Montana Voters Reject Measure Requiring Care For Babies Born Alive | Eastern North Carolina Now | Montana voters opposed a midterm ballot measure imposing criminal charges on medical professionals failing to take “all medically appropriate and reasonable actions to preserve the life” of infants born alive, including those who survived after attempted abortions.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Brandon Drey.

    Montana voters opposed a midterm ballot measure imposing criminal charges on medical professionals failing to take "all medically appropriate and reasonable actions to preserve the life" of infants born alive, including those who survived after attempted abortions.

    LR-131, a legislative referendum known as the Montana Born-Alive Infant Protection Act, asked Montanans to decide whether "infants born alive, including infants born alive after an abortion, are legal persons." The measure would have also found healthcare providers guilty of failing to take medically appropriate and reasonable actions to preserve a born-alive infant's life, with a punishment of a fine up to $50,000 or imprisonment up to 20 years, or both.

    "A born-alive infant means an infant who breathes, has a beating heart, or has definite movement of voluntary muscles, after the complete expulsion or extraction from the mother," the referendum reads.

    Republican lawmakers and supporters of the measure said it would have protected babies that survived botched abortions, which studies suggest the failure rate of the medical abortion process is less than 1%.

    Rep. Matt Regier (R-Kalispell), who sponsored a bill last year that put the controversial measure on the ballot, told the House Judiciary Committee in January 2021 that it would define who Montanans are as a state.

    "This goes right down to, are we going to stand for life, or are we going to throw it away," Regier said.

    In an op-ed, Regier wrote, "A YES vote for LR 131 will do exactly what the title states - protect all infants that are born alive. This is different from the abortion debate. This law only affects medical providers intentionally allowing children born alive to perish."

    Montana resident Lea Bossler told the Montana Free Press that she lost her daughter 115 days after she was born prematurely from fetal inflammatory response syndrome. If the law had been in place, the medical staff involved would have been labeled criminals.

    "Her death under LR-131 would have been extremely traumatic for everyone, rather than beautiful," Bossler said. "Legally forced repeated chest compressions and epi shots would have done nothing but overdosed, bruised, and broken her already dying body."

    She added that the law would "infringe deeply on patient privacy, further restrict access to medical services, and eliminate infant palliative care and the human right to a dignified death, regardless of actual medical viability."

    Lauren Wilson of the Montana Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics told Montana Public Radio in a statement that the initiative would have "criminalized doctors, nurses, and other health care workers for providing compassionate care for infants, and, in doing so, overridden the decision-making of Montana parents."

    The Montana Free Press reports former Republican state Sen. Al Olszewski sponsored a born-alive bill in 2019 that was later vetoed. He said the bill would clarify that infants born-alive would have legal protections rather than to "go after children and families dealing with the tragedy of fetal abnormalities."

    Congress already passed a law twenty years ago that granted infants born alive the same rights as a person but did not require care or impose penalties on the medical staff, which led 18 other states to pass similar laws.

With Roe v Wade (originated in 1973) overturned by the US Supreme Court, thereby allowing decisions on abortion legislation completely returned to the states: Where do you find your position on such a "Life and Death" issue for the American People?
  Yes, I approve of the US Supreme Court's decision to reinstate this "medical" issue back to the states' legislative responsibility to regulate.
  No, I believe that every woman should have complete access to abortion on demand.
  This issue is far beyond my intellectual capacity to understand.
530 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

It has been far too many years since the Woke theology interlaced its canons within the fabric of the Indoctrination Realm, so it is nigh time to ask: Does this Representative Republic continue, as a functioning society of a self-governed people, by contending with the unusual, self absorbed dictates of the Woke, and their vast array of Victimhood scenarios?
  Yes, the Religion of Woke must continue; there are so many groups of underprivileged, underserved, a direct result of unrelenting Inequity; they deserve everything.
  No; the Woke fools must be toppled from their self-anointed pedestal; a functioning society of a good Constitutional people cannot withstand this level of "existential" favoritism as it exists now.
  I just observe; with this thoughtful observation: What will happen "when the Vikings are breeching our walls;" how do the Woke react?
338 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

Transgender-Identifying Teen Becomes First Male To Win A Miss America Sponsored Beauty Pageant Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Clueless Joe Takes Exactly The Wrong Message Out Of 2022 Midterms


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

We trust our readers to make their own conclusions. We'd love to hear what you think
A spokesman for Santa's Workshop today announced the organization's latest advance in their ongoing efforts to determine who's naughty and who's nice
demands federal government pays it to all, costing billions
Vice President Kamala Harris is spearheading a White House initiative to electrify the nation’s school buses, the administration announced Wednesday.
politization of leadership is biggest public concern
Twitter CEO Elon Musk said Monday that he will soon be releasing files on how the social media platform has engaged in suppressing free speech.
In the age of wokeness, ideological (re)education trumps mission-preparedness.
A new book alleges that after Ted Kennedy left his car and his passenger, Mary Jo Kopechne, in a pond off of Chappaquiddick Island, where Kopechne drowned, he returned to the party they had attended and told his close friends he wanted to say Kopechne was driving the car.
Hawaii’s largest active volcano began erupting Sunday night, with lava flow warnings issued to the surrounding area.


Back to Top