SB 99: For Whose Benefit? | Eastern North Carolina Now

This week's Bad Bill of the Week is another repeat offender. SB 99, the North Carolina Benefit Corporation Act, is the same piece of legislation dubbed a "Bad Bill" by Civitas in 2011.

ENCNow
   Publisher's note: This post,by Brian Balfour, was originally published in the in Bad Bill of the Week section of Civitas's online edition.

    This week's Bad Bill of the Week is another repeat offender. SB 99, the North Carolina Benefit Corporation Act, is the same piece of legislation dubbed a "Bad Bill" by Civitas in 2011. This year's version is sponsored by Senators Peter Brunstetter (R-Forsyth) and Eleanor Kinnaird (D-Orange).

    For starters, the underlying premise of creating a "benefit corporation" is that traditional corporations and companies don't benefit the public. This notion, of course, is ludicrous. As Francis DeLuca noted in the 2011 Bad Bill summary: "A lawful, profitable business, by its very existence, already 'benefits' society...A business, by making a profit, increases the wealth of society and hence the ability of individuals to find employment and increase their standard of living. They also provide products and services that make our lives better."

    Moreover, upon reading SB 99 we discover how the state would evaluate whether or not a company is a "benefit corporation." According to the bill, "a benefit corporation shall have as one of its corporate purposes the creation of a general public benefit." The legislation defines "general public benefit" as: "A material positive impact on society and the environment, taken as a whole, as measured by a third-party standard." (Emphasis added.)

    This passage provides a major clue suggesting that SB 99 seeks to enforce the activities of companies according to certain standards of environmental impact and sustainability measures. And who provides this "third-party standard?"

    A non-profit group called "B-Lab" is the primary third-party evaluator of B-corporations. One of the perks of becoming a B-corporation is joining a network of other companies to take advantage of discounted services provided by other B-corporations (the list of members confirms B-Lab's mission of largely promoting "sustainability" measures). Over time, however, it would not be surprising if B-corporations begin to seek favored tax statuses as well.

    Oh, by the way, B-Lab doesn't appear to provide "third-party" approval for B-corporations out of the goodness of their hearts. According to this New York Times article, it can run up to $25,000 for a corporation to join the membership rolls of B-corporations.

    What a nice scam for the B-Lab folks: pressure state legislatures to enact laws recognizing B-corporations based upon your approval, then charge for that approval.

    If companies want to adjust how they spend their money or their "environmental impact," they should be free to do so and free to contract with consultants to evaluate and improve their efforts. There is no reason why legislation needs to interject itself into this process. It doesn't seem far-fetched to believe that this scheme was cooked up by B-Lab as an effort to use legislative authority to line their pockets. One also should be concerned with the use of legislative muscle to advance often highly questionable "sustainability" measures, as well as the potential for B-corporations to seek government privileges in the future. For these reasons, SB 99 is this week's Bad Bill of the Week.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Dear Commissioners, March 12, 2013 Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics John Droz, Jr.: A Most Important Energy / Environmental Message


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a foolish man, full of foolish and vapid ideas," former Governor Chris Christie complained.
Bureaucrats believe they set policy for spending taxpayer dollars usurping the directions of elected officials.
would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm
"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."

HbAD1

Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.
In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD2

 
Back to Top