N.C. Appeals Court blocks ‘burdensome’ discovery in Opportunity Scholarship lawsuit | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    The N.C. Court of Appeals has issued new orders blocking all activity in a lawsuit challenging the state's Opportunity Scholarship Program. That includes "burdensome" discovery targeting multiple private schools.

    "All further proceedings in the above-captioned matter, including discovery, are hereby stayed pending this Court's ruling on the motion to dismiss" the case, according to one of two orders filed Tuesday. One responded to a request from state legislative leaders. The other addressed a petition from parents who support the scholarship program.

    Tuesday's orders in Kelly v. State of N.C. followed a temporary stay granted on March 24.

    Scholarship defenders had complained about the legal tactics employed by plaintiffs challenging OSP. Plaintiffs' lawyers had been engaging in "extensive," "burdensome, " and "voluminous third-party discovery into the religious beliefs and practices of dozens of private religious schools, " according to one court filing.

    Discovery refers to the exchange of information between parties in a legal proceeding. It helps determine the evidence that can be used during a trial.

    The Appeals Court is scheduled to decide whether the lawsuit will stay with Wake County Superior Court Judge Bryan Collins. Appellate judges could transfer the case instead to a three-judge panel.

    "This appeal is about who will decide whether or not to take away educational scholarships from thousands of low-income North Carolina children: a single trial court judge or a group of three judges," according to a motion filed by Marie Miller of the Institute for Justice. IJ represents parents defending OSP.

    "To avoid a single judge shutting down an entire statewide program based on a mistaken belief that it is unlawful, the North Carolina General Assembly decided that facial challenges to state laws 'shall be heard and determined by a three-judge panel,'" Miller added. "The trial court below, however, refused to transfer this lawsuit to a three-judge panel, even though the lawsuit seeks to dismantle the Opportunity Scholarship Program 'in its entirety.'"

    Discovery should not resume until the Appeals Court decides which court will proceed with the case, Miller argued.

    "[A]ppeals like this about who should 'hear and determine' a case inherently embrace things like overseeing discovery," Miller wrote. "It therefore makes sense to stay discovery proceedings while this Court resolves who should oversee them. Second, threshold questions about this case - including the legal sufficiency of the pleadings of many or all of Appellees' claims as well as the scope of discovery - cannot be answered until the pending appeal resolves which tribunal should answer those questions."

    "Most or all of Appellees' ongoing, voluminous discovery could turn out to be unnecessary, wasting not only the parties' time and resources, but also those of the dozens of private schools whose religious beliefs and practices are the primary target of Appellees' discovery," Miller added.

    The Opportunity Scholarship Program now helps more than 20,000 students from low-income families enroll in more than 500 private schools. With a larger available scholarship and expanded income eligibility in 2022-23, the program has seen about 9,500 new applicants for the coming school year. That's according to the group Parents for Educational Freedom in North Carolina.

    The Appeals Court's eventual choice between Collins or a three-judge panel depends on the nature of the lawsuit.

    Lead plaintiff Tamika Walker Kelly is the head of the N.C. Association of Educators, the state affiliate of the National Education Association teachers union. Teachers unions have been among the most vocal opponents of school choice programs like Opportunity Scholarships.

    Kelly and fellow critics argue that the Opportunity Scholarship Program is unconstitutional as applied to the circumstances of particular plaintiffs in the case. Scholarship defenders counter that the lawsuit is not actually an "as-applied" constitutional challenge. In contrast, it amounts to a "facial" challenge because it challenges the constitutionality of the scholarship law "on its face."

    State law requires "facial" challenges to be heard by three-judge panels appointed by the chief justice of the N.C. Supreme Court.

    The Opportunity Scholarship Program already has survived one facial challenge. In 2015 the state Supreme Court ruled, 4-3, that the program could proceed.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Carolina Journal by Video - CXXX: Former N.C. Chief Justice Mark Martin reacts to U.S. Supreme Court leak Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics N.C. Democrats mum on unprecedented leak in SCOTUS abortion case


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration
Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
Come from behind by GOP candidate is a blueprint to 2024
Biden spending and energy policies to blame
Tuberculosis carried by illegal invaders has already infected Texas cattle

HbAD1

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said this week that the only campaign promise President Joe Biden has delivered on as president is the complete dismantling of the U.S. southern border.
Hamas is reeling after losing two of their most cherished leaders on the same day: military commander Saleh al-Arouri, and Harvard President Claudine Gay.
President Joe Biden’s brother told the Internal Revenue Service that Hunter Biden told him he was in business with a “protege of President Xi,” referring to the leader of China, according to notes by an IRS investigator that were divulged during a congressional interview of Jim Biden.
Gov. Roy Cooper seeks a temporary restraining order to block a law changing the composition of the State Board of Elections.
X owner Elon Musk mocked a news segment from ABC News this week that promoted President Joe Biden’s talking points about the Democrat-led Senate’s failed border bill, which critics and many experts have said would make the situation on the border worse.
That’s the question Marguerite Roza of Georgetown University’s Edunomics Lab sought to answer in a recent webinar on the topic.

HbAD2

The University of Florida has fired all of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) employees and shut down its DEI office.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top