Lipstick on a Pig - "Independent Redistricting Commissions" | Eastern NC Now

Senator Eleanor Kinnaird (D-Orange) is the lone sponsor of this week's Bad Bill of the Week - SB 155, The Hamilton C. Horton Jr. Independent Redistricting Commission. Senator Kinnaird sponsored a similar bill last year with the same name.

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: This post, by Susan Myrick, was originally published in the Bad Bill of the Week section of Civitas's online edition.

    Senator Eleanor Kinnaird (D-Orange) is the lone sponsor of this week's Bad Bill of the Week - SB 155, The Hamilton C. Horton Jr. Independent Redistricting Commission. Senator Kinnaird sponsored a similar bill last year with the same name.

    While Civitas remembers the late Senator Horton fondly, we are skeptical of all "non-partisan" or "independent" redistricting committees. We believe that redistricting is an inherently partisan process and should be transparently implemented by the elected officials charged with the responsibility by our State's Constitution.

    SB 155 (as do all "independent" redistricting bills) appears to pass off our elected officials redistricting responsibilities to appointees but, ultimately, the appointees are appointed by the politicians we elect to be in charge of the process. No amount of restrictions placed on who can and who cannot be appointed to the commission, and no matter how convoluted the appointment process, we know that in the end partisans will make the final decisions on the maps. We also know the system can be scammed. All we need to do is look to Arizona and California and their "independent" redistricting committees to see that these committees aren't what their proponents claim they are, but ultimately partisan cover for politicians.
This "picture is worth a thousand words:" Above.
    Commissions like the ones Senator Kinnaird proposes give cover to politicians not wanting to take the redistricting heat. There is little evidence that non-partisan and independent redistricting committees eliminate partisanship or political gerrymandering. It is impossible to take politics out of the redistricting process, instead we should insist on a transparent redistricting process. This will allow voters to determine whether the elected officials in charge followed all the rules and laws pertaining to the process.

    Because it shifts responsibility and accountability away from where it belongs, while not living up to the promise of being "independent," SB 155 is this week's Bad Bill of the Week.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Cyprus, The EU and Banks: The shape of things to come? Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Do We Need Certificate of Need?


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

ruling leaves congressional districts intact = huge blow to Spanberger
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD1

If you are covering Roy Cooper in Greensboro today, please consider the following statement from the Republican National Committee:
Obama and Biden judges abuse power for political reasons to try to stop Haitian deportations
teachers union rally held on major socialist / communist May Day holiday
Democrats foment climate of violence against Trump and GOP

HbAD2

 
 
Back to Top