Duke Redistricting Event Elevated as Justices Schedule N.C. Arguments | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal, and written by Dan Way, associate editor.

    Attorneys arguing congressional redistricting cases from North Carolina and Maryland say they'll offer U.S. Supreme Court justices an array of legal theories, hoping one will stick and the court will rule extreme partisan redistricting plans unconstitutional.

Redistricting experts (from left) Thomas Wolf, Emmet Bondurant, Michael Kimberly, and Allison Riggs address a Jan. 25 conference on redistricting at Duke University. (CJ photo by Dan Way)

    By chance, the lawyers were speaking Friday at a Common Cause redistricting reform event on the Duke University campus hours after the Supreme Court announced it would hold oral arguments on their cases March 26. They expect a decision in June. The cases have garnered national attention because federal court haven't limited redistricting done for purely partisan gain.

    Many legal observers were surprised when the Supreme Court in 2016 returned a case on partisan gerrymandering from Wisconsin, Gill v. Whitford, to a lower court. The justices said these sorts of cases must be brought one district at a time. The lawsuit is on hold pending the outcome of the North Carolina and Maryland cases.

    More than 300 academics, lawyers, activists, students, and redistricting reform advocates from around the country attended the conference. Participants hoped arguments based on an array of legal principles could sway the court.

    Allison Riggs, who heads the voting rights program at the Southern Coalition for Social Justice in Durham, is the lead counsel on League of Women Voters v. Rucho. That congressional redistricting case was consolidated with Common Cause v. Rucho. The third case the Supreme Court took up is Benesik v. Lamone, a Maryland case.

    Riggs said offering a variety of arguments might work better than coalescing around a single legal point. "At the end of the day, if any of us win, all of us win."


Redistricting experts (from left) Thomas Wolf, Emmet Bondurant, Michael Kimberly, and Allison Riggs address a Jan. 25 conference on redistricting at Duke University. (CJ photo by Dan Way)

    Michael Kimberly, lead counsel in the Maryland case, said the attorneys think using narrow approaches gives them a better chance to succeed.

    The North Carolina cases involve the Republican-led General Assembly deliberately drawing maps to give GOP candidates significant advantages in 10 of the state's 13 congressional districts. The Maryland suit was filed after majority Democrats drew election maps to ensure members of their party got elected, especially targeting one district.

    Emmet Bondurant, lead counsel in Common Cause v. Rucho, said political gerrymanders violate the U.S. Constitution, which doesn't let states favor or disfavor a class of candidates or dictate electoral outcomes. The Supreme Court has said gerrymandering is a political or policy dispute which doesn't belong in court.

    But he thinks Justice Elena Kagan's dissent in the Wisconsin case may have provided an opening to argue extreme gerrymandering violates freedom of association - even though that theory wasn't argued in Gill. Kagan said gerrymanders harm the ability of political parties who aren't in charge to recruit candidates, raise money, and recruit volunteers.

    Riggs said the N.C. Constitution protects rights such as freedom of association more than the U.S. Constitution, but court precedents haven't mentioned political gerrymanders.

    She said if the plaintiffs prevail, expect a narrow ruling. The Supreme Court might be more conservative than it was in 2016 with Justice Brett Kavanaugh replacing Anthony Kennedy - a swing vote.

    Bondurant said he would prefer a ruling limiting state legislatures' ability to affect congressional elections, but not state legislative and other districts. States have differing election rules and standards, unlike the uniformity of congressional elections.

    "On the other hand, a ruling that says only extreme gerrymanders are unconstitutional will produce more litigation in the next century than there are people in North Carolina squared," Bondurant said. Legislators will push the limits, and lower courts won't be able to rely on a clear standard.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Presidential Message on International Holocaust Remembrance Day Statewide, Government, State and Federal Statement from the Press Secretary: Eminent Meetings with the China Delegation on Trade


HbAD0

Latest State and Federal

Former President Donald Trump suggested this week that if he becomes president again, he might allow Prince Harry to be deported.
Vice President Kamala Harris will visit a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic, reportedly the first time a president or vice president has visited an abortion facility.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said this week that the only campaign promise President Joe Biden has delivered on as president is the complete dismantling of the U.S. southern border.
Hamas is reeling after losing two of their most cherished leaders on the same day: military commander Saleh al-Arouri, and Harvard President Claudine Gay.
President Joe Biden’s brother told the Internal Revenue Service that Hunter Biden told him he was in business with a “protege of President Xi,” referring to the leader of China, according to notes by an IRS investigator that were divulged during a congressional interview of Jim Biden.
That’s the question Marguerite Roza of Georgetown University’s Edunomics Lab sought to answer in a recent webinar on the topic.
The University of Florida has fired all of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) employees and shut down its DEI office.
Glenn Beck: 'When the United States government can come after individuals, that's when you know our republic is crumbling.'
Rep. Mark Green (R-TN) reportedly blasted Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for “stonewalling” details about the illegal immigrant accused of murdering Laken Riley, a 22-year-old Georgia college student.

HbAD1

 
Back to Top