N.C. Supreme Court blocks candidate filing, delays all primary elections to May | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    The N.C. Supreme Court has jumped into the state's legal battle over new election maps. The high court has shut down candidate filing and delayed all state primary elections until May 17.

    The high court wants a trial court to rule on the merits of two ongoing redistricting lawsuits by Jan. 11.

    "In light of the great public interest in the subject matter of these cases, the importance of the issues to the constitutional jurisprudence of this State, and the need for urgency in reaching a final resolution on the merits at the earliest possible opportunity, the Court grants a preliminary injunction and temporarily stays the candidate-filing period for the 2022 elections for all offices until such time as a final judgment on the merits of plaintiffs' claims, including any appeals, is entered and a remedy, if any is required, has been ordered," according to the Supreme Court's order.

    The order blocks the state's scheduled March 8, 2022, primary election. "[D]efendants instead are directed to hold primaries for all offices on Tuesday, May 17, 2022," according to the order. "The trial court is authorized to issue any orders necessary to accomplish the resulting changes in the election schedule, including implementing shortened filing periods and other administrative adjustments."

    The order explains what happens to candidates who already have filed this week for next year's elections. "Any individual who has already filed to run for public office in 2022 and whose filing has been accepted by the appropriate board of elections, will be deemed to have filed for the same office under the new election schedule for the May 2022 primary unless they provide timely notice of withdrawal of their candidacy to the board of elections during the newly-established filing period," the Supreme Court orders.

    There is one exception: candidates whose districts get thrown out if the courts force lawmakers to redraw state election maps. In the court's words, a candidate is not deemed to have filed "to the extent that a remedy in this matter, if any, impacts a candidate's eligibility to hold the office for which they have currently filed. Any individual who has properly withdrawn their candidacy is free to file for any other office for which they may be eligible during the reopened filing period."

    The Supreme Court wants action within a month on resolving the redistricting complaints through a trial. "The trial court is directed to hold proceedings necessary to reach a ruling on the merits of plaintiffs' claims and to provide a written ruling on or before Tuesday, January 11, 2022."

    An appeal from that trial court ruling must be filed with the Supreme Court within two days. The process will bypass the intermediate-level N.C. Court of Appeals.

    The Supreme Court's ruling responds to a request from redistricting challengers in two lawsuits. Both sets of plaintiffs had asked the high court to intervene after the full 15-member Appeals Court had rejected their attempts to shut down candidate filing.

    In both cases, challengers argue that new state election maps violate the state constitution because of gerrymandering. Plaintiffs want maps for North Carolina's congressional delegation, N.C. House, and N.C Senate to be thrown out.

    A state Senate redistricting leader criticized the order. "The court did not cite any basis in law for its move and did not criticize the maps," according to a news release from Sen, Ralph Hise, R-Mitchell. "It reached its secretive decision based only on two affidavits. The secretive, unnamed decision only states that elections are blocked because the case is 'important' and of 'public interest.'"

    Hise refers to the fact the order does not indicate how the Supreme Court voted in reaching its decision. While the order is signed by Justice Tamara Barringer according to the clerk of court, the signature is difficult to read.

    "The court didn't even articulate a legal or factual basis for suspending elections," Hise said. "The Democrats on the Supreme Court want districts that elect more Democrats, so they're blocking every election in the state until they get their way."
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Legislative defendants respond to redistricting challengers in N.C. Supreme Court Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics N.C. budget includes $100 million teacher pay supplement for lower-wealth counties


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
Come from behind by GOP candidate is a blueprint to 2024
Biden spending and energy policies to blame
Tuberculosis carried by illegal invaders has already infected Texas cattle

HbAD1

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said this week that the only campaign promise President Joe Biden has delivered on as president is the complete dismantling of the U.S. southern border.
Hamas is reeling after losing two of their most cherished leaders on the same day: military commander Saleh al-Arouri, and Harvard President Claudine Gay.
President Joe Biden’s brother told the Internal Revenue Service that Hunter Biden told him he was in business with a “protege of President Xi,” referring to the leader of China, according to notes by an IRS investigator that were divulged during a congressional interview of Jim Biden.
Gov. Roy Cooper seeks a temporary restraining order to block a law changing the composition of the State Board of Elections.
X owner Elon Musk mocked a news segment from ABC News this week that promoted President Joe Biden’s talking points about the Democrat-led Senate’s failed border bill, which critics and many experts have said would make the situation on the border worse.
That’s the question Marguerite Roza of Georgetown University’s Edunomics Lab sought to answer in a recent webinar on the topic.

HbAD2

The University of Florida has fired all of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) employees and shut down its DEI office.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top