Senate Fails To Advance Border Security Compromise | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Daniel Chaitin.

    On Wednesday, the Democrat-controlled Senate failed to advance bipartisan legislation coupling border security and immigration reforms with funds for Ukraine, Israel, and other foreign causes.

    Forty-nine senators voted for the $118 billion package, while 50 opposed it. Four Republicans supported the measure, including Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), who led the negotiations on the GOP side. The others were Sens. Mitt Romney (R-UT), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).

    At least 60 votes were needed in the procedural step to get over the filibuster threshold. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who backed the bipartisan negotiations, and other top Republicans ended up voting against the bill along with a small group of Democrats.

HbAD0

    Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) changed his vote to a "no" in order to immediately bring up a motion to have the Senate consider a revised package that addresses the national security priorities in the legislation without the bipartisan border agreement.

    The updated measure has a price tag of roughly $95 billion. While sections for Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan, and other foreign priorities that included humanitarian aid remain intact, Afghan Allies Act provisions were dropped along with border-related sections. Amendments could be tacked on if debate is allowed to proceed.

    Months of negotiations culminated in the weekend release of a bipartisan package that came together after President Joe Biden made a roughly $106 billion national security supplemental request and Senate Republicans defeated a foreign aid bill in December amid GOP calls for the United States to focus on improving U.S. border security and immigration policies.

    The compromise measure included funds and reforms geared toward strengthening the asylum process and shoring up border security, but it drew backlash from a wide swath of Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, who took issue with some of its many provisions and warned the bill would give President Biden a boost in an election year. House Republicans vowed it would be "dead on arrival" in the lower chamber.

    One particular aspect of the legislation that came under fire, concerning the Border Emergency Authority, led critics to say it would allow 5,000 people a day to come into the country and up to two million illegal entries a year. Lankford said the claims were untrue and insisted the provision was being misinterpreted.

    "The emergency authority is not designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and turn 5,000 people around," Lankford said on X. "The Border Emergency Authority only lasts 3 yrs to force this Admin to shut down the border & to give time for the next [president] to hire more agents & more officers. After three years, the emergency authority expires because we should have regained full control of our border by then."

HbAD1

    McConnell thanked Lankford on Wednesday for trying to hash out a compromise with Sens. Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) as well as support from the Biden administration. He also acknowledged the bill would not make it through the Senate in its current form, despite a Border Patrol union endorsement, after many of his GOP colleagues came out against it.

    "The product he was able to secure earned the endorsement of the National Border Patrol Council - a sign that you're pointing in the right direction," McConnell said. "But as our colleagues recognize, the agreement does not have a path to become law."

poll#214
Understanding that there are two firm positions concerning the Open Border Crises, but many realties regarding its current, and, or projected real impacts to the functioning, sustainability of this Constitutional Republic: What position below best represents what you know to be true regarding this impactful policy?
  The United States' must continue the Executive initiative of Open Borders until a Democratic Congress can codify full Demographic Inclusion by keeping the Biden /Harris Open Borders policy in place.
  Our United States' borders are sovereign just as are our self-governed citizens, where borders must be maintained, monitored and defended, which is the position of core Republicans.
  I am in favor of Open Borders to make my America more of a global community; however, the federal government must now fix problems that "Red State" governors have caused in our cities.
  I do NOT favor the Democratic Socialists' disruption of the cultural fabric of my Representative Republic, and there will be Treasonous Hell to Pay when the certain calamity begins in earnest.
186 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#201
Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure
440 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#207
Should the Institutionalized Corruption of the Biden /Harris Administration, in this separate instance the Open Border Policy of our Sovereign Southern Border, be not only tolerated, but sanctioned by the raising of local spending by local politicians to pay for these now visible and known effects of rampant, and out-of-control Illegal Immigration?
  Yes, it is a kind thing to do, and a way that our county, our state can aid in this tremendous effort toward local federal foreign aid; and now, thankfully, in great abundance.
  No, our Constitutional Republic WILL NOT continue to exist, as our United States of America, if we do not control our sovereign borders, to protect our citizens, to keep them solvent and safe.
  I only consider what is topical and popular since my friends, too, only care to do the same.
277 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#206
In stripping away the heavy varnish of fakery by the heavy handed Corrupt Corporate Media; in taking a true view of what is real, right now with clear open eyes: How do you see this 46th President of these States United; what is your visceral first impression of Joe Biden after nearly 3 years on the job?
  A good man, wise and kind
  The Socialist President
  A president in praise of his son
  The Non Patriot President
  A successful president
  The Idiot President
  A knowledgeable president
  A corrupt president
  A perfect leader of the Democratic Socialist party
  The man is married to a "Doctor"
578 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back
HbAD2

 
Back to Top