Commissioners Deatherage and Richardson are Inducted into the ACLU 'Wall of Shame'

    As your Beaufort County Commissioner, I, along with Commissioner Hood Richardson, have achieved a rather dubious milestone. We have achieved the distinction of being inducted into the North Carolina ACLU "Wall of Shame."

    Now that I, and my compadre, have been spoken of in such a disparaging manner by the ACLU, I know I have now finally made my mark as a local politician, who also takes a very dim view of those who are bent on the destruction of our society, by the weakening of our United States Constitution. This is the prime directive of the ACLU, which like the current Labor Unions, have tragically lost their way, and no longer provide their once valuable service - to protect the weakest among us in our society of Americans and American capitalism.

    What stupifies me is how the ACLU could take their valuable time to concern themselves with local politicians, Hood and Stan, when their larger "fish to fry" is their spirited, and ardent defense and advocacy of the North American Man / Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).

    Whheehw. Does this make your skin crawl too?

    Yep ... they no longer protect the weak. They now protect those that prey upon the weak. What great Americans - the ACLU?

    Here below is an image file of that periodical announcing their newest, and very proud awardees of the ACLU's "Wall of Shame." This article is full of hyperbole, but the ACLU never lets the truth get in the way of telling their side of "the story."



    This article provided coutesy of standeatherage.com.


Comments

( June 20th, 2010 @ 4:48 pm )
Mathew, I thank-you in advance for any contribution you will make. You will be the second lawyer that contributes to our publication. Diane Rufino, who maintains her NC license, regularly contributes Op-Ed pieces. She has even done one film review. I look forward to yours.
( June 20th, 2010 @ 4:46 am )
I'll try to put together an Equal Protection overview. Meanwhile, this paper (papers.ssrn.com) serves as a good primer on some of the other arguments likely to be made by anti-deportation activists (e.g., preemption of local action by federal regulation).
( June 18th, 2010 @ 10:20 pm )
Mathew, Hood and I have become well aquainted with Plyer v. Doe, however, we could never understand it at the level that yor are becoming knowlegable of the issue of enforcing the removal of illegal immigrants. I welcome any article you wish to write on the subject.
( June 18th, 2010 @ 10:19 pm )
Mathew, Hood and I have become well aquainted with Plyer v. Doe, however, we could never understand it at the level that yor are becoming knowlegable of the issue of enforcing the removal of illegal immigrants. I welcome any article you wish to write on the subject.
( June 18th, 2010 @ 3:09 pm )
Unfortunately, some of the proposed measures--at least as they are described by the ACLU article--might trigger Equal Protection Clause difficulties. For example, the Supreme Court has overturned laws that impact the "innocent children" of illegals. Check out Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982).
( May 18th, 2010 @ 9:21 pm )
Clifton, You would be surprised as to what extent this issue stokes the fires of political passions within liberals. Search my name on the internet on this issue, and a whole new group of lies are created about my person. What a way to defend an argument - to lie.
( May 17th, 2010 @ 12:51 pm )
Immigrants need to become US citizens plain and simple. Earn a living, and pay taxes, and learn English. THEN and only then should they be eligible for government help and assistance. If we went to another country looking for a handout, we would get thrown out.



Candidates' Forum Bloodless Warfare: Politics, Op-Ed & Politics Just a Few Thoughts Before we Turn Down that Road



{ QR Code for Mobile Phones }

ad-20111027162037