Comments for Hidden behind climate policies, data from nonexistent temperature stations | Eastern NC Now
Browse all Comments for Hidden behind climate policies, data from nonexistent temperature stations...
 |
Who is more likely to be crazy? A loony left internet troll who thinks his opinions are "Fact" and "truth" or twenty some prominent scientists from around the world who are interviewed in that documentary and explain the facts behind their scientific opinions? But he is content calling a bunch of people a whole lot smarter than him "crazy".
Commented: Friday, April 12th, 2024 @ 6:26 pm
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
No thanks bud. I stay away from crazy, present company excluded, of course.
Commented: Friday, April 12th, 2024 @ 4:29 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Little Bobbie (a.k.a. Chicken Little on steroids), if you would just watch that British TV documentary, you would learn from prominent scientists that CO2 and the greenhouse effect have nothing whatsoever to do with the current natural warm period.
Commented: Friday, April 12th, 2024 @ 9:39 am
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
CT (MAGA Exxon)- You are right about the earth natural heating and cooling cycle but that cycle is being altered. However,
Your whole argument hinges on the notion fossil fuel emissions have no impact. Pretty big elephant to ignore. That's the reason the crap you post on the subject is...crap. BTW fossil fuel extraction emits methane a much more potent greenhouse gas. A lot of it.
Commented: Thursday, April 11th, 2024 @ 2:08 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Here is another good one. When a BBC reporter tried to lecture Guyana's president over "climate change" as applied to Guyana's new oil and gas reserves, Guyana's president shut him down:
www.zerohedge.com
Commented: Thursday, April 11th, 2024 @ 1:39 pm
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
During the CLimategate email scandal, it was revealed that the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in the UK had obtained custody of the UK's historical temperature records and that those numbers had been "adjusted" as part of their studies. University officials later acknowledged that they did not know if original unadjusted copies of those historical records even still existed. This is just one more example of the manipulation of data for ideological purpuses that is ongoing with the climate alarmists.
Commented: Thursday, April 11th, 2024 @ 10:00 am
By: John Steed
|
|
FACT: The Earth has been in a natural multi-centurry warming cycle since the end of the last natural multi-century cooling cycle, known to climatologists as the Little Ice Age or Maunder Minimum, in the 19th century.
FACT: These multi-century warming and cooling cycles have happened throughout Earth's history and there is no evidence that changes in CO2 has caused any of them. FACT: The last multi-century warming cycle, the Medieval Warm Period, was warmer than today, and civilization flousished with no harmful impacts recorded from the warm period. FACT: The longest and hottest warming period known was the Holocene Maximum which was much warmer than today. The Holocene Maximum coincided in part with the rise of ancient Greek civilization, and nothing in ancient Greek writings suggest any harmful impact on humans or the environment. FACT: Bobbie's opinion that fossil fuel emissions are connected with the current natural warm period comes from a theory espoused by a Swedish physicist in the 1890s, which got no traction in science at the time. After this forgotten and discredited theory was mentioned in an article in the British magazine "The New Scientist" in the 1970s, Margaret Thatcher's government recognized its political usefulness in her battles with the coal miners unions and the Arab oil sheiks, and she put a lot of government money into promoting it for political purposes. The UN later picked it up as useful for their purposes. Bobbie is deep down the rabbit hole of the globalist agenda, and is likely on the payroll of either Soros or Schwab or another of their ilk. For the REAL science on "climate change / global warming" please watch the British TV documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle" which was broadcast nationally on the UK's Channel 4 and the many prominent scientists interviewed in that documentary which can be watched at this link: www.youtube.com
Commented: Wednesday, April 10th, 2024 @ 5:16 pm
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
|
Given their manipulation of data revealed in the Climategate email dump, this is not at all surprising. The climate alarmists will fudge whatever they have to in order to push their narrative and agenda. "Hide the decline" as they said in those Climategate emails.
Another good example is looking at where their significant increases in temperature come from, and those are the weather stations that in years past were in rural areas that have now bcome urbanized. The increased temperatures come from the change in surroundings, not "climate change". One symbol of climate alarmist manipulation was Michael Mann's hockety stick chart, which was a major exhibit in one of the UN reports but disappeared thereafter. What happened was that a Canadian mining engineer wondered about Mann's chart and asked for the supporting data, which Mann refused to give him (a suspicious move in science itself). The mining engineer then tried to go through other sources at the university where Mann taught to obtain the supporting data. Finally a graduate student who had worked on the project gave him the website address with all the raw data. The mining engineer was then able to see that Mann had cherry picked data to come up with a predetermined conclusion and blew the whistle on it. Mann has been tied to at least one other major fabrication, a study showing rising temperatures in Anarctica. Mann's study was based on temperature averages, but on that one the raw data was readily available, and it blew up Mann's theory. All but one of the reporting stations had maintained a steady temperature, and what threw the average off was a single reporting station, and that changed dramatically between two years. It turned out that the siting of that reporting station had been moved at the time the readings changed dramatically. The old location of that station had consistently had cooler readings and the new location, which kept the same name, consistently higher readings. So Mann's whole study was garbagte. Mann once taught in Virginia, and the state Attorney General had once opened an investigation on him for obtaining grant money based on bogus studies. Thereafter, Mann moved to another state.
Commented: Wednesday, April 10th, 2024 @ 4:28 pm
By: John Steed
|
|
Fact: The earth is heating due to fossil fuel emissions.
The implications of that fact are up for debate and people all over the world do so everyday. CT and his opposing views included. Unfortunately, he is either a paid influencer or is deep down the rabbit hole of conspiracy theories, which makes anyone who chooses that route, look like an idiot. Take your pick.
Commented: Wednesday, April 10th, 2024 @ 12:56 pm
By: Big Bob
|
|
Remember, the climate alarmists are unique in science by refusing to debate their positions. Real science is ALWAYS open to debate. Albert Einstein was always willing to and did debate his theory of relativity. Climate alarmists are more science fiction than real science.
Also remember the Climategate emails. These revealed that the climate alarmists in the scientific community were a bunch of plotters and schemers working to paper over whatever they had to ("hide the decline") in order to push their theory, and actively working to deplatform scientists with opposing views. These conmen and like the mafia. It is the propaganda media that largely keeps this globalist scam alive because they refuse to tell both sides.
Commented: Wednesday, April 10th, 2024 @ 10:13 am
By: Concerned Taxpayer
|
