|
Gene Scarborough said:
( August 12th, 2014 @ 6:50 am )
On this one, Stan, I would have to say you are about neck deep in your rut!
|
Well, now Conservative v Liberal is more a perception of truth over fantasy; knowing math over not knowing math, and knowing the world for what it really is, rather than the way you wish it to be.
Anyway, if Liberals were such thoughtful executors: Why would women's reproductive rights, above all else, be their one issue? |
It is amazing how we look at the same set of people and see things almost in opposite ways. Unlike the Commissioners, I am will to compromise on some realistic view.
H.L. Menkin defined Conservatives as "My contemporary ancestors." I like that and it seems to be most accurate. I watched Conservatives take over the Southern Baptist Convention and CONSERVE NOTHING! It sounded good, but it was an excuse to put in places of power ONLY those of like mind and single direction. Lies and distortions proved "the end justifies the means to it." Jesus would call them Pharisees bent on control and distortion. I will let his words of Matthew 23 speak for themselves. "Liberal" to me means a spirit of openness to possibilities not yet conceived. Such was the attitude of our Founding Fathers who decided the way of the rich and controllers of England and Europe needed a change for better. The rich were in control and getting richer / the poor and working class had not chance because only the first-born son of a rich family could inherit the wealth. Fathers bought land grants in the New World so their other children could have a chance. It was a great risk with great danger, but it was all about OPPORTUNITY. Church and State were supposed to be separate / religion was to be the choice of the individual / the vote of each citizen was paramount to the success of the new experiment. It appears to me that the current Conservatives have recreated everything our ancestors left behind 200+ years ago. I could be wrong, but my last name is Scarborough of Scarborough, England and Scarborough Castle, and my ancestors were not the lucky eldest son!!! We wanted freedom and opportunity without the law beating us into serfdom. |
My impression from years of observation:
Liberals: feel rather than think; they accept pre-planned thinking constructs readily, they tend to look at the world outside of any historical context; and at no point do they do any math. One more point: They believe the constitution to be a flexible document that can be used as a tool by activist judges, i.e. Roe v. Wade. Conservatives (real): Tend to be guided by principled motives, can do math very well, and believe that the constitution is a guide for all current and future governing. One other pertinent fact: Getting Conservatives on the same page on any issue, that is not based in pure Conservative principles, is 'like herding cats'. |
Would anyone care to define "Liberal / Conservative." The terms get thrown around rather "liberally" of late!
|
We 'are a nation of laws, not of Men.'
It was part of the Jaycee Creed, and I never fully knew what it meant until I became a county commissioner, and learned to govern by real principles, and the laws, as imperfect as some may be, that bind all of us. I think that is why I have always been so offended by RINOs like McRoy and Klemm. They made up the rules as they went along. |
|
Somebody said:
( August 10th, 2014 @ 10:52 pm )
One of the more disturbing aspects in our times as citizens of the United States and North Crolina is the fact that modern day liberals in the government seem to think it is up to them to enforce or not to enforce laws as they please.
|
Simply, it is the law, and some us still believe that we 'are a nation of laws'.
|
Do we really want our AG and costly staff fighting a Constitutional battle in a Federal Court??? Especially where there is a great divide in the citizens of NC???
If those wanting to keep the Marriage Amendment want to keep it, let them pay for the defense~~~not NC taxpayers who have many more important issues under investigation/prosecution now! |
I think Jesus was more in the salvation business rather than the Hell and damnation line of work.
Now the Old Testament guys ... well ... it's all there. Regardless, the Attorney General serves as the state's attorney, and he represents the laws of North Carolina, irrespective of his political desires. |
I DID NOT vote for the Marriage Amendment because, while I don't approve of homosexual activity, those who are bent that way still have their freedom to choose their way and be legally united. The voters of this state are easily persuaded when you pull our our Patron Saint at the last minute, Billy Graham, to say he is for it.
Sorry folks, I think for myself. If Jesus said, "Homosexuals are in sin and headed to hell," I would follow Him. He said NOTHING so I say nothing but, "Love one another as God loves you / forgive one another." We are a divided state --- as all others --- on such a volatile matter. It is tantamount to Slavery in volatility. If our AG advocated for slavery, he would be roasted over a hot fire. On the other hand, the ones so homophobic as to hate gays, are holding them in slavery to southern prejudice (pronounced in public / while we know and tolerate them in local communities = pretense / hippocracy! |
With the greatest of respect, I am not someone who hangs on Pat Robertson's every word.
|
Dear Commissioners, July 30, 2014 | The Daily Haymaker Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics | Congressman Walter Jones takes action |