This post appears here courtesy of The James G. Martin Center
. The author of this post is Natalia Mayorga
Community colleges in North Carolina have incorrectly reported Direct Loan information to their students, as well as inaccurate student information to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS).
Davidson-Davie Community College was audited by the NC State Auditor and in the audit report, it was detailed that the college was not providing sufficient information for Direct Loans. According to federal regulation, institutions are required to notify loan recipients in writing "no earlier than 30 days before, and no later than 30 days after"
crediting loan funds to the students' accounts. However, the college failed "to notify loan recipients of their right to cancel loans."
At Davidson-Davie, there were 571 students who received Direct Loans and about $3.69 million were disbursed to students. Out of a sample of 60 students at Davidson-Davie, none of them were notified of their right to cancel their Direct loan. The college cited that the reason for the lack of disclosure is that a new, more "streamlined"
form of communication for loan information was created, and in that communication it left out the recipients' right to cancel the loan.
If student or loan recipients are not notified that their loan can be canceled, they could feel obligated to take the loan, even if they might be unable to pay it, consequently, falling in delinquency, and/or ultimately defaulting on the loans. The college responded and stated that it would fix this issue by sending loan recipients a notification "via email"
of recipients' rights to cancel the loan, how to cancel it, and by when they can cancel.
The state auditor also identified errors in Pamlico Community College and Forsyth Technical Community College's student enrollment status reporting. Both colleges had the same error in which they did not update student enrollment status for students who received federal financial assistance and the inaccurate information was communicated to the NSLDS. In Pamlico, out of a sample of 21, 8 (38 percent) students had an incorrect enrollment status. According to Pamlico, the error happened because the National Student Clearinghouse (a third party) was used to report enrollment status to NSLDS. College management did not verify that Clearinghouse data was up to date, and the information was sent to the NSLDS. An inaccurate enrollment status can be problematic, because it can impact student Pell eligibility. Pamlico responded to the report by implementing a new procedure that would ensure accurate communication of data and student information to the NSLDS.
Forsyth had the same issue with student enrollment status and inaccurately reporting to the NSLDS. This college had a smaller percent, in which six out of 40 students had incorrect enrollment status. However, Forsyth is a much bigger college in which 4,057 students received financial assistance, with $19.2 million in disbursed funds. Again, Pell eligibility, as well as Direct Loan eligibility could be affected by inaccurate information of student enrollment status. Forsyth cited "inadequate training of new employees"
as the reason behind inaccurate reporting. Forsyth said it would train employees appropriately for future reporting.
Natalia Mayorga recently graduated with a bachelor's in psychology from UNC-Chapel Hill and is a Martin Center intern.