Did You Know? Post-Roe, UNC-Chapel Hill Has Struggled to Stay Neutral | Eastern North Carolina Now | One of the most important principles for preserving a spirit of inquiry, discovery, and discussion on university campuses is institutional neutrality.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of The James G. Martin Center. The author of this post is Jenna A. Robinson.

    One of the most important principles for preserving a spirit of inquiry, discovery, and discussion on university campuses is institutional neutrality. This means that, while individual faculty are free to say what they like, universities should not take positions as institutions (or as units within the institution) on divisive political matters.

    In 1967, the Kalven Committee issued its definitive report, declaring:

    To perform its mission in the society, a university must sustain an extraordinary environment of freedom of inquiry and maintain an independence from political fashions, passions, and pressures. A university, if it is to be true to its faith in intellectual inquiry, must embrace, be hospitable to, and encourage the widest diversity of views within its own community. It is a community but only for the limited, albeit great, purposes of teaching and research. It is not a club, it is not a trade association, it is not a lobby.

    Lamentably, this is a principle more honored in the breach than the observance. Universities regularly violate the principle of neutrality by divesting from fossil fuels, boycotting Israel, and mandating politicized common readings and DEI "trainings."

    The breach was severe at UNC-Chapel Hill following the Supreme Court's recent decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. Several departments shared, via official university communications channels, their vehement disagreement with the Court's ruling.

    On June 24, for instance, the UNC Gillings School of Public Health tweeted, "With its decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court set the clock back 50 years. Recent research has demonstrated harmful impacts for those in the U.S. who are denied abortions."

    Additionally, Dean Barbara K. Rimer wrote an article decrying the decision on the school's public webpage, saying, "It is a sad day."

    The university's DEI office also opined on the issue, in a tweet that was later taken down. As the screenshot pasted below indicates, the tweet committed to "protecting reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy for all."

    Not to be outdone, the Student Body President issued an executive order stating, "It is the official opinion of the Vann Administration that all people should have the right to make private decisions for their individual bodies and are entitled to comprehensive reproductive healthcare." The order further prohibited the Undergraduate Student Government Executive Branch's "contract[ing] or expend[ing] funds to any individual, business, or organization which actively advocates to further limit by law access to reproductive healthcare, including, though not limited to, contraception and induced abortions."

    The order, in addition to violating the principle of institutional neutrality, is probably illegal. Student government, which is funded by mandatory student fees, must distribute those fees in a viewpoint-neutral way. In Board of Regents, University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth, the Supreme Court opined, "When a university requires its students to pay fees to support the extracurricular speech of other students, all in the interest of open discussion, it may not prefer some viewpoints to others."

    To be clear, individual professors and students are free to write, tweet, and talk about their personal views on these issues in a variety of extramural outlets. But sharing those opinions on departmental webpages and communications channels, with the university's imprimatur, is a gross violation of institutional neutrality. Such communications degrade the environment of discussion and inquiry on campus. They should cease.

    Jenna A. Robinson is the president of the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal.

poll#152
With Roe v Wade (originated in 1973) overturned by the US Supreme Court, thereby allowing decisions on abortion legislation completely returned to the states: Where do you find your position on such a "Life and Death" issue for the American People?
  Yes, I approve of the US Supreme Court's decision to reinstate this "medical" issue back to the states' legislative responsibility to regulate.
  No, I believe that every woman should have complete access to abortion on demand.
  This issue is far beyond my intellectual capacity to understand.
236 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money
Country star Naomi Judd reportedly left full control of her estate and fortune, believed to be worth $25 million, to her husband Larry Strickland, earmarking nothing for her two daughters Ashley and Wynonna Judd.
The Carolina Journal makes a wide sweeping evaluation of the news that most effects us here in North Carolina, and is distilled, here on BCN, for your clear understanding by the electronic means of video broadcast.
President Joe Biden’s White House continues to distance itself from the Department of Justice’s raid on former President Donald Trump.
The upcoming general election (November, 2022): What is occurring on the national stage is effecting Beaufort County, and more than you realize.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki faced backlash on Monday afternoon after saying that the Biden administration welcomed “stiff competition” from communist China in response to a question about China obtaining advanced nuclear-capable weapons systems.

HbAD1

This week, Courtney Lindeen presented her husband Aaron with a bold and innovative plan to solve the family's consumer debt burden.
Bidenflation is hitting Americans across the board, according to a new study.
Former President Donald Trump responded to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland’s press conference Thursday afternoon by saying that the FBI raid on his property in Florida was not needed because his legal team had been cooperating with the Justice Department.
There has been little examination of the extent of the impacts of “environmentally friendly” offshore wind development on affected marine ecologies, habitats, fisheries, and wildlife
Legendary running back Herschel Walker, who is running as a Republican for the U.S. Senate seat in Georgia, denounced recent comments from former President Donald Trump after he said that Republicans would not vote in the next two elections if “we don’t solve the Presidential Election Fraud of 2020.
On Monday, the Biden administration announced that it would be sending another round of support worth $550 million to Ukraine to help the war-torn nation defeat Russian President Vladimir Putin.

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top