Least-Cost Electricity Is Critical for N.C. | Eastern North Carolina Now

“The fact of the matter is,” said Gov. Pat McCrory recently, “if we don’t have reasonable and reliable and low electric rates throughout North Carolina, we’re not going to be successful in having the Carolina Comeback throughout North Carolina.”

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Jon Sanders, who is Director of Regulatory Studies for the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

    RALEIGH     "The fact of the matter is," said Gov. Pat McCrory recently, "if we don't have reasonable and reliable and low electric rates throughout North Carolina, we're not going to be successful in having the Carolina Comeback throughout North Carolina."

    An official press release from McCrory's office stressed the importance of reliable, low electricity rates to the state's citizens and economy:

  • The lower electric rates this purchase should produce will save consumers money and make the region more attractive to job creators who want to take advantage of the region's talented work force and special quality of life.

    The governor was lauding the passage and signing into law of Senate Bill 305, which allows the North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency to sell its ownership in four power plants to Duke Energy Progress for $1.2 billion, reducing NCEMPA's $1.7 billion debt to $480 million.

    Since then another bill has come before the legislature that could save consumers money and attract job creators. House Bill 681, the NC Ratepayers Protection Act, could restore North Carolina's focus on utilities providing consumers with least-cost electricity.

    In North Carolina, electricity consumers have no choice in their electricity provider. In return for this guaranteed consumer base, the utility is expected to provide reliable power.

    The utility was also expected to provide the least-cost reliable power, but that dynamic changed when state leaders passed the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standards (REPS) mandate in 2007.

    Among other things, REPS mandates are notorious electricity price inflators:

    The Ratepayers Protection Act would do several things, including:

  • Ensure that all sources of electricity generation, including renewable sources, are options for utilities to fill their needs for reliable, sufficient power provision. This would not artificially limit any potential energy source, including solar and wind, from use if they are cost-competitive with other sources.
  • Apply the standard of least-cost mix of electricity generation to all energy sources.
  • Prevent the REPS surcharge on residential customers from nearly tripling, which is due to happen in July even as commercial and industrial customers' REPS surcharges stay the same.
  • Cap the REPS mandate at 6 percent and sunset it in 2018 (a hold-harmless provision would protect compliance costs incurred and purchase contracts made under the old REPS mandate).
  • Request a comprehensive study assessing known and measurable costs and benefits of distributed generation, including grid issues and standby generation issues associated with nondispatchable sources and unseen costs imposed by consumers not participating in net metering.

    The fourth point is crucial to keeping electricity rates low and the Carolina Comeback ongoing. It also satisfies Gov. McCrory's desire for a clear date in the near future to end the subsidies while protecting investors. As McCrory told WPTF's Bill LuMaye last August:

  • I think it ought to be a systematic shutoff of what type of energy should be subsidized, and there should be a clear rollout plan of when those subsidies stop. I did not agree with immediately cutting it off with no warning to investors who are investing in solar or wind or other types of power, but I do believe there has to be a date in which we do shut it off, and it's got to be a clear date probably not within a long period of time from right now.

    A very recent study estimated that the REPS mandate already has increased electricity costs in North Carolina by $276 million. The bulk of those costs are concentrated on commercial electricity consumers and residential consumers, and significantly less on industrial consumers.

    This departure from least-cost electricity will get worse in a hurry as the REPS mandate quickly rises. Until this year the higher power costs were under the lower initial mandate of 3 percent. This year it doubled to 6 percent; by 2021 it will be 12.5 percent.

    State leaders should never lose sight of the fact that the most important issue with electricity for the vast majority of North Carolinians is least-cost power available at the flip of the switch.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )



Comment

( April 25th, 2015 @ 8:27 am )
 
This is an example of legislative confusion.

We saw it with deregulation of the phone system. What was meant to open doors to competition actually complicated things for the Bell System to accommodate the newbies to telecommunication. Long haul---rates have gone up in telecommunication!

ALL UTILITIES have to serve a mass of citizens in a given territory. What is the problem with allowing large servers of the public to offer input and keep them within reasonable profit ranges?

Banks serve the public. That segment is now down to a few major players buying their competition hand over fist each year. At some point a wise MIDDLE GROUND should be sought balancing honesty and public need. All corps get to keep 2 sets of books (legally). The one that the IRS sees shows much red ink / the one the investor sees show glowing profit and progress. Somewhere in between is TRUTH!



Federal Justices Unsure About N.C. Districts Related to State, Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Commissioner Hood Richardson States the Correct Case


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a foolish man, full of foolish and vapid ideas," former Governor Chris Christie complained.
Bureaucrats believe they set policy for spending taxpayer dollars usurping the directions of elected officials.

HbAD1

would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm
"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."
Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.

HbAD2

In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD3

 
Back to Top