The Trump Effect: Slovakia president to put only 2 genders in constitution; defy EU

Latest Polls (view all)

Where do you stand on the Transgender Issue now that the issue has gotten to the overt point of the open celebration of this lifestyle choice, dictated by certain direct and explicit actions.

90% I do not approve of behavior that has within its expressed tenants policies that harm children.

9.17% I do support the Trans Community in all its many facets because diversity is at a premium in today's society.

0.83% What is a "Children's Drag Queen Story Hour?"

Click Here to Vote
120 Vote(s)

View all Polls

The Trump Effect: Slovakia president to put only 2 genders in constitution; defy EU

Published: Tuesday, January 28th, 2025 @ 6:58 am
By: John Steed ( More Entries )

President Trump's moves to declare that there are only two genders, as is scientific fact, continue. Most recently the new administration returned to having passports reflect only male or female based on biology.

Now that is emboldening other countries to take similar moves. In Slovakia, the country's populist president, Robert Fico, has announced that he intends to amend the country's Constitution to provide that there are only two genders, based on biology. His parliament is almost certain to go along as it is controlled by a populist coalition involving populist / nationalist parties of both right and left.

This will set up a major conflict with the European Union bureaucrats who have been pushing the radical gender ideology that believes, unscientifically, that there are mulitple genders. Fico says this is a sovereign decision of his country and will not tolerate EU interference.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/news/stop-this-nonsense-slovakia-bids-to-enshrine-two-genders-in-constitution/

Go Back

Login to Leave a Comment

Comments

Big Bob said:

( January 30th, 2025 @ 8:23 am )

........and a correct interpretation of the 2nd amendment.

I'm not worried.

Conservative Voter said:

( January 30th, 2025 @ 5:24 am )

What is needed is a correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment by the Supreme Court to say what Congress said it eeant when they passed it, not what the modern far left wants to claim it means. When it went through Congress it was explained that "subject to the jurisdication thereof" did not include people who were not legally in the country. The left wants to twist and distort much of the Constitution, not just the 14th amendment.

Stan Deatherage said:

( January 29th, 2025 @ 11:54 pm )

No Big Bob: All EOs, all congressional legislation are the Laws of the Land until the court rules, or the EOs are rescinded by a future president or an act of congress.

Do you not remember how Idiot President forgave billions of dollars of student loans to other Leftists until the court ruled, and still the Idiot President continued to do so even though "the court ruled?"

The Democrat Socialist senate would not act against the Idiot President Biden because of their wanton corruption. Can you not remember any of this?

So of us can remember such things, you can not.

Big Bob said:

( January 29th, 2025 @ 10:47 pm )

Darn right it will.
And you have it backwards. The EO is not the law of the land until the court rules.

Since a remedy exists to amend the constitution, orange boy will likely lose in court.

Again.

Steven P. Rader said:

( January 29th, 2025 @ 8:25 pm )

Newsflash, Bob. Everyone expected the EO to go through the courts. The EO was issued for the purpose of getting the issue back in the courts, so that hopefully, the Supreme Court can clarify that the 14th Amendment means what its authors told their fellow senators and congressmen it meant. That is that it does not apply to those in the country illegally. The authors specifically set that out is the amendment's legislative history. Of course, the left, including liberal judges have a habit of trying to rewrite many parts of the Constitution and "find" things that were really never there.

There were early cases under the 14th amendment that ruled it did not apply to American Indians, and Congress had to pass a special law to designate American Indians as US citizens. The reason was they were not considered as fully "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States due to their tribal loyalties under tribal treaties.

Stan Deatherage said:

( January 29th, 2025 @ 4:25 pm )

Big Bob: I know the 14th Amendment. The interpretation you Leftists believe that exists is not in the Bill of Rights. The 14th Amendment was designed to give freed slaves complete unambiguous citizenship, the same for their offspring, and nothing else.

The 14th Amendment can be interpreted again and again by the supreme court, but it is a long leap to state that Illegals can sneak into this Republic, have babies, and their offspring are instantly legal, and those Illegals are therefore anchored here in this Constitutional Republic.

Mr. Trump's Executive Order is the law of the land until the Supreme Court says it is not, or another president or congress disagrees likewise.

Big Bob said:

( January 29th, 2025 @ 2:45 pm )

The 14th amendment. Agree or disagree with it, that's your right. No problem. Whatever you think of it, it's in the constitution. Can it be changed? Yes. There is a lawful way to amend or change the constitution.

Newsflash - the constitution cannot be changed by executive order.

Stan Deatherage said:

( January 29th, 2025 @ 9:53 am )

Big Bob: What babble speak do you utter now?

Please explain.

View All Comments

New poll: after LA fires, voters sour on Mayor Bass, more open to Republicans

Rant & Rave, Editorials, Beaufort Observer, Op-Ed & Politics

Trump Reveals What Biden Wrote To Him In Letter