Beaufort Observer | Eastern NC Now

All of those judges appointed by Biden's autopen were DEI hires. Whoever was using that autopen with Biden's name did NOT appoint white straight Christian men even if they were liberals. That is how we got specimens like this loony dirtbag Judge Sparkle.

The Biden judges as a whole are even worse than the Obama judges, who were bad enough. Maybe all of them should be removed because of the autopen appointments. It has been discovered that several people authorized use of that autopen and Biden often did not even know it. All of those appointments should be declared null and void and the judgeships vacant.

Commented: Wednesday, July 8th, 2026 @ 12:34 pm By: Conservative Voter

Judge Sparkle is absolutely unethical. She is foreign born and was using her power to let foreign born persons vote when they were not legally entitled to vote. She had a massive conflict of interest in handling this case, and she failed to recuse herself. She needs to be r3emoved from her judgeship, and while they are at it, stripping her of her citizenship and sending her back wherever she came from would also be appropriate. America does not need kangaroo court judges like Sparkle.

Commented: Wednesday, July 8th, 2026 @ 9:17 am By: borderhawk

Buzz, precedent is a key feature of English Common Law, which was adopted as it then existed in 1776 by the 13 colonies, and subsequently by the new United States and by all but one of the subsequent states. The exception is Louisiana, whose state law is based on France's Code Napoleon. That said, common law precedents are trumped by statute and even more so by the Constitution. Precedent is a factor in the SCOTUS following past interpretations of Constitutional or statutory provisions, but they are not bound by it.

The problem in the birthright citizenship case was a precedent that involved a child born to foreign citizens who were lawfully in the United States. That should have been a precedent as to Green Card holders but NOT as to illegal aliens or tourists. Even after ratification of the 14th Amendment, American Indians were not considered US citizens and a special law had to be passed to make them citizens. Since that was required for people whose ancestors had been in America longer than anybody else, something similar should have been required as to children of people who are illegally here in the first place. I am appalled at the positions of Roberts and Barrett in this case. Four justices correctly ruled that the 14th Amendment does not make the children of tourists and illegal aliens US citizens.

Commented: Tuesday, July 7th, 2026 @ 1:07 pm By: Steven P. Rader