Tim Kaine Claims Trump Acted ‘Prematurely’ In Striking Iran, Presses Ahead With War Powers Vote | Eastern NC Now

"The United States should not be in an offensive war against Iran without a vote of Congress," the Virginia Dem said.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Daniel Chaitin.

    Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA), who is pushing the Senate toward a war powers vote, said on Sunday that President Donald Trump acted "prematurely" to strike Iran's nuclear facilities this weekend without the consent of Congress.

    On "Face the Nation" Kaine explained to CBS News journalist Margaret Brennan that he filed a War Powers Resolution that will "ripen" and be brought to a vote on the floor of the upper chamber this coming week. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is working with Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) to make the vote happen, he noted.

    "The United States should not be in an offensive war against Iran without a vote of Congress," Kaine said. "The Constitution is completely clear on it."

    He continued: "And I am so disappointed that the president has acted so prematurely. The foreign minister of Israel said Friday night that its own bombing campaign had set the Iranian nuclear program back, 'at least two or three years.' There was no urgency that suggested, while diplomatic talks were underway, that the U.S. should take this unilateral action by President Trump's orders yesterday."

HbAD0

    Vice President JD Vance said on ABC's "This Week" that Trump ordered the strikes on three of Iran's facilities to prevent the country from being able to produce nuclear weapons.

    "No, we're not at war with Iran, Jon," Vance told anchor Jonathan Karl. "We're at war with Iran's nuclear program."

    Brennan pressed Kaine for a response to Vance.

    "There seems to be a lot of legal parsing on the definition of the word 'war' here. What do you make of that description?" Brennan asked.

    "I think it's, it's BS, and I think anybody hearing it would conclude the same thing. When you're bombing another nation, ask them if they think it's war," Kaine said. "They do, would we think it was war if Iran bombed a U.S. nuclear facility? Of course we would. And the U.S., you know, we've invaded two neighbors of Iran, Afghanistan and Iraq, to topple their regimes since 2000. Those were wars. This is the U.S. jumping into a war of choice at Donald Trump's urging, without any compelling national security interests for the United States to act in this way, particularly without a debate and vote in Congress. We should not be sending troops, and risking troops' lives in an offensive war without a debate in Congress."

    Brennan pointed out that Trump has not authorized a ground invasion.

    "In fact, he said he really doesn't want to send in ground forces," she said. "When it came to what was just described to the public by the Pentagon, it was really characterized as limited in scope. It sounds like you believe those early hour descriptions are going to turn out to be false."

HbAD1

    Kaine replied: "I do. The War Powers resolution says that a member of Congress can challenge the President, if the President initiates hostilities against a foreign nation. Doesn't use the - even though the title is War Powers resolution, the statute says if you initiate hostilities without congressional authorization, even a single member of the House or Senate can force a vote on the Senate floor. There is no doubt that the U.S. sending this massive set of Tomahawk missiles and B-2 bombers and bunker busters on three Iranian nuclear sites is hostilities. Now, again, some in the Senate may say this is great and we want to vote for it. I happen to think that getting into a third offensive war in the Middle East in the last 25 years is absolutely reckless and foolish, and I'm going to be doing everything I can to convince my colleagues of that. I may or may not succeed, but Congress should have the debate and vote on this before we escalate the risk to American troops, which this action has done."

poll#220
Regarding the recent Israel /Iran Conflict (the "12 Day War"), culminating in the United States Air Force employing seven B2 Bombers to complete a 33 hour flight, dropping 14 fifteen ton bunker busting bombs on three Iranian nuclear facilities buried deep under mountain rock, which destroyed Iran's nuclear ambitions against Israel and the United States: Should President Trump have unilaterally made the decision to make such a bold decision to conduct this operation, without first running this prospective operation before the US Congress for their approval?
  No, The War Powers Act prohibitions, which requires NO presidential military action without congressional approval.
  Yes, the President has Article 2 Constitutional authority to take unilateral military action to protect the American People, providing he does not break congressional codes, which he did not.
  Don't care, never have.
107 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#201
Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure
508 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#218
Now that President Trump is picking his cabinet and immediate staff to insulate him from the poor judgement of the Bureaucratic Class, while moving quickly to transition this Constitutional Republic unto a wise and sustainable direction: What is your immediate impression as to how our nation will prosper?
  We are headed toward a Golden Age in America's self-governed society.
  This will all wind up in a clustered mess since Trump is a Fascist, and thought to be the second coming of Adolf Hitler by our best journalists.
  This is a time where critical days lay ahead, where only wise and responsible decisions must be made to sustain US.
  I generally do not pay attention, but expect only the best to occur ... and that is what I always expect.
161 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )



Comment

( June 28th, 2025 @ 4:30 pm )
 
It should not be to big of a stretch of one's imagination to understand, from this report, why Hillary Clinton chose Tim Kaine to be her running mate in the 2016 election against Donald J. Trump.



Trump Scores ‘Big Win’ Against Newsom In California National Guard Clash Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics sinister new moves by globalist German govenrment to suppress freedom of speech

HbAD2

 
 
Back to Top