Plaintiff seeks dismissal of NC Supreme Court appeal tackling TV ‘fair report privilege’ | Eastern North Carolina Now

A plaintiff is asking the NC Supreme Court to dismiss his appeal in a lawsuit against Triangle television station WTVD. The suit involved a legal issue called the "fair report privilege."

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    Aman is dropping his NC Supreme Court appeal in a case challenging a Triangle television station's reliance on the "fair report privilege." A settlement in the case means the state's highest court will not have to tackle the First Amendment issue.

    The case had been scheduled for oral arguments on Nov. 7.


    Plaintiff Wesley Walker filed a consent motion Monday to dismiss his appeal. Walker and WTVD "have reached a full settlement of the dispute between them and a controversy no longer exists between them," wrote John Kirby, Walker's lawyer.

    The TV station and employee Shane Dietert "agree with the basis for this Motion and consent to the dismissal of the appeal in this matter," Kirby wrote. "The parties have agreed to bear their own costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses."

    WTVD had cited a "fair report privilege" to protect it against a lawsuit involving a false report from the Wake County Sheriff's Department. The TV station filed a brief in May with the state's highest court outlining its legal argument.

    The station reported in August 2019 that Walker had hit an elderly patient in the face while working at his job as a certified nursing assistant at an assisted living facility. The report was based on an email WTVD had received from a sheriff's department staff member.

    The information was wrong. Walker's stepfather had accused him of assault. The charge had nothing to do with Walker's job.

    Walker sued the sheriff's office and WTVD in August 2020. An August 2022 ruling from the NC Court of Appeals allowed Walker to proceed with his lawsuit against the sheriff's office. But the same court affirmed a lower court's ruling favoring WTVD against Walker's legal claims.

    The Appeals Court noted the fair report privilege protecting the television station from legal action.

    "Walker argues that the fair report privilege does not apply because the information provided to the WTVD Defendants - regarding an arrest warrant charging Walker with assault - was communicated to the television station in an email sent by the Sheriff's Department's Public Information Officer from his email account. Walker, however, cites no case from any jurisdiction in which a court has denied the application of the fair report privilege solely because the news report at issue relied upon information that a government agency communicated through its official email account," wrote WTVD's attorneys.


    "[T]he Court of Appeals' holding affirming the application of the fair report privilege to the 15 August 2019 email is consistent with, and supported by (1) the substantial jurisprudence from state and federal courts analyzing and applying the fair report privilege, and (2) the long-established public policy behind that doctrine encouraging the news media to report to the public on the operations of, and communications from, our court system and our law enforcement agencies," according to the brief.

    The lawsuit focused on one line in the TV news report about Walker's assault charge: "The Sheriff's office telling us the charge is related to his job."

    "The WTVD Defendants' reporting of this statement, properly attributed to the Sheriff's Department, is a precisely accurate report of the Sheriff's Department's inaccurate, official email communication to the WTVD Defendants," the TV station's lawyers wrote. "It is, therefore, as a matter of law, protected by the common law fair report privilege, and the Court of Appeals properly affirmed the trial court's granting of the WTVD Defendants' motion to dismiss."

    Walker's brief in the case, filed in April, disputed WTVD's reliance on a fair report privilege.

    "WTVD has admitted that this story created the impression that Mr. Walker assaulted an elderly patient," according to the brief. "As a result of this story, Mr. Walker was fired, and his reputation was impaired. He was forced to work at a pizza restaurant when he could not find employment as a CNA."

    WTVD reporter Ed Crump sent an email on Aug. 15, 2019, to sheriff's employee Eric Curry. "Just asking for a quick check to make sure this charge isn't related to this guy's job as [sic] Capital Nursing," Crump wrote. "I'm guessing it's domestic but if it's related to a client from Capital Nursing I'm interested in more details."

    "Related to his employer," Curry responded on the same day, according to court documents.


    "This four-word email, which was not in an official report, was not in the arrest warrant, and was not published to the general public, was the only information provided to WTVD indicating that the criminal charge pertained to the Plaintiff's employment," Kirby wrote in his April brief.

    A different WTVD employee contacted Walker's employer, Capital Nursing. A staffer indicated that Capital Nursing had no patients matching the name of the alleged assault victim and that the alleged assault hadn't taken place at the facility. No one contacted Walker, according to his brief.

    With no other confirmation, the TV station aired the story.

    "The Plaintiff actually saw this story when it aired live, and was around several other employees of Capital Nursing, who saw the same story. The Plaintiff was shocked and horrified at this story," Kirby wrote. "As a direct result of this false broadcast, the Plaintiff lost his job with Capital Nursing. The Plaintiff has not been able to resume his career as a CNA."

    Walker challenged the Appeals Court's decision.

    "The Court of Appeals held that the 'fair report privilege' protected the news outlet, even though the facts contained in its report were false and defamatory, and even though the new story was not based on an official report," Kirby wrote.

    "The Fair Report Privilege does not apply to this case, and the Plaintiff's case against WTVD should have been allowed to proceed,' Kirby argued. "The opinion of the Court of Appeals expands the scope of the Fair Report Privilege from allowing the press to rely on an 'official report,' to allowing it to rely on a 'flimsy email.' This is not consistent with North Carolina law, is not consistent with the Restatement of Torts, and is not consistent with the modern trend of cases addressing this issue."


    "Mr. Curry's four-word, one-on-one email to WTVD is not a report to which the fair report privilege applies," Kirby added. "If WTVD had merely reported the contents of the Warrant for Arrest, or the contents of some other official report, then it may claim the fair report privilege. But the statement of Mr. Curry in an email, directed only to WTVD's employee and not to the general public, which does not summarize some other official report, is not sufficient to invoke the fair report privilege."

    Based on the Appeals Court's 2022 ruling, Walker can continue his lawsuit against the sheriff's department.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

State law enforcement leaders ask NC Appeals Court to block Robeson sweepstakes ruling Carolina Journal, Statewide, Editorials, Government, Op-Ed & Politics, State and Federal ‘No Labels’ party recognized in NC, voter ID form revised


Back to Top