State Superintendent Responds to State Board of Education Lawsuit | Eastern North Carolina Now

Conflict between the State Board of Education, the state superintendent of public instruction, and the General Assembly may not be resolved anytime soon

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Kari Travis, who is an associate editor for the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

In court filing, Johnson says state board is under control of General Assembly and lawmakers can alter board's functions


    RALEIGH - Conflict between the State Board of Education, the state superintendent of public instruction, and the General Assembly may not be resolved anytime soon.

    The rub started last year when lawmakers stripped the board of some of its powers, handing them over to newly elected Superintendent Mark Johnson, a Republican who replaced former June Atkinson, a Democrat.

    Board members in December 2016 filed a lawsuit against Johnson and the General Assembly, saying that the legislation, House Bill 17, was unconstitutional.

    The lawsuit is on hold until June.

    On April 12, Johnson filed a legal response to the lawsuit asking the court to decide without a trial.

    "In its amended complaint the State Board stakes an aggressive claim to inviolable authority over essentially every aspect of North Carolina's public schools," Johnson's brief states.

    "This claim, however, is based upon a misrepresentation of ... the Constitution of North Carolina, because it ignores that the people, in creating the State Board, made it wholly subservient and auxiliary to the General Assembly."

    But state board Chairman Bill Cobey in December told Carolina Journal H.B. 17 isn't constitutionally sound.

    "We [don't like] the fact that we would have nothing to say about the top administrators in the department," Cobey said. "We believe we have the right to determine that, since the superintendent is our chief administrative officer, and we are charged in the constitution with supervising and administering a free public school system."

    The case in now in the hands of the three-judge panel appointed in January by Supreme Court Chief Justice Mark Martin.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Are North Carolina Distillers Simply Ahead of the Curve? Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Treasurer Plans to Save NC Millions


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Please attend the public meetings and speak out against closing the Snowden school in Aurora.
this undemocratic attempt to seize presidential power for themselves must be crushed
filed by former lawmaker from small center-right Free Democrats

HbAD1

Commissioner Richardson requests information regarding the new Washington school from BCS Superintendent
parental rights at stake, schools allowed no opt outs for parents
Demcorats took unpopular radical positions to please Soros pressure groups
“California accounted for 68% of the unemployment benefits paid to parolees identified by CBP on the terrorist watchlist or with criminal records.”
the votes are not there in the Senate, but that will not stop subpoenas from the House

HbAD2

 
Back to Top