![]() |
Commented on Happy 100 Days of Non-ComplianceWhat should he have recused himself for? At the point the motion was made to loan the money, he hadn't sold the property to anyone. He was just a Council Member who owned property.
Commented: Tuesday, October 31st, 2023 @ 1:19 pm
By: Kary
|
![]() |
Commented on Happy 100 Days of Non-ComplianceTHIS IS A LIE
"We also know that Council Member Brooks bought two lots from the Housing Authority after making a motion to move the $580,000 out of the General Fund over to the Housing Authority and then sold it back the Housing Authority for a profit." He may have sold them to the Housing Authority, but to claim that he bought them after making a motion is simply not true. Those lots we purchased in 2012, DB 1778, P113.
Commented: Tuesday, October 31st, 2023 @ 10:47 am
By: Kary
|
![]() |
Commented on Happy 100 Days of Non-ComplianceSend them then. I don't think they're going to prove what you say they're going to prove.
katykat6248@gmail.com
Commented: Tuesday, October 31st, 2023 @ 9:11 am
By: Kary
|
![]() |
Commented on Happy 100 Days of Non-ComplianceYour claim that Mr. Brooks made the motion to give the $$ to the Housing Authority, then bought those two lots with intent to sell is 100% straight up BS. The lot that Mr. Brooks bought in January is located on Fleming St, not on Gladden St. I'd love to see proof otherwise.
Also, LOL, your whole premise is that the City just gave $580,000 to the Housing Authority. It was $528,000, and it was a loan. I realize there were other items/services given to the Housing Authority as well, but helping the Housing Authority out with discounted or free water, sewer, or electrical services has been going on for years.
Commented: Monday, October 30th, 2023 @ 3:26 pm
By: Kary
|
![]() |
Commented on Happy 100 Days of Non-ComplianceI know how deed searches work. If you did, you would know the 10/2 deed is for a piece of property at 3rd & Van Norden, not Edgewater Dr.
I have searched back through a bunch of minutes and have yet to see a mention of a $580,000 transfer to the Housing Authority. The date you claim that occured would be great.
Commented: Monday, October 30th, 2023 @ 2:02 pm
By: Kary
|
![]() |
Commented on Happy 100 Days of Non-ComplianceProof that Mr. Brooks sold properties for a profit to the Housing Authority. Proof that the City gave the Housing Authority $580,000, and that they took expensive vacations with the money, after splitting the proceeds with Mr. Brooks. You can't just make crazy stuff up, and spout it all over Facebook and this site.
Commented: Monday, October 30th, 2023 @ 1:29 pm
By: Kary
|
![]() |
Commented on Happy 100 Days of Non-ComplianceThe burden of proof is on Mr. Ceres. I'm not the one making these outlandish claims all over the internet.
Commented: Monday, October 30th, 2023 @ 12:07 pm
By: Kary
|
![]() |
Commented on Happy 100 Days of Non-ComplianceI'd love to see some evidence to back these claims up. Council minutes, deeds, etc. Otherwise it just sounds like you're trying to trash Mayor Sadler to prop up Bobby Roberson.
Commented: Monday, October 30th, 2023 @ 8:51 am
By: Kary
|