Comments by Van Zant | Eastern NC Now

Browse all Comments by Van Zant...

ENCNow

Comments by Van Zant

Commented on Let's Get It Right!

My rep called me back. Not surprisingly, the School Board gave the Superintendent a contract extension and a perk package in this year when you guys closed an entire school. The vote was seven for the package and two against.
Commented: Sunday, June 29th, 2025 @ 10:26 pm By: Van Zant

Commented on Let's Get It Right!

Two things come to mind right off the bat:
1. If closing Snowden School was such a hard decision for you, why were you the one that initially made the motion to start the school closing procedure?
2. About those video-taped board meetings, I can't find any on the school site for 2025. I was looking this week-end cause I wanted to see how you guys voted on staff extensions and perk packages for upper staff this year. That's alright. I've gotten used to calling board members that respond to my questions, because even when the videos are up, they often times do not contain the results of votes made just after coming out of closed sessions.
Commented: Sunday, June 29th, 2025 @ 9:54 pm By: Van Zant
Our shrimpers have taken an important stand and set a great example for all of us trying to save our heritage. Thay said they would not take it anymore, and we all need to do that on EVERY important issue.
Commented: Sunday, June 29th, 2025 @ 11:53 am By: Van Zant
Truth does matter. Here are the facts:
1. Terry Williams voted to start the legal school closing process with his tentative vote to close S.W. Snowden School.
2. Terry Williams voted to not close S.W. Snowden School on the final vote.
The public can make their own determination about which vote carried the most weight in the events leading to the closing of Snowden School.
Commented: Wednesday, June 25th, 2025 @ 9:01 am By: Van Zant
We could keep supporting the present-day majorities, if we like higher and higher taxes, school closings, free money that is not free, and deals made behind the scenes. Or we could go in a different direction. What have we got to lose?
Commented: Tuesday, June 24th, 2025 @ 11:44 am By: Van Zant
North Carolina needs a credible Republican alternative to Tillis badly.
Commented: Friday, June 20th, 2025 @ 12:14 pm By: Van Zant
Sell out politicians like Phil Berger and all those that follow him are enemies of eastern counties need to be treated as such. The NCGOP continues to be out to lunch and should not expect our support. Think I'll write a check to Sam Page.
Commented: Friday, June 20th, 2025 @ 12:07 pm By: Van Zant
Whoops! I was referring to the Democrat Party SUPER delegates. LOL
Commented: Friday, June 13th, 2025 @ 2:18 pm By: Van Zant
The good news is the corrupt electronic voting has run its course. The bad news is there are still plenty of barriers to block the will of respectable people. In the meantime, we are stuck with a NC Republican Party running incompetent state elections, protecting shady powerful politicians, and a credibility gap as wide as the Grand Canyon. That's the NCGOP.

The Democrats aren't off the hook. A party with supper delegates held in reserve to undermine the will of legitimate primary voters can't say anything about anything.

Neither organized Republicans nor organized Democrats can claim any part of any high road.
Commented: Friday, June 13th, 2025 @ 8:44 am By: Van Zant
It's total abandonment. I imagine Richland Township had better figure this out on its own. I have no faith whatsoever in Beaufort County having any interest in the southeastern section beyond collecting the tax revenue from Nutrien.
Commented: Tuesday, June 10th, 2025 @ 9:46 pm By: Van Zant
I think it would be appropriate to add that while checking off the requirements of the statutes to follow the school closing procedure, many statutes were not adhered to or were used in a self-serving way just as stated in the article. It has been pointed out many times by one board member that particular aspects of the statutes have not been dealt with at all.
Commented: Sunday, June 8th, 2025 @ 8:43 am By: Van Zant
Obviously, an arbitrary decision to close Snowden was made, and then it was just a matter of checking off the lawful hearing requirements to get it done. Other than two or three board members, there was no one on the school board actually hearing the people. Most of them were just enduring the lawful process of closing the school after the despots had already made the decision.

Locally, the thing that has come out of this is that there is no local party acting as champions of the people, and not many individual board or commission members are giving the people anything other than lip service. I think we need to identify the ones that are listening and support them not worrying about party, race, or anything else. Maybe we need a local sub-party to counteract the established parties that are not listening to the people. I wonder how we could get that done.
Commented: Sunday, June 8th, 2025 @ 8:23 am By: Van Zant
The distinction most people are upset about has nothing to do with "exploring the possibility of closing Snowden." The problem comes with entwining that exploratory process with a formal school closing procedure. The public would stand for a study or hearings. The public would not stand a "study" or mandatory hearings to be checked off as part of a school closing process. That's what I'm hearing from lots of people, and I think they are right.
Thanks Stan - For not being a weasel.
Commented: Saturday, June 7th, 2025 @ 6:18 am By: Van Zant
For more enlightenment about the School Board, I looked up the vote on the motion on the TENTATIVE vote to close Snowden which was necessary in order to start the state process of closing Snowden School. Without this step there could not be final vote to close the school.

Donald Shreve (R) Made the motion to start the school closing process.
Daniel Hudson (R) Seconded the motion to start the school closing process.

Voted YES to start the process of closing Snowden School
T.W. Allen (R)
Eltha Booth (D)
Gary Carlton (R)
Daniel Hudson (R)
Donald Shreve (R)
Terry Williams (R)
Caroly Walker (R)

Voted NO to start the process of closing Snowden School
Stacey Davis (R)
Charles Hickman (R)

This should make things a lot clearer about the workings of the School Board. Still, it makes me wonder why some did what they did in the way they did it. Why would some provide a little cover for others. Then again, maybe they are just stupid.
Commented: Thursday, June 5th, 2025 @ 8:11 pm By: Van Zant
Stan: Ha, LMAO. Yeah, the Rs and Ds seem to mean very little. I suppose Randy Walker and Frankie Waters are opportunists that changed from D to R in order to get elected. I don't know what the deal is with the school board.

Previously, you mentioned what this says about the local GOP. No doubt they are a problem.
Commented: Wednesday, June 4th, 2025 @ 8:54 am By: Van Zant
This is the County Commission shoe (or should I say boot) that dropped on Snowden the night before.
Here's how the County Commission voted on the motion to appropriate &300,000 to save Snowden.

Voted NO to save Snowden:
Ed Booth (D)
Jerry Langley (D)
Randy Walker (R)
Frankie Waters (R)

Voted YES to save Snowden:
Stan Deatherage (R)
Tandy Dunn (R)
Hood Richardson (R)
Commented: Wednesday, June 4th, 2025 @ 6:16 am By: Van Zant
NO SPINE. I hear it went like this:
Daniel Hudson (R) Made motion to close Snowden
Do not know 2nd (R)

Voted YES:
T.W. Allen (R)
Eltha Booth (D)
Gary Carlton (R)
Daniel Hudson (R)
Donald Shreve (R)
Carolyn Walker (R)

Voted NO:
Stacey Davis (R)
Charles Hickman (R)
Terry Williams (R)
Commented: Tuesday, June 3rd, 2025 @ 10:35 pm By: Van Zant
CT: It's like the blind leading the blind.
Commented: Sunday, June 1st, 2025 @ 7:41 pm By: Van Zant
JS: I suspect you're on to something there.
Commented: Sunday, June 1st, 2025 @ 3:52 pm By: Van Zant
S.P.R.: You've made some very good points. Your take on the transportation report at the last regular school board meeting was spot on. The "report" did lack credibility. To me, it came over as an employee trying to please his boss with an advocacy speech and not as a legitimate report. Essentially, that is what it was.

The lack of legal counsel throughout all of this is another glaring deficiency. The school board continues to be ill served by legal counsel five or six counties away from our county.

The one meeting before the public in Aurora with the very long sales pitch monologue by the superintendent while the school board was hiding in the crowd was truly an insult to the residents of the southeastern part of Beaufort County.

Agreed, the Southside hearing was procedurally a huge improvement over the insulting excuse for a hearing at Snowden, although I was not impressed by the leadership turning the microphones off on speakers they did not want to hear while going on lengthy superficial bitch sessions themselves. Plenty of us did not appreciate any of that at our "hearing" where they did not seem to care about hearing from any of us beyond checking off another closing requirement on their checklist.

A great amount of planning and strategy was put into making sure the school board did not have to face a Richland Township crowd the likes of what attended in Aurora. We can give the Superintendent credit for that strategy. We can also cite the Beaufort County School Board as a whole for the actual responsibility of letting our citizens be treated in such a disrespectful manner.
Commented: Saturday, May 31st, 2025 @ 9:46 pm By: Van Zant
I do have concerns about the date, time and location issues around these hearings. I had a conversation with someone this morning about these details. He reminded me that the April 16th 'hearing' in Aurora started at 6pm, and working people were coming in even after six. In the meeting, the gymnasium was packed. Oddly this meeting was not with the Board of Education. It was with the Superintendent only.

The posted April 29th hearing at Chocowinity Primary School, the May 1st hearing at S.W. Snowden, and the May 5th hearing at Chocowinity Middle School were all cancelled.

The May 20th Board of Education meeting was rescheduled. Ironically, a prominent Aurora area citizen had changed his work travel schedule to be on the agenda for that meeting. The new date conflicted with the date he changed his schedule for. On the May 27th Board of Education meeting this persistent citizen did salvage a place on the agenda with a Zoom presentation from Texas.

The May 29th Board of Education meeting and 'hearing' at Southside High School was pretty well attended even though some working age Aurora people could not be there because of the time and place changes. I imagine the numerous cancellations were no help either. Even so, most if not all the crowd attending did not favor closing Snowden School. If some people did favor it, they were afraid to raise their hands. Additionally, the Board Chairman/Superintendent turned the microphones off on at least two of the speakers.

So, if the public thinks the BoE (Superintendent) hearing process is kind of skewed, perhaps they have legitimate reasons for coming to such a conclusion.
Commented: Saturday, May 31st, 2025 @ 11:23 am By: Van Zant
Don't get lost in the BS. Despite all the self-aggrandizing on his personal relations campaign, the Cheeseman record speaks for itself. The people that live here will be left with the mess.
Commented: Friday, May 30th, 2025 @ 6:33 am By: Van Zant
I attended the so-called 'hearing' at Southside High School last night. Congratulations Beaufort County School Board. They've joined the ranks of those, exposed on YouTube, fascist school boards that go on extended bickering personal rants, while turning off the microphones of people they do not want to hear. I can't remember if it was the board chairman or the board vice-chairman that tried to justify having the hearing outside Auroara by saying they already did one in Aurora. He forgot to mention that in the meeting in Aurora, the cowardly board was not facing the community. The Superintendent was handling that for them in Aurora. It really is shameful.
Commented: Friday, May 30th, 2025 @ 6:27 am By: Van Zant
CV: A lot of people I speak with are concerned about the hearing process. The two Washington schools to be closed have had no hearings. I've heard they may have them after the fact. That's wrong too. With Snowden the hearing process is sort of being done but in a very strange manner - shoddily done at the last minute. It's leaving a very bad taste and rightly so.

SD: You're right. Predictably, the local ruling coalition is getting set to lay all the blame for these fiascos in the making to be the fault of their chosen boogieman. People need to be paying close attention.
Commented: Thursday, May 29th, 2025 @ 3:06 pm By: Van Zant
After seeing the video of the BoE meeting on May 27th, I was very impressed by the presentations and passion from the speakers from Aurora. It would be heartless to pull the rug out from under those people now.
Commented: Thursday, May 29th, 2025 @ 11:07 am By: Van Zant
Speaking of kayfabe, I could swear I was hearing a Gordon Solie commentary during that commission meeting. Also, I do think the Snowden deal is done. Why else would the county manager incorporate that, so far officially undone, event in his proposed budget. Mind you, the backroom deal was done long ago between the School Super and County Commission Chairman. The only thing remaining to find out is if the School Board has any spine. So far it has consistently been 7 to 2 in favor of jello.
Commented: Thursday, May 29th, 2025 @ 6:54 am By: Van Zant
SD: Yeah, that's true. If that format does turn out to be the case, I would hope the public would ask specific board members some hard questions.
Commented: Wednesday, May 28th, 2025 @ 8:19 pm By: Van Zant
If I'm hearing this right the next 'hearing' is going to be more like a three-minute comment session directed at the board - more control freak stuff. I think at this point, and most likely afterwards too, this process is going to be ripe for legal action. Need to get in serious lawyer shopping mode.
Commented: Wednesday, May 28th, 2025 @ 5:23 pm By: Van Zant
The movement to consolidate schools is not favored by most citizens. Most citizens lucky enough to have a community school want to preserve it. Moving schools out of small communities, like Aurora, may well be an inconvenience to some, but to working families or broken families it could be devastating. Yesterday it was high school consolidations, then John A. Wilkenson entirely. Next will be the community schools in Chocowinity. On and on. We've seen the ivory tower studies that look more like sales brochures and the newspaper editorials wanting to consolidate into one or two county schools. One step leads to another step. Eventually, this type of movement will affect all of us. Then what? All of us do not have the option of homeschooling or paying for private schools. We're paying for public schools now. Are consolidation plans like this really trying to serve the public?
Commented: Monday, May 26th, 2025 @ 6:42 am By: Van Zant
RH: I agree, but I seriously doubt this particular board is going to add any responsibilities. They seem to like the easy path.
Commented: Friday, May 23rd, 2025 @ 8:32 am By: Van Zant
RL: You're right. Richland Township deserves better. Hood is right too. Wouldn't it have been so much better if the BCS Central office had given positive support to SWS rather than contributing to so much uncertainty for the future of Snowden. I think you call that self-fulfilled prophesy. That kind of thing is bad policy for Beaufort County. In the end Beaufort County families are the victims in all of this.
Commented: Friday, May 23rd, 2025 @ 8:24 am By: Van Zant
The costs, and in this case continuing costs, of consolidation could pay for keeping existing schools open. When consolidation is the goal what's happening now is kind of like killing two birds with one stone. Seems to me the county is getting snookered and the vast majority of our boards and commissions are in la la land or worse.
Commented: Thursday, May 22nd, 2025 @ 7:42 am By: Van Zant
It is incredible hearing the rhetorical pronouncements coming out of these international organizations (UN 2030 Agenda, and annual World Economic Forum) after their meetings. Immediately, high level politicians start parroting the language and pushing the concepts. Then state and local leaders join in. Next thing you know bureaucrats are telling us where to go, where to live and where our children have to go to school and what they have to learn. When any one of us question any of this, we are subjected to condescension and derision. Locally, over the last several decades, think how many times very bad decisions have been made that we are having to live with, pay for, and our children are being stuck with. It's really difficult to see where the agendas, stupid bungling, and crooked dealings start and end. It's really easy to see how many of these policies are harming our communities.
Commented: Tuesday, May 20th, 2025 @ 1:19 pm By: Van Zant
The question for me is, who was the president during the Biden term?
Commented: Sunday, May 18th, 2025 @ 9:30 am By: Van Zant
« Newer     Older »     

HbAD0

 
 
Back to Top