Federal appellate judges rule in favor of Durham schools in special-needs case | Eastern North Carolina Now

A unanimous 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a lower court ruling favoring Durham Public Schools. The case involved one student's complaint about special-needs services.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    A unanimous 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel has upheld a lower court ruling favoring Durham Public Schools in a dispute over one student's request for special-needs services.

    The case hinged on Durham schools' argument that the student and her mother had not followed proper legal procedures. They failed to file timely appeals as they challenged the school system's decisions about special services.

    "Important principles of federalism are at stake here," wrote Judge Marvin Quattlebaum for the three-judge panel.

    The judge noted the role of Joe Walters, a State Board of Education review officer involved in the case. "Perhaps Mr. Walters' strict adherence to North Carolina's procedural rules was a bit too ticky-tack," Quattlebaum wrote. "But even if that is correct, we cannot overturn a state agency's interpretation of its rules just because we might have handled things differently."

    The student and mother "have not identified any equitable principles that permit us to meddle in a state's interpretation of its laws," Quattlebaum added.

    The student, identified in court records as K.I., "was diagnosed with a variety of learning and psycho-social disorders," according to the court opinion. "Dissatisfied with her school's response to her request for special education services, K.I. and her mother J.I. asked for and received a hearing under North Carolina's administrative procedures. Because they disagreed with the hearing decision, K.I. and J.I. tried to appeal it administratively. But their appeal was not considered because K.I. and J.I. did not follow North Carolina's rules for filing appeals."

    The student and parent next filed in federal court under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, "which helps to ensure that children with disabilities receive special education services," Quattlebaum wrote. "But before a plaintiff can sue in federal court under the IDEA, she must first complete - or as the law phrases it, 'exhaust' - her state administrative remedies."

    "The district court found that K.I. and J.I.'s failure to properly appeal under North Carolina's administrative rules meant that they had not exhausted their administrative remedies," according to the 4th Circuit ruling.

    K.I. attended Durham Public Schools from kindergarten through sixth grade, then transferred to a local charter school. "Despite that move, K.I.'s family intends for K.I. to return to a public school in Durham for high school," Quattlebaum wrote.

    Judge Julius Richardson and Senior Judge Henry Floyd joined Quattlebaum's decision.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Lindberg could face retrial on bribery, fraud charges in March Carolina Journal, Statewide, Editorials, Government, Op-Ed & Politics, State and Federal Tillis, Sinema working out bipartisan immigration deal in U.S. Senate


HbAD0

Latest State and Federal

"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."
Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.
In addition, Sheikha Al-Thani has "taken to promoting Mamdani’s mayoral candidacy on social media, boosting news of favorable polling on Instagram"
Raleigh, N.C. — The State Board of Elections has reached a legal settlement with the United States Department of Justice in United States of America v. North Carolina State Board of Elections.
For this particular Hollywood love story, there was no girl bossing, no modern twists, no glorification of living in sin forever.

HbAD1

National attention is intensifying after the gruesome murder of a Ukrainian refugee on a Charlotte light rail on Aug. 22.
Trump is different from most politicians. He doesn’t feel he owes these corporations anything.
In Australia, Canada, and Europe, free speech on asylum, migration, and national identity is increasingly being curtailed by law.
The first three episodes of the current season of "South Park" have hammered President Donald Trump and other GOP targets.
16 days after Hamas October 7 massacre, Turkish President Erdogan said Hamas was “not a terrorist organization … [but rather] a liberation group"
"I’m ready to help defend President Trump’s America First agenda, Texas families, and individual liberty."

HbAD2

 
Back to Top