Bill Barr On Trump J6 Indictment: ‘We’re Only Seeing The Tip Of The Iceberg’ | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Ryan Saavedra.

    Former Trump Attorney General William Barr weighed in on a federal grand jury charging former President Donald Trump with multiple felonies this week over his alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

    The 77-year-old former president was charged on Tuesday with conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.

    During an interview Wednesday night on CNN, Barr highlighted some potential problems with the case and the challenges it presents for the former president.

    Barr said it was a "legitimate case" but was complicated and could have "issues of proof."

    "There are some downsides to it. I think there were reasons not to bring it," he told host Kaitlan Collins. "I have said before I'm a little concerned about the slippery slope of criminalizing legitimate political activity."

HbAD0

    Barr said the Department of Justice would have a much harder time convincing the public that this case is fair and that the law is being applied equally because prosecutors "dropped the ball on the Hunter Biden investigation."

    Barr then addressed the argument from Trump and his allies after Collins pointed out that they are "saying he was just exercising his First Amendment right."

    "No, I really don't think that's a valid argument," Barr said. "As the indictment says, they're not attacking his First Amendment right. He can say whatever he wants. He can even lie. He can even tell people that the election was stolen, when he knew better. But that does not protect you from entering into a conspiracy. All conspiracies involve speech, and all fraud involves speech."

    Barr also discussed Trump listening to the advice of attorneys like John Eastman.

    "I don't think that dog is going to hunt," Barr said. "First, as to people who had some knowledge of whether or not there was fraud, everyone was telling him that the election was not stolen by fraud. ... He would search for a lawyer who would give him the advice he wanted. But I'm not even sure you would characterize what Eastman said as advice. I mean, it'd be interesting to see, but I interpret of some of what he was saying as essentially, 'well, you know, it's unclear here, and you could make this argument. I'm not saying the courts would accept it' and so forth."

    "And you act on that, it's your own hazard," he said. "Also, I don't think this defense of advice of counsel is going to go forward, because I think the president would have to get on the stand and subject himself to cross-examination in order to raise that. And he'd also have to waive attorney-client privilege."

    Barr said that he was positive that if Trump took the stand, he would do serious damage to himself from a legal perspective because a very skilled cross-examiner would grill him over "all the different versions of events he's given over the last few years."

    Barr cautioned that people need to wait before making up their minds about the case because "we're only seeing the tip of the iceberg on this indictment."

HbAD1

    When asked if he thought special counsel Jack Smith had "more" evidence that he was not showing, Barr responded, "Oh, yes. I would believe he has a lot more."

    Barr also said he believes that Trump knew that he lost the 2020 presidential election because of the public comments from some of his top outside political advisers at the time. They said "he was going to claim it was stolen if he was falling behind on election night, and that that was the plan of action," Barr said, adding, "That's my personal opinion."

poll#201
Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?
  Yes
  No
  Not sure
440 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?


poll#165
In light of continued developments, primarily since 2008, there exists in these United States a Legal System which operates on a proved Two Tiered approach to justice rendered, which primarily benefits Democratic Elites and Woke Ideological Virtue Signalers, representing their co-dependent wards, to the expressed exclusion of normal hardworking American citizens: What is your suggestion in remedying this widespread injustice and, if not corrected, its existential outcome for our Constitutional Republic?
  Complete overhaul of the Department of Justice and their enforcers - the FBI - to reflect a far more honest justice system to keep patriots remaining calm.
  Disband the FBI, and request that congress investigate all unethical and non patriotic practices to partially right the wrongs of a distrusted and politically weaponized "Department of Justice."
  Continue with the current system since the two tiered justice system has been so remarkably beneficial to Democratic Socialist political hegemony; chronic distrust in institutions notwithstanding.
674 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




World War II Hero Famous For ‘Airborne Beer’ Dead At 98 Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Portland Doctor Bloodied By Metal Bottle In Unprovoked Attack Slams City For ‘Defunding The Police’

HbAD2

 
Back to Top