Medicaid Work Rules are Needed | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: This article appeared on John Hood's daily column in the Carolina Journal, which, because of Author / Publisher Hood, is linked to the John Locke Foundation.

    If government gives you a cash handout or a "free" service and you are capable of working, studying, or providing service to the community in exchange for your public assistance, should you be obligated to do so?

    Most conservatives say yes. Most progressives say no. Most Americans agree with the conservatives on this, much to the dismay of the progressives.

    This is not a theoretical question here in North Carolina. A couple of years ago, the administration of former Gov. Pat McCrory instituted a requirement that recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - or SNAP, what used to be called food stamps - had to comply with a work requirement as long as they were able-bodied and didn't have dependent children.

    Also a couple of years ago, McCrory and the North Carolina General Assembly fashioned a reform plan to introduce more managed care within the state's Medicaid program. One element of the resulting Medicaid waiver submitted to the federal government was a proposed work requirement for North Carolina recipients - again, for those whose health conditions and caregiving responsibilities would allow it.

    Responding to several applications, including ours, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has just ruled that states can institute Medicaid work requirements. Within hours, Kentucky became the first state to do so.

    There is a robust debate among policy analysts about the efficacy of work mandates. Do they cost to administer than they save in benefits paid over time? How many welfare recipients are truly capable of working? What if jobs are hard to find? What other activities - enrollment in job training, for example, or volunteering - ought to satisfy the requirement?

    These are important questions. But to me, there is a more fundamental principle at stake. If the government is to be in the public-assistance business at all, the strongest case for support involves the aged, the infirm, the disabled, and orphaned children. These are individuals who can't take care of themselves, at least not to a large degree.

    Their relatives ought to be their primary caregivers. That's what family is for. But in cases where family resources and private philanthropy are insufficient, most North Carolinians support not just a temporary safety net but long-term public assistance.

    For able-bodied people who don't fit these categories, most people see government's proper role as much more limited. Whatever temporary assistance might be rendered, they should be moved as rapidly as possible into work, self-sufficiency, and self-respect. A combination of time limits and work requirements is necessary to combat welfare dependency, which otherwise saps initiative, unravels families and communities, and creates multi-generational cycles of poverty.

    If work-or-service requirements for able-bodied Medicaid recipients are too hard to define or costly to administer, then that becomes a strong argument not to allow such recipients on Medicaid in the first place - at least not in a free society where government is supposed to be minimized, personal freedom is supposed to be maximized, and personal responsibility is supposed to be the default, not merely an aspiration.

    Medicaid is the primary welfare program in the United States. It is far larger and more expensive than cash assistance, SNAP, or public housing. It is one of the fastest-growing expenses in federal and state budgets. If work requirements don't apply to Medicaid, then the full potential of welfare reform will never be realized.

    Because North Carolina has not liberalized its eligibility standards under the Affordable Care Act, we don't have very many Medicaid recipients who'd be subject to work requirements. Still, as we know, North Carolina Democrats and progressive activists desperately want Medicaid expansion to happen.

    I truly think it would be a prudent decision if they dropped their opposition to work requirements and cooperated with Republicans in devising some sensible rules. That would undercut one of the main arguments conservatives have used, so far successfully, to rebut the special-interest pressure (primarily from hospitals) to expand Medicaid.

    That's what I think the Left should do. That's not what I think the Left will do.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




BREAKING: Indictment Handed Out In Russian Bribery Case Involving Uranium One, Hillary Clinton Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Some Low-Performing Schools Adopt Restart Model, but Many Seem Hesitant to Try


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

President Joe Biden took direct aim at Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas during a recent interview, referring to him simply as “the guy who likes to spend a lot of time on yachts.”
The best way the county and city can help hold down inflation is to resist all tax increases
Pope Francis lambasted leftist gender ideology during an address this week, warning that it presented an extreme danger to mankind.
amnesty would just encourage more illegal aliens to storm our borders
The Christmas candy was barely off the shelves when the Valentine’s candy appeared. Red and pink hearts with caramel and nut-filled chocolate goodness caught our eye. We are reminded of how we love love. Young love, especially.

HbAD1

far left sugar daddy has also funded anti-Israel groups and politicians in US
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
America needs to wake up and get its priorities right
Former President Donald Trump suggested this week that if he becomes president again, he might allow Prince Harry to be deported.
It's a New Year, which means it's time to make resolutions — even for prominent evangelical leaders. The Babylon Bee asked the following well-known figures in the faith what they hope to accomplish in 2024:
Vice President Kamala Harris will visit a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic, reportedly the first time a president or vice president has visited an abortion facility.

HbAD2

An eight-mile stretch of the Blue Ridge Parkway near Asheville has been temporarily closed due to a string of “human and bear interactions,” the National Parks Service announced.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top