No, Biden, high gas prices don’t make us better off | Eastern North Carolina Now | On Sunday the American Institute for Economic Research published my piece on “Joe Biden’s Gasoline Saga,” which called out the president and his administration for pretending it’s a great thing we’re struggling with extremely high gasoline prices.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Jon Sanders.

    On Sunday the American Institute for Economic Research published my piece on "Joe Biden's Gasoline Saga," which called out the president and his administration for pretending it's a great thing we're struggling with extremely high gasoline prices. Why? Because they think it'll cause people to rush out and buy electric vehicles (EVs).

    At a joint press conference May 24 following his meeting with Prime Minister Kishida Fumio of Japan, Biden was asked about "enormously high gas prices" and whether Americans should "be prepared for a recession." Biden answered no, citing in part the promise of new jobs from transitioning away from gasoline. ...

    "Here's the situation," Biden said. "And when it comes to the gas prices, we're going through an incredible transition that is taking place that, God willing, when it's over, we'll be stronger and the world will be stronger and less reliant on fossil fuels when this is over."

    The belief that exorbitant prices are good because it means people will change their entire way of life is one of the responses in the Biden administration's rotation of pat responses to high gas prices, along with such things as blaming Putin and corporate greed. It was perhaps best displayed by the just-so smugness of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg's November 28, 2021, comments to MSNBC that families who own electric vehicles [EVs] "will never have to worry about gas prices again."

    On Tuesday yet another Biden administration official was seen touting this line. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm talked about how high gas prices made "a very compelling case" for buying an EV. She seemed to realize how awful she sounded mid-ramble, because she immediately pivoted back to trying to assuage drivers that, no, really, the administration cares and wants to do something about high gas prices:

    "If you filled up your EV and you filled up your gas tank with gasoline, you would save $60 per fill-up by going electric rather than using gasoline but it's a very compelling case,


    but again, we want to bring down the price at the point of purchase."

    As I wrote in AIER,

    Higher prices for gasoline and diesel mean it will cost people more than before to go places. They also mean that it will cost more to transport and produce goods, so people will also have to pay more for food, clothing, and other wants and needs. Our purchasing power has fallen. We are measurably worse off, especially the poorest among us who have fewer "luxury" items to sacrifice for necessities. But we're all having to make choices we otherwise would never make.

    Regardless of what the President says, this is not making us stronger and better off. It'd be one thing if EV makers were winning customers in the time-honored way of producing better goods at lower prices (bearing in mind that people's time is also a cost).

    But in the warped view of the Biden administration, the only way for people to see EVs as preferable to their gas-powered cars is to make gasoline prohibitively expensive. It shows how unpopular their "less reliance on fossil fuels" actually is, and that they know it. It bespeaks an "incredible transition" in the same way that "if you were the last man on earth" predicts masculine irresistibility. ...

    Also in real life, regardless of any benefits to EV makers, people will suffer great loss if gasoline prices drive them to the point of replacing their perfectly drivable gas-powered vehicles - which are expensive capital investments - with even more expensive EVs. Biden thinks such a "transition" would be "incredible." For the vast majority of us, it would be terrible.

Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

If you haven't noticed, the current Federal government has managed to confine you in an almost escape proof box.
Texas GOP Governor Greg Abbott, throwing down the gauntlet to two Democrat mayors who have recently complained about illegal immigrants, invited them to come to Texas and have a first-hand look at the crisis at the southern border.
Democratic Socialist place holder president, Joe Biden, visited a mostly far Left composite of this nation's county commissioners and spoke deeply to their Democratic Socialist hearts.
An upstate New York county library in June hosted a series of four events in which eleven to eighteen-year-olds could “learn the art of drag from a local drag queen.”
misnamed "inflation reduction act" to raise middle class taxes
will they bring down the Rutte government?


White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki responded to news reports from over the weekend that indicated that China had developed advanced nuclear-capable weapons systems by saying that the Biden administration “welcome[s] stiff competition.”
In an unprecedented move to protect the safety and security of millions of Americans, the FBI has added itself to the FBI watchlist.
state has started work to plug 1,000 foot gap in Yuma sector
On Monday the U.S. Supreme Court certified a June 30 ruling that would allow the Biden Administration to end former President Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” border policy.
Have you heard the latest? Uncle Joe is attempting to appropriate billions of dollars to a program designed to mandate that CRT is taught across the nation in OUR public schools.
Terrorism experts quickly downplayed Democrat President Joe Biden‘s attempts to count the CIA’s killing of Al Qaeda Ayman Al-Zawahiri in Afghanistan as a win for his administration, noting the fact that Al-Zawahiri was in Afghanistan at all means that the terrorist group has returned to the country


On July 8, Judge William Osteen, a federal judge appointed by President George W. Bush, gave all sides in the Bryant v. Woodall case 30 days to return briefs to the court on whether the injunction blocking North Carolina’s 20-week abortion ban should be lifted.


Back to Top