Pork Wish Lists This Budget Season, Revealed | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Paige Terryberry.

    Special provisions continue to thrive in North Carolina. The last biennium budget was loaded with special projects, and the forthcoming one may be no different.

    These special provisions, also often called earmarks or pork spending, are spending projects not in support of core government services. They are pet projects for lawmakers with funding diverted to chosen areas for local items. No matter how suitable to a community these provisions might be, their funding at the state level is inappropriate. Pork spending undermines local authorities, agency grant processes, and private competition.

    Moreover, as Locke President Donald Bryson put it, "if the state government is spending money on things that are not core government functions, then it is taxing citizens beyond what is necessary."

    Once these pork spending projects make it into the budget, the names of the requestors are no longer attached to them. The John Locke Foundation has argued for greater transparency in the budget process. Enacting the Insko Rule would increase transparency and encourage responsibility by requiring each requesting member's name to be indicated with a special provision in the state budget.

    The charts below show the pork projects requested in bills filed during the current legislative session. The appropriation requests may or may not make it into a final budget. Right now, they are merely a wish list - but a list we can learn from.

    I have pulled the special provisions requested from individual bills from the onset of the current legislative session to May 6th. Below, I have divided the bills by party, member, and requesting member's district. The comprehensive list of pork can be found here.

    Democratic candidates requested to spend roughly 40% more than Republican candidates:

    North Carolina House members requested to spend roughly $270 million on pork projects, while state Senate members requested $293 million. Below see a breakdown by House and Senate members. If a bill requesting pork spending has multiple sponsors, the spending total of the bill is assigned to each sponsor.

    Looking at the pork spending by requesting members' districts was revealing as a surprising amount of districts received no pork spending requests at all. This underscores the political favoritism of pork projects, even if the projects themselves are for useful causes. State money should be spent for statewide projects.

Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

NC House passes bill to ‘fund students, not systems’ Statewide, John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Government, Op-Ed & Politics, State and Federal “Woke” Investing Hurts Small Farmers


Latest State and Federal

A ship that sank into the depths of Lake Michigan in 1881 has been discovered by shipwreck hunters, who described the ship as being like “a time capsule” into the past because of how well it has survived over the years.
Special counsel Jack Smith has asked the federal judge overseeing the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., to impose a “narrowly tailored” gag order on the former president
The total number of missing people from the devastating Maui wildfires last month remains near 400 even as Hawaii Governor Josh Green said that he believed the number would drop below 100.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said during an interview this week that he believes former President Barack Obama is the person who is running the Biden administration.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis bucked an offer from President Joe Biden this week to meet in Florida following Hurricane Idalia because the security protections that Biden would require would shut down recovery efforts.
Twenty-two state attorneys general, led by Tennessee’s Jonathan Skrmetti, are warning financial services companies that they may be violating antitrust and consumer protection laws by engaging in a climate activist alliance aimed at achieving net zero carbon emissions.
During the current period where COVID-19 cases are increasing, treatment is readily available and appropriate for the majority of North Carolinians.
Hunter Biden’s legal team on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against a former Trump White House staffer, accusing him of violating California and federal computer privacy laws by publishing thousands of photos and emails from the infamous laptop belonging to the president’s son.


Back to Top