Judicial Watch Files Suit After Secret Service Admits To Destroying Records Related To Alleged Biden Altercation With Secret Service Agent | Beaufort County Now | Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security | judicial watch, lawsuit, secret service, destroying records, joe biden, september 4, 2020

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Judicial Watch Files Suit After Secret Service Admits To Destroying Records Related To Alleged Biden Altercation With Secret Service Agent

Press Release:

    Washington, DC     Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for records that the Secret Service claims to have destroyed related to a reported physical altercation between a Secret Service Agent and Joe Biden at a photo op in 2009 (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:20-cv-02457)).

    The lawsuit was filed after the Secret Service failed to respond to a July 14, 2020 administrative appeal challenging its claim that all files related to the 2009 altercation, "ha[d] been destroyed," due to "retention standards."

    On March 29, 2020, the Gateway Pundit republished a 2017 report alleging that an unidentified Secret Service agent was suspended for a week in 2009 for "shoving Biden after he cupped his girlfriend's breast while the couple was taking a photo with him." "The situation got so heated ... that others had to step in to prevent the agent from hitting the then-Vice President," according to the report.

    Judicial Watch's FOIA request, made on May 12, 2020, sought:

  • All records related to a reported incident in 2009 in which a United States Secret Service Agent reportedly was involved in an altercation with, or attempted to strike, then Vice President Joe Biden during a photo opportunity.
  • The records sought shall include, but not be limited to, witness statements, the Agent's statement, victim's statement, alleged perpetrator's statement, incident reports, investigative reports, communications among USSS personnel regarding the incident, and disciplinary records related to the incident for the Agent in question.

    In a July 13, 2020 response to Judicial Watch's request, the Secret Service appeared to confirm that a file on the alleged incident existed at some point, asserting, "[T]here are no responsive records or documents pertaining to your request in our files," because "the above mentioned file(s) has been destroyed" due to "retention standards." The Secret Service added that, "[n]o additional information is available." It did not deny the incident had occurred. In its lawsuit, Judicial Watch intends to test the Secret Service's assertion that it destroyed all records about the incident.

    "We had not been able to confirm whether the report about the alleged altercation might be true until the Secret Service itself suggested it destroyed records about the incident," stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Inez Feltscher Stepman writes for the Federalist about the odd cast of characters engaged in the recent Capitol violence.
Mairead McArdle writes for National Review Online about one high-profile Republican senator’s response to the second impeachment of Donald Trump.
A Texas man who took part in the Capitol riots earlier this month has been hit with new charges related to him allegedly threatening to “assassinate” the radically liberal Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).
Today, America's second Fake Impeachment of Donald J. Trump, just days before he leaves office, may speak more about those Impeaching the President than he who is indicted.
Days after leaving office, former President Donald Trump has reportedly floated the idea of forming his own political party.
On Monday night, GOP Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell declared that his battle to keep the Senate filibuster in place had been won.
We will offer this allotment of three with more to come; some old, most new, but all quite informative, and, moreover, necessary to understanding that in North Carolina, there is a wiser path to govern ourselves and our People.
Cindy McCain, the widow of the late Republican Senator John McCain, has broken her silence after being censored by the Arizona GOP for supporting Joe Biden over Donald Trump in the last presidential election.

HbAD1

In a letter the local directors spell out the shortcomings of the state's mismanagement of the supply of vaccines
N.C. Attorney General Josh Stein wants lawmakers to use millions won from a settlement with Dish Network for violating telemarketing laws to expand internet access for students, but legislative leaders are so far non-committal on the proposal.
Vivek Saxena reports for BizPac Review about the reaction among unions to President Biden‘s first actions in office.
The Supreme Court tossed two lawsuits accusing former President Donald Trump of violating the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution on Monday, ending a roughly four-year legal battle over the former president’s businesses.
So much is made of the Cancel Culture, which is as real as Trump Derangement Syndrome; however, the Impeachment Culture, as an offshoot of this Cancel Culture, has NOW won the day for the religiously Woke.
As courthouses begin to reopen across North Carolina, the state’s judicial branch office is preparing to request millions of dollars in funding to help keep them open.
Every now and then I come across a story that reaches into my heart and tugs and tugs and tugs.

HbAD2

Now that President Biden has been sworn in as the 46th president, he wants to hit the ground running and attend to urgent priorities.
Now that Democrats control the White House and both chambers of Congress (however narrowly), they will probably approve a new round of federal borrowing to bail out state and local governments with shaky finances.
Scientists are completing work on a nasal spray that can prevent COVID-19 for up to two days and it could hit the market by summer, according to a new report.
Judicial Watch’s Twitter account was purged of nearly 200,000 followers, and I’ve lost over 10 percent of my followers.
Mary Kay Linge writes for the New York Post about one U.S. senator’s interesting take on the second impeachment of Donald Trump.
Yes, it’s January, not June, and you may feel as if you’re finally settling into a routine during a challenging school year.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top