Did You Know? The UK Wants Free Speech on Campus | Beaufort County Now | In a new law that will change the direction of higher education in the United Kingdom, the British government is drafting the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill, which might require universities to defend free speech and freedom of expression.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of The James G. Martin Center. The author of this post is Sumantra Maitra.

    In a new law that will change the direction of higher education in the United Kingdom, the British government is drafting the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill, which might require universities to defend free speech and freedom of expression.

    The British political system lacks the First Amendment protections for free speech like the American system, and this difference is visible in the increasingly hostile higher ed sector-where ideological orthodoxy resulted in a monoculture. The new bill, for the first time in British history, will be used to fill that free speech gap.

    The bill ensures that universities and colleges are registered with the Office for Students to stop de-platforming, silencing, or other such ways of intimidation. The bill also makes universities responsible for ensuring the neutral public sphere, as well as requiring student unions to ensure balance and lawful freedom of speech.

    Failure to ensure such neutrality or carry out legal duties would result in fines and other punitive measures, such as sanctions.

    The bill also requires all registered higher education providers in England to not just ensure free speech and academic freedom, but also promote these values to students.

    In a sense, the bill's supporters are using the same tactics used by universities to justify diversity initiatives and more money for the ideological university bureaucracy. For example, a core set of equalities law were used by previous Labour governments to ensure that universities follow all diversity initiatives or else risk sanctions. The current conservative government is reversing the role, using the same tactic to ensure universities promote free speech and academic freedom.

    Given that Britain is a parliamentary system with an unwritten constitution that is based on legal precedents, everything starts with definitions. Accordingly, this bill defines "academic freedom" to be freedom within the law and within their fields of expertise to

  1. question and test received wisdom, and
  2. put forward new ideas and controversial and unpopular opinions without placing oneself at the risk of being affected, by either loss of jobs or privilege, or loss of the likelihood of securing promotion and different jobs.

    The definition clause raised some eyebrows, due to its overly complicated wording, especially with the "field of expertise" clause.

    The British left has vocally opposed the measure. Critics have warned that this will ensure a torrent of lawsuits against university admins and radical students. The government is also accused of fomenting a culture war. The ruling conservatives, meanwhile, have argued that such measures are a market correction and that such corrections are necessary to create a semblance of balance in a system already skewed too far to the left.

    Britain has been rocked by recent controversies, much like the rest of the Anglosphere. There has been a campaign of silencing initiated against scholars like Eric Kaufmann and orchestrated by student unions that are supported by a section of academics. In another instance, academics in King's College were angered by an email that had the photo of the recently deceased HRH Prince Phillip, which resulted in an apology from the university administration.

    This bill is in effect the first salvo from the ruling conservative government to stall what it considers a steady drift toward ideological conformity on campus. In a way, it follows the American trend where various states have enacted similar legislation.

    Sumantra Maitra is a doctoral scholar at the University of Nottingham, UK; he is a columnist for Providence Magazine and a senior contributor to The Federalist.
Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

In November 2020, Iowa GOP candidate Mariannette Miller-Meeks faced off against Democratic nominee Rita Hart in an incredibly close Congressional election in which Miller-Meeks won by a minuscule six votes.
The list of Democrats retiring just keeps growing. From the U.S. House to the North Carolina House, Democrats are running scared because they know their chances of winning are dwindling just like Joe Biden’s approval ratings.
I have been following the Sheppard case and the Franks case the last couple of years with a somewhat dispassionate interest. The wheels of justice grind and they do grind slow.
House Republicans, led by Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), have sent a letter to Biden administration Attorney General Merrick Garland calling his recent schools memo an effort to weaponize the DOJ and curb Constitutional rights.
Today, U.S. Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) and 49 Senate Republican colleagues filed a formal challenge against President Biden's vaccine mandate under the Congressional Review Act.
Last week, the UNC Board of Governors met at NC State’s Hunt Library for its November meeting.


Amid the shopping bags, holiday music, and twinkle lights, smash and grab crime videos are plaguing the retail season this year.
The parents of the suspect accused of shooting up a high school in Michigan were hit with involuntary manslaughter charges on Friday, prosecutors announced.
If you are covering Kamala Harris’ visit to Charlotte today, please consider the following statement from the Republican National Committee
Democrat Rep. Rashida Tlaib (MI) effectively admitted on Wednesday that she only wears a mask when there are cameras around, which undercuts a number of public statements she has made about the importance of wearing masks.
In a letter a few weeks ago, State Auditor Beth Wood insisted that applications to purchase the Bald Head Island ferry (System) by the Village of Bald Head Island (Village) and the Bald Head Island Transportation Authority (Authority) not be included in the December Local Government Commission (LGC)



Back to Top