AP Blasted For Article Labeling Plagiarism As ‘New Conservative Weapon’ In Wake Of Claudine Gay Resignation | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Zach Jewell.

    The Associated Press was mocked on social media Wednesday after publishing an article blaming conservatives for using plagiarism as a new "weapon" after Harvard President Claudine Gay resigned amid extensive plagiarism allegations.

    Gay announced her resignation Tuesday in the wake of mounting plagiarism accusations and criticism over her Congressional testimony on Harvard's actions to combat anti-Semitism following the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel. Many people celebrated Gay's resignation as a victory for educational and moral standards, but according to the AP, the Harvard president's departure is proof that conservatives will use plagiarism to attack higher education.

    "The downfall of Harvard's president has elevated the threat of unearthing plagiarism, a cardinal sin in academia, as a possible new weapon in conservative attacks on higher education," AP reporters Collin Binkley and Moriah Balingit wrote.

    "The plagiarism allegations came not from her academic peers but her political foes, led by conservatives who sought to oust Gay and put her career under intense scrutiny in hopes of finding a fatal flaw," the article continued. "Her detractors charged that Gay - who has a Ph.D. in government, was a professor at Harvard and Stanford and headed Harvard's largest division before being promoted - got the top job in large part because she is a Black woman."

HbAD0

    The AP's post on X directing people to the article was hit with a "community note" that stated, "Plagiarism is a breach of rules for Harvard University. Claudine Gay was ultimately forced to resign for a series of breaches of this policy. Plagiarism - or application of the rules around plagiarism - therefore cannot be considered a 'weapon.'"

    Still, some leftists attempted to defend the AP for publishing the piece.

    "This is journalism. Getting closer to what truly happened and why," said Critical Race Theory proponent Ibram X. Kendi.

    Many political commentators, however, piled on the legacy media outlet for its attempt to cast blame on conservatives for the Harvard president's resignation.

    "Harvard president's resignation highlights new conservative weapon against the Left: [insert any objective standard here]," wrote Daily Wire Editor Emeritus Ben Shapiro.

    "Pretty worried about this new chronoweapon that can force you to go back as many as 27 years in time and commit plagiarism," said statistician and political writer Nate Silver.

    "This headline is something," Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) wrote. "Plagiarism is actually bad. It's not a 'conservative weapon.'"

    Gay's alleged plagiarism was first brought to light by Manhattan Institute senior fellow Christopher Rufo, who outlined what he indicated to be three instances of Gay plagiarizing, per Harvard standards, in her dissertation. The former Harvard president has now been hit with nearly 50 allegations of plagiarism affecting eight of her 17 published works.

HbAD1

    The AP's piece also went after Rufo for celebrating after Gay announced her resignation, claiming that his use of the word "scalped" in a social media post "invok[ed] a gruesome practice taken up by white colonists who sought to eradicate Native Americans." Scalping was a common practice used by American Indian warriors - both in intertribal conflicts and clashes with European settlers - to achieve honor and to showcase their victims' scalps as a trophy.

    "It's almost like the @AP buried the lede," said The Dispatch Editor-in-Chief and CNN contributor Jonah Goldberg. "'Taken up by white colonists' is a polite way of saying the settlers culturally appropriated the indigenous custom."

    Hayden Daniel contributed to this report.

poll#201
Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure
440 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#164
It has been far too many years since the Woke theology interlaced its canons within the fabric of the Indoctrination Realm, so it is nigh time to ask: Does this Representative Republic continue, as a functioning society of a self-governed people, by contending with the unusual, self absorbed dictates of the Woke, and their vast array of Victimhood scenarios?
  Yes, the Religion of Woke must continue; there are so many groups of underprivileged, underserved, a direct result of unrelenting Inequity; they deserve everything.
  No; the Woke fools must be toppled from their self-anointed pedestal; a functioning society of a good Constitutional people cannot withstand this level of "existential" favoritism as it exists now.
  I just observe; with this thoughtful observation: What will happen "when the Vikings are breeching our walls;" how do the Woke react?
845 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#212
A majority of Americans still believe in OUR 1st Amendment guaranteed Freedom of Speech; however, at what bold point does the constitutional right to Free Speech becomes unabashed anti-Semitic Hate Speech, and while it should possibly be tolerated on our college campuses, and on the streets of mostly Sanctuary Cities, these events should be rightfully observed and scrupulously monitored ... or, not? What is your true opinion of when too much of enough is just too much, or not?
  The answer to Free Speech I don't agree with is more, and incredibly robust Free Speech.
  There is a point when Free Speech becomes counter productive to sustaining a peaceful society.
  Free Speech should only be tolerated if it represents the status quo of the highly educated orthodoxy.
  Early in life, I learned to speak only when I am spoken to.
169 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#170
Considering what has happened to our Representative Republic since the corruptive orthodoxy that led to the tolerated abomination - The Russia Hoax - where felonies were perpetrated upon the American People by the creation of the Two Tiered Justice System, in the misnomer of "Social Justice:" Where do you stand on sustaining our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms in a society where injustice is chronically sanctioned by one political orthodoxy?
  I believe in a perfected society by employing a higher governmental authority to train the behavior of the public.
  The United States Constitution does not allow just a few freedoms, it guarantees ALL freedoms promised to Humankind by God.
  Just don't take away my Social Media.
420 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back
HbAD2

 
Back to Top