be gentle in her criticism of my work of art. I had no interest in Art, I took the course, as well as typing because that is where the girls were. I did not have enough guts to take Home Economics. No respectable greaser would survive that ribbing from his classmates.

    Anyway, that was where I learned that you could be vision impaired and still have 20/20 vision. It meant that you saw things through a different set of eyes depending on your personal biases. For the record, Miss Klutzz was a certified avant-guarde eccentric. She had been teaching at Bass High since at least 1947 according to the memories comments on our Facebook page. To say she had flair would be an understatement. I think I can safely say she was a Liberal as much as you could be in 1958. At the very least she was a feminist to the core. That is why it was strange that she did not appreciate my abstract approach to art.

    Next up is the hearing impairment. As a person who suffers from that malady, I can attest that you do not always hear what was said clearly. You learn to adapt by looking carefully at the person speaking and then either nodding you head up and down or side to side. I think I could be considered an expert on the subject because I made 100% on the Ten-signs-of-hearing test and I am too cheap (not vain) to buy hearing aids.But that is a medical problem. I am talking about the version of hearing only what you want to hear. This is all based on your interpretation of what you think they said.

    So you might want to trust my judgement on this Seeing and Hearing problems with Liberals. When you have already made up you mind that someone is dumb or an ignoramus, it should be no surprise that when you hear his name you automatically revert to the "Stupid is as Stupid Does" mantra. Never mind that Donald Trump has made billions of dollars dealing with some of the smartest people in the world. It is even remotely possible that he has just been "DUMB GUMP LUCKY" like Forrest was?

In a way, the joke’s on the Republican Party: After decades of masquerading as the “stupid party,” that’s what it has become. But if an unapologetic ignoramus wins the presidency, the consequences will be no laughing matter. New York Times -July 31, 2016

   For example, I want you to quickly read the following lines quickly several times:

DONALD TRUMP, DONALD TRUMP, DONALD TRUMP
FORREST GUMP, FORREST GUMP, FORREST GUMP
DONALD TRUMP, DONALD TRUMP, DONALD TRUMP
FORREST GUMP, FORREST GUMP, FORREST GUMP
DONALD TRUMP, DONALD TRUMP, DONALD TRUMP
FORREST GUMP, FORREST GUMP, FORREST GUMP
    Can you see how a confused Liberal would misunderstand the difference between Donald Trump and Forrest Gump. They already have a pre-determined locked in opinion. The hear one thing but think they hear something else.

    I think they may have the same problem with their sight. I think you will agree that beauty (or stupid is as stupid does) is in the eye of the beholder for a Liberal as well. What they see is what they want to see and they are not looking for beauty anywhere in the current environment. Here is an example of that.

Click here to see an example of poor Liberal Vision

    That's all I have to say about that. To carry the example a bit further,here is another little test. Read this quickly and you may see how it is easy to get confused.

BOBBY TONY, BOBBY TONY
BONY MARONIE, BONY MARONIE
BOBBY TONY, BOBBY TONY
BONY MARONIE, BONY MARONIE




   I doubt any Liberals got this far in the article and if they did I think I can almost guarantee that they are not laughing. You see most Liberals don't have a sense of Humor or Funny Bone. It was organically removed when they had that first Caffè Latte Grande at Starbucks.