Medicaid Frills Cost NC Billions, but GA May Shy Away from Cuts | Eastern North Carolina Now

   Publisher's note: This post, by Matt Willoughby, was originally published in the Healthcare section of Civitas's online edition.

    Medicaid services not required by the federal government but approved by the state legislature in years past cost $4.4 billion in 2010-2011. That accounted for 46 percent of the $10 billion Medicaid budget. North Carolina's Medicaid program was referred to as a "Cadillac" program in a study by the Lewin Group a few years ago.

    •The most expensive of the optional services include:

    •Prescription drugs: $1.1 billion
    •Community alternative programs: $809.6 million
    •Mental health: $752.7 million
    •Intermediate care facilities: $482.1 million
    •Personal care: $436.7 million

    Other optional services include adult dental care ($143.3 million), physical, occupational and speech therapies ($84.6 million), private duty nursing ($69.2 million), hospice care ($66.6 million), case management ($73 million), transportation ($47.6 million), orthotics and prosthetics ($19 million), routine adult eye exams ($8.4 million), podiatry ($5.5 million), adult visual aids ($5 million), chiropractor ($1.5 million) and hearing aids ($96,303).

    Health and Human Services budget writers at the General Assembly have been told there is about a $150 million shortfall in funding to meet expected Medicaid expenses in the 2012-2013 fiscal year. North Carolina could also come up short nearly $400 million more if the state loses a legal quarrel with the federal government over personal services.

    House Health and Human Services budget committee chair Rep. Justin Burr (R-Stanly) says that despite the search for savings, optional services won't be cut or eliminated.



    Burr's committee was given an adjusted budget target that was $63 million lower than the appropriation for the 2012-2013 fiscal year.

    Some lawmakers say no one is going to cut services during an important election year. Health care providers aren't taking any chances. They want to make sure they are part of the conversation. Members of the Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, for example, received a total of about $300,000 in campaign contributions in 2010-2011 from medical interests.

    That's not unusual. Democrats received large contributions from health care providers when they wrote the budget. Also some of the committee members are also members of the medical industry, so routinely receive support from colleagues.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Nutrition Board Closes Complaint Against Blogger Days After Press Inquiry Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Election Day in Beaufort County


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

populist / nationalist anti-immigration AfD most popular party among young voters, CDU second
Barr had previously said he would jump off a bridge before supporting Trump
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD1

Decision is a win for election integrity. NC should do the same.
Biden regime intends to force public school compliance as well as colleges
prosecutors appeal acquittal of member of parliament in lower court for posting Bible verse
Biden abuses power to turn statute on its head; womens groups to sue
The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do

HbAD2

 
Back to Top