Speech-Stifling Ordinance Grants Notable Exemption | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Richard Dietz, who is a print columnist for the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

    WINSTON-SALEM     On June 26, in McCullen v. Coakley, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously struck down a Massachusetts law requiring pro-life activists to stay outside a 35-foot "buffer zone" around abortion clinics. Although the outcome of this landmark First Amendment ruling was unanimous, the justices were deeply divided in their legal reasoning.

    One key dispute involved an exception in the law: Massachusetts prohibited pro-life protesters, and most other people, from speaking inside the buffer zone. But the state permitted abortion clinic employees within the zone to speak freely. Four of the nine justices believed that this exception doomed the law without any further analysis. The majority disagreed and ruled that a more detailed First Amendment analysis was still necessary.

    Residents of Winston-Salem recently became subject to a speech-restrictive law with an exception like the one in McCullen, although the city's exception is rooted in business cronyism, not political viewpoints. The new ordinance, which took effect July 1, requires door-to-door salesmen in Winston-Salem to obtain a license and city-issued ID before making sales pitches to city residents. The law applies to all forms of commercial sales except one — it exempts newspaper salesmen.

    There are, of course, obvious reasons why Winston-Salem's print newspapers, struggling to maintain their subscriber base in the digital age, would want an exemption from this ordinance and the resulting registration fees. And there are obvious reasons why politicians in the city might want to give preferential treatment to the newspapers that report on them to the public.

    But that is little comfort to other salesmen — of, say, encyclopedias, or cable TV, or anything else — who must comply with sales laws from which the newspapers are exempt.

    In light of McCullen and other recent cases, this preferential treatment raises serious constitutional concerns. But whether it is constitutional or not, it is certainly bad policy. One of the greatest benefits of free speech is the competition that is created through the open exchange of information and beliefs. Scholars call this the "marketplace of ideas."

    It works like any other free market. Just as competition among businesses benefits consumers, competition among differing viewpoints benefits the public discourse — it helps society separate the strong ideas from the weak ones. And as in any other marketplace, we should be wary of government intervention in the marketplace of ideas.

    Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens aptly summed up this concern in an opinion years ago: "The First Amendment directs us to be especially skeptical of regulations that seek to keep people in the dark for what the government perceives to be their own good."

    To be fair, favoring the speech of certain salesmen over others may seem far removed from censoring one side or another in an important public debate. But in a robust democracy like ours, there is little risk of our freedoms disappearing overnight. Instead, the greatest threat to our liberty is the slow erosion of our rights, in steps so small that we barely notice.

    For this reason, we should be critical of any laws that favor one group of speakers over another — no matter how remote or insignificant that favoritism might appear. Because, if society becomes accustomed to our government playing favorites among speakers, we may soon find politicians and bureaucrats tilting the debate on issues far more important than which salesmen are allowed to knock at our doors.

    Richard Dietz is a partner at Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP. His practice focuses on appeals and constitutional law. He is also a 2014 E.A. Morris Leadership Fellow.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

Legislators Should Scrap New N.C. Tax on E-Cigarettes Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Presidential Stakes In State Economies


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

With the startling announcement that resources from conservative media organization PragerU will now be available to students in Florida public schools, it's time for parents to be on the lookout for what other dangerous, right-wing material their unsuspecting children may discover at school.
The Biden administration announced on Wednesday that it would be canceling oil and gas leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Preserve and move to ban drilling in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve.
Comedian Bill Maher slammed the media for not covering the scandals involving Hunter Biden, noting that if former President Donald Trump’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., engaged in the same behavior it would be covered constantly.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg dropped his appeal of a ruling that determined a former prosecutor from his office must testify to the GOP-led House Judiciary Committee about the criminal investigation into former President Donald Trump.
President Joe Biden told a story at a Manhattan campaign event, appearing completely oblivious to the fact that — just moments earlier — he had told the exact same story, almost word for word.
Members of the UNC System’s Board of Governors and UNC-Chapel Hill’s Board of Trustees are asking questions and offering pushback to university administrators following a “surprise” announcement last week
Democratic legislators in California are pushing to establish diversity audits of gubernatorial appointments.
Fox News has scored exclusive TV rights for what many are already calling the debate of the century. The political bloodbath will pit Gavin Newsom, governor of the state people are fleeing from in terror, against Ron DeSantis, governor of the state people are fleeing to.


Thousands of parents in Mexico took to the streets last week to burn education materials that featured “Marxist-communist” indoctrination from the country’s department of education.
A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that former President Donald Trump is liable for allegedly making defamatory remarks about writer E. Jean Carroll after she first publicly accused him four years ago of sexually assaulting her at a Manhattan department store during the mid-1990s.
North Carolina U.S. Sens. Ted Budd and Thom Tillis are among a contingent of 10 Republican senators seeking answers from the Department of Justice (DOJ) about seven “service centers” with ties to the Chinese Communist Party operating across the U.S.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said this week that he believes that Democrats will likely seek to replace President Joe Biden ahead of the 2024 presidential election and that they will do so by bringing in Michelle Obama.
Since June 1, at least 18,000 people have lost health care coverage who likely would have been able to keep it under Medicaid Expansion
“Sound of Freedom” is dominating in 18 Latin American countries after it took over the number one spot at the box office on its opening weekend following the film’s release on August 31.
Local patriarch Methuselah spent yet another frustrating day threshing his grain after his wife once again brought up a big argument they had 741 years ago, leading the couple into an uncomfortable silence.
Border facilities are slammed with migrants and officials are mass releasing immigrants into the U.S. interior while thousands more stream into the country.
Today, the NC House of Representatives voted to override six more of Governor Cooper’s vetoes:


Back to Top