![]() |
Coockoo, coockoo, coockoo
Commented: Wednesday, May 14th, 2014 @ 9:09 am
By: Edwin Hardy
|
![]() |
Commented on The Truth Factor: A Postmortem of SortsPublisher's note: All right, I will allow this one since this subject matter has not been stated as of yet.
Sleep tight!
Commented: Friday, May 9th, 2014 @ 11:29 pm
By: Edwin Hardy
|
![]() |
Commented on The Truth Factor: A Postmortem of SortsThe anonymous mailings on Ashley were illegal because they had no disclosure disclaimer telling who was responsible for the piece. Since the two mailings were illegal, I never expected you to admit to knowing anything about them. Not because I think you wouldn't do it and not because I don't think you wouldn't just silently sit back when you knew someone was doing it.
Commented: Friday, May 9th, 2014 @ 11:24 pm
By: Edwin Hardy
|
![]() |
Commented on The Truth Factor: A Postmortem of SortsNo, they wanted you out and Don Cox in. That is apparent. What is about the hit pieces are my comments tonight.
Commented: Friday, May 9th, 2014 @ 11:19 pm
By: Edwin Hardy
|
![]() |
Commented on The Truth Factor: A Postmortem of SortsDo you even care self-proclaimed "principled one" that his kids suffered?
Commented: Friday, May 9th, 2014 @ 11:13 pm
By: Edwin Hardy
|
![]() |
Commented on The Truth Factor: A Postmortem of SortsYou took just the road I thought you would.
Commented: Friday, May 9th, 2014 @ 11:11 pm
By: Edwin Hardy
|
![]() |
Commented on The Truth Factor: A Postmortem of SortsDo you know who mailed the anonymous pieces of mail on Ashley? Let's see how honest you are?
Commented: Friday, May 9th, 2014 @ 11:02 pm
By: Edwin Hardy
|
![]() |
Commented on The Truth Factor: A Postmortem of SortsOK, Stan. I agree. I hate dirty campaigning. I have been a serious victim and so has my friend Ashley. However, you know who you are dealing with because no anonymous pieces went out on you. Ashley does not know for sure who put out the anonymous "hit piece" on him in 2012 and this past election. They one had no disclaimers. However, we are pretty certain who was involved and you at least know them (if you yourself didn't have something to do about it or knowledge it was coming). The 2012 piece had false allegations in a divorce lawsuit of a prurient nature which have since been proven false. However, Ashley's kids had to hear about it at school and through many tears he had to have a father moment with his kids to explain bad people to his kids. Sad thing was Ashley was only a supporter of that candidate in 2012 and was NOT the candidate. If such campaigning disgusts you, then tell us what you know (or confess if you did a part in it)) and we know you know something and denounce those people, reject them and never support them. A warning from me is much more to be worried about than a warning from you. I have more at my disposal from brains, to money, to knowledge and specialized skills. Anybody who runs for office and has the support of you, Buzz, Hood, etcetera shall be fully investigated and the most personal information will be publicized. Then we shall check their donor list and do the same to donors and major supporters and fellow travelers. Don't you agree information about a candidate and those around him should be public so that the people can vote with knowledge? I do. If it is good enough for your crowd to go after a supporter with viciousness and anonymously as a coward(s), then it is OK for me to do so legally with documentation and disclaimers. Since Ashley's wife and kids were fair game to those around you, if not even you, then wives and kids of candidates and supporters shall be fair game to us. Good luck finding candidates and donors and volunteers, because I am publicly telling my plans. They better be squeeky clean! I know how to legally protect myself and to use it and quite cheap I might add. This is my warning. Give me names or reject those you know did those things. Sandy
Commented: Friday, May 9th, 2014 @ 10:47 pm
By: Edwin Hardy
|