More Map Act News | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Jon Guze, who is the Director of Legal Studies for the John Locke Foundation.

    A couple of weeks ago I discussed an excellent NC Court of Appeals decision in which the Court held that development moratoria imposed under the Map Act constitute takings for which just compensation must be paid. Today I'm happy to report that the General Assembly is already responding to that holding in positive ways.

    HB 127, which is sponsored by Reps. Stam, Jackson, and Bryan, is primarily aimed at reforming DOT condemnation rules. However, it also includes a provision that would "reduce to one hundred eighty days any delay of a building permit issuance due to the transportation corridor official map act." Given that the current law allows permits to be delayed for up to three years, this is certainly an improvement as far as it goes; however, it does not go nearly far enough.

    In Kirby v. NCDOT, the DOT argued that the Map Act merely "creates a temporary three-year restriction on new improvements to properties located within the mapped corridor," but the Court rejected this argument. It pointed out that the restrictions do not begin to apply when and if a property owner decides to apply for a permit. They begin "upon the filing with the register of deeds of a...transportation corridor map," and they "never expire." The fact that a property owner may, in theory, force the DOT to either issue a permit or condemn a parcel by applying for a permit and waiting for a prescribed period of time does not change matters. The Map Act prohibition on the issuance of permits is, as the Court says, "absolute." Any application for a building or subdivision permit would therefore be futile, and requiring property owners to go through the expensive charade of preparing and filing imaginary building or subdivision plans simply in order to force the DOT to condemn their property within a finite period of time is almost certainly a violation of due process in itself.

    The Court held that, notwithstanding the three-year permit delay provision, "NCDOT exercised its power of eminent domain when it filed the transportation corridor maps" and it must pay compensation to the affected property owners for the entire time their property has been encumbered. Changing the permit delay period will not save the Map Act. Either strict limits on the total period of encumbrance will have to be imposed, or provisions will have to be made for the payment of just compensation whenever the period of encumbrance exceeds such limits. A much better solution, however, would be the one the John Locke Foundation has been advocating for years: repeal the Map Act in its entirety. I'm delighted, therefore, to report that Reps. R. Brown, Conrad, Lambeth, and Watford have sponsored a bill — HB 183 — that does exactly that. It repeals the various sections of the General Statutes that pertain to the Map Act, and it gives the DOT six months within which to "study the development of a process for acquiring land for future highway construction that is in accordance with...Kirby v. NCDOT."

    Repealing the Map Act is unquestionably the right way to go. Thirty-seven states manage to build highways without abusing property owners in this way. North Carolina can too!
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Study: N.C. Renewable Mandate Costs Jobs, Income John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Bad Bill Of The Week: Pork Is On The Menu


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

amnesty would just encourage more illegal aliens to storm our borders
The Christmas candy was barely off the shelves when the Valentine’s candy appeared. Red and pink hearts with caramel and nut-filled chocolate goodness caught our eye. We are reminded of how we love love. Young love, especially.
far left sugar daddy has also funded anti-Israel groups and politicians in US
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
America needs to wake up and get its priorities right
Former President Donald Trump suggested this week that if he becomes president again, he might allow Prince Harry to be deported.
It's a New Year, which means it's time to make resolutions — even for prominent evangelical leaders. The Babylon Bee asked the following well-known figures in the faith what they hope to accomplish in 2024:
Vice President Kamala Harris will visit a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic, reportedly the first time a president or vice president has visited an abortion facility.
An eight-mile stretch of the Blue Ridge Parkway near Asheville has been temporarily closed due to a string of “human and bear interactions,” the National Parks Service announced.

HbAD1

University of Wisconsin tried to punish conservatives for the fact that liberals regularly commit crimes to silence opposition
most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration
Come from behind by GOP candidate is a blueprint to 2024
Biden spending and energy policies to blame
Tuberculosis carried by illegal invaders has already infected Texas cattle
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said this week that the only campaign promise President Joe Biden has delivered on as president is the complete dismantling of the U.S. southern border.
Hamas is reeling after losing two of their most cherished leaders on the same day: military commander Saleh al-Arouri, and Harvard President Claudine Gay.
President Joe Biden’s brother told the Internal Revenue Service that Hunter Biden told him he was in business with a “protege of President Xi,” referring to the leader of China, according to notes by an IRS investigator that were divulged during a congressional interview of Jim Biden.

HbAD2

 
Back to Top