US Appeals Court rules Winterville traffic stop livestreaming ban could violate First Amendment | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    A federal Appeals Court panel has ruled that a Winterville police policy against livestreaming of traffic stops could violate the First Amendment. The ruling reverses a trial court decision favoring the town.

    A concurring opinion questions whether a livestreaming ban would present a clear-cut First Amendment violation. The concurring judge emphasized competing First and Fourth amendment issues.

    The full three-judge panel from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision that a police officer involved in the traffic stop could not be sued as an individual.

    Plaintiff Dijon Sharpe sued the Winterville Police Department and two officers after one officer, Myers Helms, tried to block Sharpe from streaming a traffic stop on Facebook Live in October 2018. Sharpe was a passenger in the car.

    "Officer Helms noticed this activity and attempted to take Sharpe's phone, reaching through Sharpe's open car window," wrote Judge Julius Richardson. "Officer Helms and his partner Officer William Ellis then told Sharpe he could record the stop but could not stream it to Facebook Live because that threatened officer safety. The officers also made it clear that if Sharpe tried to livestream a future police encounter, he would have his phone taken away or be arrested."

    Sharpe's suit targeted Winterville "for allegedly having a policy that prohibits recording and livestreaming public police interactions in violation of the First Amendment." A District Court judge rejected Sharpe's arguments about the town policy. The judge also ruled that qualified immunity barred Sharpe from suing Helms individually.

    "Sharpe plausibly alleges that the Town of Winterville has a policy preventing someone in a stopped vehicle from livestreaming their traffic stop," Richardson wrote. "If that policy exists, it reaches protected speech. So to survive First Amendment scrutiny, the Town needs to justify the alleged policy by proving it is tailored to weighty enough interests. The Town has not yet met that burden. So Sharpe's claim that the Town's livestreaming policy violates the First Amendment survives."

    Appellate judges agreed the case requires further action in a trial court.

    "Recording police encounters creates information that contributes to discussion about governmental affairs," Richardson wrote. "So too does livestreaming disseminate that information, often creating its own record. We thus hold that livestreaming a police traffic stop is speech protected by the First Amendment."

    Winterville should have a chance to defend its policies. "[T]he Town's speech regulation only survives First Amendment scrutiny if Defendants demonstrate that: (1) the Town has weighty enough interests at stake; (2) the policy furthers those interest; and (3) the policy is sufficiently tailored to furthering those interests," Richardson wrote.

    The town has argued for protecting police officers' safety. "This officer-safety interest might be enough to sustain the policy. But on this record we cannot yet tell," Richardson wrote. "There is 'undoubtedly a strong government interest' in officer safety. And risks to officers are particularly acute during traffic stops. But even though the Town has a strong interest in protecting its officers, Defendants have not done enough to show that this policy furthers or is tailored to that interest."

    U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff joined Richardson's opinion. Judge Paul Niemeyer agreed to send the case back to a trial court, but he wrote a concurring opinion.

    "[T]he majority opinion hardly acknowledges the role of the Fourth Amendment in the relevant analysis and the relationship of the Fourth Amendment to other constitutionally protected rights, including First Amendment rights," Niemeyer wrote. "Yet, the issues in this case arose in the context of a lawful Fourth Amendment seizure - a traffic stop - during which a person seized refused to obey the order of law enforcement officers to cease using a cell phone to communicate with others during the course of the stop."

    "The restriction on cell-phone use was thus an aspect of the seizure, and therefore the lawfulness of the restriction is regulated by the Fourth Amendment and its jurisprudence recognizing that, when conducting traffic stops, law enforcement officers may intrude on the liberty interests of those who have been stopped, so long as the intrusion is reasonable," he added.

    "The issue therefore should be restated, I submit, to whether, during a lawful traffic stop, law enforcement officers may lawfully prohibit the person detained from conducting electronic communications with others," Niemeyer explained. "This is a nuanced, but meaningful, adjustment to the issue addressed in the majority opinion, which is whether restrictions on electronic communications of persons detained are justified under a traditional, free-standing First Amendment analysis."

    The case Sharpe v. Winterville Police Department will return to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina.
Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

Democrats file “Parents’ and Students’ Bill of Rights” Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics One Democrat backs amendment making N.C. Board of Education members elected


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

South Carolina Republican Sen. Tim Scott announced his entry into the 2024 presidential election on Monday, smacking President Joe Biden while touting his own up-from-poverty story.
Amid incessant fears that Don Lemon may somehow find a way to return to his post at CNN, leadership at the satirical news organization took an unprecedented measure today and fired him for a second time, just to make sure.
One of the largest public state pension funds in the nation has routinely accepted shareholder resolution advice from a woke proxy advisory firm based in San Francisco
Special counsel John Durham‘s long-awaited report serves as a guide for how Congress can further investigate the Russiagate controversy, according to a top GOP lawmaker.
Local one year old Ryker Thomas has come under fire after appearing in blackface at his first birthday party.
Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) slammed ABC’s “The View” during a presidential campaign stop over the weekend in Iowa while announcing that he was going on the show this week.


Meta was slammed Monday by the European Union with a $1.3 billion fine and ordered to cease transferring user data to the United States over privacy concerns.
studies compare gender dysphoria patients for have surgery with those who have not
threatens cooling system of Europe's largest nuclear power plant
The NAACP Board of Directors issued a statement on Saturday warning black Americans that the state of Florida was not a safe place for them and included an official “travel advisory” calling the state “openly hostile” – but the board’s chairman, Leon Russell, apparently lives in Florida himself.


Children in grades K-3 in North Carolina have surpassed the rest of the nation when it comes to their early-literacy skills. That’s according to N.C. Superintendent of Public Instruction Catherine Truitt, who shared the news at Tuesday’s Council of State meeting.


Back to Top