Time for Accountability 2.0 | Eastern NC Now

Accountability — and our outdated concept of it — is a topic Andy Smarick of the Fordham Institute artfully explores in recent blog post “Public Accountability vs. Consumer Accountability”.

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: This post, by Bob Luebke, was originally published in the Civitas's online edition.

    Accountability - and our outdated concept of it - is a topic Andy Smarick of the Fordham Institute artfully explores in recent blog post "Public Accountability vs. Consumer Accountability".

    Too often the standard default mechanism for the public is to require a single government-controlled entity to oversee all schools in a given area. Other types of schools - many of which receive public funds like charter schools, voucher schools or virtual - are unwittingly placed into the same accountability system and expected to perform the same way and meet the same metrics; even when many of these schools are demonstrably different academically and administratively from the uniform public school and expected to meet the same goals and metrics. Such a system has many shortcomings, and Smarick insightfully describes them and then raises the ultimate question: How do we pivot to a better system?

Smarick writes:

  • So maybe our state accountability systems all look alike and behave in ways we don't like because our century-old delivery system has forced their hands, not because policy leaders are uncreative, stubborn, or unwise.
  • If this is the case, it stands to reason that a different approach to school delivery-one with great diversity of schools and operators and directed by parental choice-could allow, support, or even beget a new approach to accountability.
  • Maybe we wouldn't need accountability systems to be uniform and statewide. Maybe schools could be held accountable through a wide array of measures that could vary from school to school. Maybe school report cards would become information-rich and user-friendly and help families make choices. Maybe all schools could be freed from burdensome rules. Maybe failing schools and operators could be replaced.
  • If only there were places in America that had school and operator diversity and widespread school choice; then, maybe, we could think anew about accountability.

    The argument for school choice, also argues for a variety of public - non-governmental - accountability mechanisms. Parent groups, professional associations, policy and civic associations, neighborhood organizations are all well-suited to contribute to this ongoing experiment of self-governance - if we would only let them.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




New Study: Renewable Energy Mandates to Cost NC Thousands of Jobs Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics NC State Continues to Defend Unconstitutional Policy


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
Democrat-run states have said they won’t send official delegations to the country’s 250th birthday bash
The North Carolina House unanimously passed the “Dominique Moody Safety Act,” advancing a child-welfare reform package named for the six-year-old girl whose death exposed repeated failures by Mecklenburg County social services officials to act on reports of abuse and neglect.
Maybe a holiday for Texas, but NOT the nation

HbAD1

government agencies refused to help on fear of being called "racist"
targets data centers and intermittent electricity sources

HbAD2

5 year sentence for failing to cooperate with surveillance of cit citizens
"He is fully fit to carry out all duties of the Commander-in-Chief and Head of State."

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top