No, Fracking Won't Make Your Water Burn | Beaufort County Now | An iconic image in the propaganda war against hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") is that of flammable tap water. Water you can light on fire. It is a calculated image to terrify. | fracking,Gasland,Marcellus Shale,Josh Fox,Steven Lipsky,Alisa Rich,Cabot,PADEP,EPA,hydraulic fracturing,flammable,tap water,groundwater

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

No, Fracking Won't Make Your Water Burn

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Jon Sanders, who is Director of Regulatory Studies for the John Locke Foundation. He is also a contributor to the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

    RALEIGH     An iconic image in the propaganda war against hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") is that of flammable tap water. Water you can light on fire. It is a calculated image to terrify.

    Examples include the famous scene in the 2010 movie "Gasland," in which a Colorado man lights his faucet water on fire, a scene in the 2013 sequel "Gasland Part II," in which a Texas man sets the end of his garden hose ablaze, and YouTube videos from Pennsylvania and New York residents.

Blame nature, not fracking

    The water is "flammable" because it also contains methane, and those campaigning against natural gas extraction through hydraulic fracturing want people to blame fracking for it.

    Their problem is, methane is nontoxic and naturally occurring in the groundwater in many places. As the U.S. Geological Survey has explained, "Reports from the 1800s document gas bubbles in water wells, in streams, and in fields after heavy rains; this evidence suggests that migration has always existed." Alaskan scientists have even demonstrated lighting methane migration from frozen lakes.

    Back in 2008, residents in Dimock, a small community in Susquehanna County, Penn., on the highly productive Marcellus Shale formation, began complaining of the quality of drinking water from their water wells. Testing revealed heavy concentrations of methane. It was also said that one water well exploded and that toxic chemicals were also found in the water.

    Dimock subsequently became "ground zero" in the fight against fracking. Residents reached a financial settlement worth nearly $4.2 million with the mining company, Cabot Oil and Gas.

    Nevertheless, an analysis by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP, to which Cabot also paid over $1 million in penalties) "determined that nearby gas well hydro fracturing activity has not impacted local wells."

    Further investigations cast doubt that the alleged well explosion had even occurred. According to their sworn affidavits, the fire chief and the emergency managing agency director who responded to the call about the well explosion both found no evidence on the scene of a fire or incendiary explosion in the well pit.

    Peer-reviewed research in the May/June 2013 issue of the scientific journal Groundwater tested 1,701 wells and concluded that hydraulic fracturing was not responsible for the methane in the wells, that methane is and has been prevalent in the groundwater in Susquehanna County for hundreds of years, and that the well gases were consistent with upper formation gases, not Marcellus Shale gases.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency conducted its own survey of drinking water in Dimock, and it concluded in 2012 that there were not levels of contaminants present that warranted additional action by the EPA. PADEP subsequently allowed Cabot to resume drilling there.

Seeking to 'alarm the public into believing the water is burning'

    With respect to "Gasland," the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission had investigated the property two years before the movie was released. They found "no indications of oil & gas-related impacts to water well."

    Still, regulators returned after the movie and retested, again finding "biogenic gas that was not related to oil and gas activity" — and furthermore found evidence that the methane had long been present. That included "a 1976 publication by the Colorado Division of Water Resources states that the aquifer contains 'troublesome amounts of ... methane.'"

    "Gasland" director Josh Fox publicly admitted on camera that he knew about those findings but chose to leave them out because he considered them "not relevant." As he stated, "I don't care about the report from 1976. There are reports from 1936 where people say they could light their water on fire in New York state. But that's no bearing on their situation, at all."

    Fox outdid his deliberate deception from "Gasland" in the sequel. The flaming garden hose of "Gasland Part II" had been deliberately attached to a gas vent.

    As with the first movie, state regulators had already investigated water in the area (this time Parker County, Texas). What they had found was — again — the source of methane was natural seepage and that natural gas wells were "not causing or contributing to contamination of any Parker County domestic water wells."

    Going further, in 2012 a Texas District Court ruled that the landowner in the video had conspired with others expressly to "alarm the public" and "alarm the EPA." Quoting the court (emphasis added):

  • The Court references with concern the actions of Mr. Steven Lipsky, under the advice or direction of Ms. Alisa Rich, to intentionally attach a garden hose to a gas vent — not to a water line — and then light and burn the gas from the end nozzle of the hose. This demonstration was not done for scientific study but to provide local and national news media a deceptive video, calculated to alarm the public into believing the water was burning. There is further evidence that Rich knew the regional EPA administration and provided or assisted in providing additional misleading information (including the garden hose video) to alarm the EPA."

    The court furthermore concluded that all the evidence of this deception, including emails calling it a "strategy," were such that a reasonable person could conclude that they were "elements of a conspiracy to defame" the oil and gas company.




Comment

( August 6th, 2014 @ 8:05 am )
 
Would it be wiser to say, "We don't yet know all the hazards of Fracking?"

I lived new the central landfill for Nash County. It is on Duke Road and I lived at 4640. It was slightly north and uphill from that unlined dump made before they knew anything about seepage into ground water. It was a new technology and "they didn't know."

It is a "monitored dump site." I carried my trash to the bins every few days. They had places for used motor oil / batteries / a sign up about removing compressors from refrigerators before putting them in. Some folks took a look over their shoulder indicating something was in that bag not supposed to be there. The Monitor employee could not closely inspect every single item.

They decided to close the old section and put dirt over it ~~~ with gas vents for methane. Now they had to put a water system in because wells around were testing positive for dangerous substances.

The public was being served, but the unknown became a bear in the woods. I'm just not convinced we have a solid case for sucking the last drop of fossil fuel from dirt.

I KNOW FOR SURE solar energy is safe. We now have 2 such arrays on my path from Bayview to Nash County where I still have friends.

Why not simply develop other fuel technologies we KNOW ARE SAFE???

Why the felony offense if anyone in NC divulges the chemicals used in the process?????

It's too late baby when the closed over landfill is polluting the ground water and they "just didn't know" ~~~ or do they know and keep it secret until big bucks are made?????

Love Canal is now uninhabitable, but big money was made disposing dangerous chemicals there which continue to leach into the water!!! I'll be glad to see if I can find some good cheap land for this writer. He can get lots of it at Love Canal. If he really believes big business is watching out for the environment and people, he can live there and monitor their progress!



Post-tenure review: a rubber stamp, a way to enhance accountability, or none of the above? Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Sometimes the Best Option is to Cut Your Losses and Move On


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Key staffers admit they were intent on getting Trump out of office
There are great many problems that we face in this country today that have a direct bearing on the survivability of the United States and the freedoms of its people.
Naomi Lim of the Washington Examiner challenges President Biden’s assertion that he knows what Congress will accept in moving forward with bipartisan deals on major issues.
Today, Governor Roy Cooper announced that Damion McCullers has been appointed as a District Court Judge to Judicial Court 10F, which serves Wake County.
Collin Anderson of the Washington Free Beacon highlights inconvenient facts for solar energy advocates.
Just a reminder that the 3rd Congressional District Convention will be held this Saturday, April 17, 2021 at the New Bern Riverfront Convention Center.
Every North Carolinian who pays personal income tax would see a lower rate, under a proposal from legislative Republicans.

HbAD1

 
Back to Top