GOP Lawmakers Looking To Enshrine Eminent Domain Restrictions In State Constitution

Latest Polls (view all)

In the shadow of the political assassination of Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning USA, a stain now exists upon our nation's collective conscious, a condition that must be excised, or our nation will not function properly as one of a self-governed people. Understanding these long standing truths: What would you suggest as a quick, and, or proper corrective measure?

20% Destroy the Fascist Donald Trump and all of MAGA, because America must never be Great Again.

80% Our self-governed people, and their properly restored institutions, under President Trump, must discover the root causes to properly correct, and save our Constitutional Republic.

0% I thought we had to shut down Free Speech we don't like to save our "democracy," so I am totally confused now.

Click Here to Vote
10 Vote(s)

View all Polls

GOP Lawmakers Looking To Enshrine Eminent Domain Restrictions In State Constitution

Published: Saturday, March 9th, 2019 @ 8:07 pm
By: Carolina Journal ( More Entries )

    Publisher's note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal, and written by Lindsay Marchello, associate editor.

    The House Rules Committee gave a favorable report on Monday, Feb. 25 to a bill proposing a constitutional amendment limiting the use of eminent domain for economic development. Only one member, Rep. Darren Jackson, D-Wake, voted against the bill.

    House Bill 3 aims to enshrine eminent domain restrictions into the state constitution. Reps. Destin Hall, R-Caldwell; Chuck McGrady, R-Henderson; David Lewis, R-Harnett; and Ken Goodman, R-Montgomery are the primary sponsors of the bill. A companion bill, Senate Bill 27, is currently moving through the Senate.

    H.B. 3 would prohibit the taking of private property by eminent domain except for public use. The amendment would simply state: "private property shall not be taken by eminent domain except for a public use. Just compensation shall be paid and shall be determined by a jury at the request of any party."

    The bill also updates the statutory language specifying what types of utilities would be eligible for eminent domain use. Examples include facilities related to the distribution of natural gas or the construction of communication facilities.

    Hall said the bill sponsors believe eminent domain should be used only for public use, when there are not alternatives to acquiring private property.

    "It is about protecting property rights," Hall said. "When the government comes in and decides it is going to essentially take your property by force, it should only do so where it has to and only do so where it's doing it for a public use and not simply a public benefit like giving it to some private investors to build a grocery store. ..."

    If the bill passes, voters would could approve or reject the constitutional amendment at the May 2020 primary election.

    The House has passed similar legislation in pass sessions, but the bills never got through the Senate. With a companion bill in the Senate, this attempt at eminent domain restrictions may succeed where others have failed.

Go Back