Comment Submitted in Response to Proposed Charter School Program Rules | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Dr. Terry Stoops.

    I strongly oppose proposed rules that would impose onerous and ultimately harmful requirements for competitive grants under the federal Charter Schools Program.

    The proposed "community impact analysis" is among the most objectionable of the proposed Charter Schools Program regulations. I do not believe that anonymous grant reviewers will offer fair and meaningful analyses employing qualitative, quantitative, and survey data to assess the actual educational and economic effects of public charter schools in a community.

    As a member of the North Carolina Charter Schools Advisory Board, I have reviewed dozens of impact statements submitted as part of the charter school application process. Unsurprisingly, most charter school "impacts" described by districts in these documents feature lists of recycled grievances about increased competition, which is the presumptive response from those supporting institutions exposed to very little of it.

    The typical objection in an impact statement is that a competitive educational market will allow per-student allotments to follow children to their schools of choice. This is undeniably true and far from the point. Implicitly, such objections signal an interest in securing the district's financial interests rather than meeting children's academic and social-emotional needs. Indeed, parents who find their district-assigned school to be satisfactory will have no desire to seek alternatives. More importantly, if the demand did not exist, my North Carolina Charter Schools Advisory Board colleagues and I would have no justification for recommending the approval of new charter schools.

    Additionally, regulations that give priority to Charter Schools Program applicants that "partner" with a school district ignore instances when such cooperation is not possible. While voluntary charter-district partnerships facilitate the exchange of information and best practices, there are few incentives for a school district to accept a proposed collaborative agreement with a charter school. After all, charters are their direct competitor for students and resources. Incompatible missions, political barriers, logistical factors, and other practical concerns impede successful partnerships between districts and charter schools.

    All public charter schools should qualify for Charter Schools Program grants without sacrificing the essential freedoms granted to them to operate in ways that benefit the students they serve. These latest efforts to find new ways to slam the federal regulatory sledgehammer on the citizens, educators, and entrepreneurs - the people who form the core of the charter school movement - will satisfy the education establishment. But these politically motivated regulations will harm the millions of children who receive an outstanding education in public charter schools.

    The most sensible public policy response to public charter schools is simple: leverage federal funds to support promising instructional models, teaching methods, and institutional configurations that benefit children regardless of the objections of entrenched interests seeking to crush successful alternatives.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




March Jobs Report John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics The US Test Mess


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Pope Francis lambasted leftist gender ideology during an address this week, warning that it presented an extreme danger to mankind.
amnesty would just encourage more illegal aliens to storm our borders
The Christmas candy was barely off the shelves when the Valentine’s candy appeared. Red and pink hearts with caramel and nut-filled chocolate goodness caught our eye. We are reminded of how we love love. Young love, especially.
far left sugar daddy has also funded anti-Israel groups and politicians in US
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
America needs to wake up and get its priorities right
Former President Donald Trump suggested this week that if he becomes president again, he might allow Prince Harry to be deported.
It's a New Year, which means it's time to make resolutions — even for prominent evangelical leaders. The Babylon Bee asked the following well-known figures in the faith what they hope to accomplish in 2024:

HbAD1

Vice President Kamala Harris will visit a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic, reportedly the first time a president or vice president has visited an abortion facility.
An eight-mile stretch of the Blue Ridge Parkway near Asheville has been temporarily closed due to a string of “human and bear interactions,” the National Parks Service announced.
University of Wisconsin tried to punish conservatives for the fact that liberals regularly commit crimes to silence opposition
most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration
Come from behind by GOP candidate is a blueprint to 2024
Biden spending and energy policies to blame
Tuberculosis carried by illegal invaders has already infected Texas cattle
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said this week that the only campaign promise President Joe Biden has delivered on as president is the complete dismantling of the U.S. southern border.

HbAD2

 
Back to Top