Voter ID Still Not Required in 2020. Here’s Why | Eastern North Carolina Now

Yes, the N.C. Court of Appeals just upheld the state’s voter ID constitutional amendment.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is Kari Travis.

Photo: Don Carrington / Carolina Journal

    Yes, the N.C. Court of Appeals just upheld the state's voter ID constitutional amendment. But no, you won't have to show your ID when you head to the polls this year.

    In a 2-1 decision Tuesday, Sept. 15, the Court of Appeals overturned a lower court's rejection of a voter ID amendment in NAACP v. Moore. The decision also reinstated a voter-approved amendment capping the state's income tax rate. Both amendments — approved by voters in 2018 — were contested the following year in a trial court, where a judge ruled an illegally gerrymandered legislature had no power to place constitutional amendments on the ballot in 2018.

    That argument doesn't apply, two of the three appellate judges said Tuesday. In short, voter ID remains part of the state's constitution, as amended by voters.

    Some activists jumped on social media to praise the decision.

    "Hallelujah!" wrote one Twitter user. "The people of NC win! #VoterID"

    Not quite. At least, not yet.

    In February, another voter ID lawsuit, Holmes v. Moore, generated a separate ruling from the Court of Appeals. In that case, judges temporarily banned a law implementing voter ID in North Carolina elections. That ban was part of an interlocutory appeal, meaning the plaintiffs in the case couldn't get a temporary injunction from the trial court handling the lawsuit, so it asked the Court of Appeals for one. The appellate court provided the injunction and returned the case to the lower court.

    If it sounds confusing, it's because it is. Even so, that case remains in flux. And the law implementing voter ID rules is blocked. Indefinitely.

    In the meantime, voters "will not be required to show photo ID for elections held in 2020," Pat Gannon, a spokesman for the N.C. State Board of Elections, told Carolina Journal.

    NAACP v. Moore will head to the N.C. Supreme Court, where Democrats hold a 6-1 majority. Three seats on the high court, including the chief justice's seat, are being contested in the 2020 election.

    "Voter ID just became the most important issue in the N.C. Supreme Court campaigns," Brent Woodcox, an attorney for legislative Republicans, tweeted Tuesday.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




Demand to Reopen North Carolina Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Tillis, Trailing in Polls, Goes on Attack Mode in First U.S. Senate Debate


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

would allow civil lawsuit against judge if released criminal causes harm
"This highly provocative move was designed to interfere with our counter narco-terror operations."
Charlie Kirk, 31 years of age, who was renowned as one of the most important and influential college speakers /Leaders in many decades; founder of Turning Point USA, has been shot dead at Utah Valley University.
The Trump administration took actions against Harvard related to the anti-Israel protests that roiled its campus.
In remembrance of the day that will forever seer the concept of 'evil' in our minds, let's look back at that fateful morning, exactly 11 years ago today to that series of horrific events which unfolded before our unbelieving eyes......

HbAD1

faced 25 years in prison for "misgendering" a leftie tranny politician
illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic

HbAD2

 
Back to Top