The Twitter Files Part V: Chinese Employee Warned Co-Workers Against Censoring Trump | Eastern NC Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Ryan Saavedra.

    The fifth installment of "The Twitter Files" focused on the actions inside of Twitter following the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol that ultimately resulted in former President Donald Trump being banned from the platform.

    Journalist Bari Weiss highlighted the two tweets that the president posted that day before getting banned:

2. 6:46 am: "The 75,000,000 great American Patriots who voted for me, AMERICA FIRST, and MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, will have a GIANT VOICE long into the future. They will not be disrespected or treated unfairly in any way, shape or form!!!" pic.twitter.com/7L252fqqK6

— Bari Weiss (@bariweiss) December 12, 2022

    The report noted that the company had resisted calls for years from internal and external sources to ban the president because Trump was an important part of the public conversation. Employees at the company note that they have "far stricter rules on effectively everyone else on the platform."

    As conversation grew inside the company, one employee said in the company's Slack channel, "Maybe because I am from China, I deeply understand how censorship can destroy the public conversation."

    The report continued by noting that some inside Twitter viewed Trump's reference to "American Patriots" as a reference to those who stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, many of whom have faced criminal prosecution, while others inside the company did not see Trump's tweet as a call to incite violence.

    Ultimately, officials at the company decided that the two tweets did not explicitly violate any of the company's policies.

    The report noted different world leaders that have explicitly called for violence on their accounts, but did not have their accounts removed.

    After Trump's two tweets were determined to not be a violation of the company's policies, Vijaya Gadde - Twitter's Head of Legal, Policy, and Trust - asked if the tweets could be coded in some way.

    Twitter's team then began to see Trump's mentioning of "American Patriots" as a reference which led them to view Trump as "the leader of a terrorist group."

    Weiss protected the identities of many inside Twitter who contributed to what was happening by blocking their names and account photos from inside the company Slack channel.

    Soon-to-be Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal said that the company needed to understand the ripple effects from its decision and that "centralized content moderation" had reached "a breaking point."

    The report then noted that numerous global leaders were stunned by the decision to ban Trump and even spoke out against it publicly.

poll#128

Where do you stand on the wanton censorship by Big Tech Platforms, while retaining their Section 230 carveout indemnifying them for Slander /Defamation lawsuits and Copyright infringements?

  Big Tech Platforms have the right to Censor all speech providing they voluntarily relinquish their Section 230 Carveout.

  Big Tech Platforms DO NOT have the right to Censor any speech, while retaining multiple indemnifications by virtue of the Section 230 Carveout.

  I know nothing of this 230 talk, but "I do love me some social media".

476 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

poll#147

Do you consider Election Integrity an issue of some real importance, or just another conspiracy theory interfering with Democratic Socialist political hegemony?

  No, complete access to everyone voting, even in a willy nilly manner, is more important than getting it right by limiting access to those that would commit Voter Fraud.

  Yes, the most inalienable right of real citizens of this Democratic Republic is the Right to Vote, and that right shall remain sacrosanct for perpetuity.

  Again, I don't vote and I don't care.

730 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

poll#157

Was it a judicious ploy for Joe Biden's FBI to execute the unprecedented raid of President Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate?

  Yes; the Cheneys despise this former Republican president, and for good reason ... so they say.

  No; never has a former president been treated with this level of vindictive abuse by those temporarily in power.

  Who cares? It's Trump.

932 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?