Federal Judge Chides N.C. Elections Board, but Takes No Action | Beaufort County Now | A federal judge noted his “serious concerns” about the N.C. state elections board in an order issued Friday, Oct. 30. | carolina journal, federal judge, elections board, serious concerns, november 2, 2020

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Federal Judge Chides N.C. Elections Board, but Takes No Action

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.

    A federal judge noted his "serious concerns" about the N.C. state elections board in an order issued Friday, Oct. 30. But the judge denied legislative leaders' request to take action against the board.

    The new 19-page order represents U.S. District Judge William Osteen's latest pronouncement about rules governing N.C. elections. The order addresses concerns about elections officials' compliance with an earlier Osteen ruling. The judge had preserved state law's witness requirement for mailed-in absentee ballots. He also set limits on the types of ballot mistakes that could be "cured" by elections officials.

    Republican legislators presented evidence to Osteen that elections officials in at least two counties — Mecklenburg and Cumberland — have accepted absentee ballots without the legally required witness information.

    Osteen responded that his court could not address the issue. "Unfortunately, despite this court's serious and substantial concerns that the cure procedure used by the SBE does not comply with the statutory requirements, Legislative Defendants' motion for clarification is an inappropriate vehicle to address such concerns."

    "Though it frustrates this court, ... that the SBE seems to be permitting county boards to accept and process ballots for counting without ever obtaining the information required by statute, the basis of any injunction this court might issue here would not be grounded in a federal Due Process violation," the judge wrote.

    Court precedent "appears to counsel that these issues are matters for the state and state courts to address," Osteen concluded.

    "[T]he denial of relief should not be misconstrued as this court's approval of the actions of the North Carolina State Board of Elections," Osteen warned. "To the contrary, for the second time in this case,this court has serious concerns about the conduct of the North Carolina State Board of Elections."

    "[B]ased on the evidence presented, this court finds that the State Board of Elections is permitting at least two county boards of elections to undermine and contravene the requirements of the law of the state of North Carolina," he wrote.

    Senate leader Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, responded to the latest Osteen order.

    "When [Gov.] Roy Cooper took extraordinary measures to ensure his absolute control of the elections process, concerns were expressed about what that would mean when it came time for his partisan appointees to administer Cooper's re-election contest," Berger said in a prepared statement. "Now we know — they will cut corners, bend rules, and ignore judicial findings. Today Gov. Cooper's hand-picked Board of Elections was again rebuked by a federal judge, this time for accepting as valid absentee ballots that clearly violate witness requirements in North Carolina law.

    "The Board continues to flagrantly violate election rules that bipartisan supermajorities in the legislature passed many months ago. The Board must immediately correct course and fully implement the absentee ballot witness requirement to ensure confidence that our election process is being administered fairly and consistent with the law. Legitimate questions are being raised about what this may mean when they actually start counting ballots."


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Judicial Watch’s Twitter account was purged of nearly 200,000 followers, and I’ve lost over 10 percent of my followers.
Mary Kay Linge writes for the New York Post about one U.S. senator’s interesting take on the second impeachment of Donald Trump.
Yes, it’s January, not June, and you may feel as if you’re finally settling into a routine during a challenging school year.
The Supreme Court tossed two lawsuits accusing former President Donald Trump of violating the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution on Monday, ending a roughly four-year legal battle over the former president’s businesses.
Commissioners Vote To Keep Budget Deliberations Away From the Public
Bars that had their liquor licenses suspended due to COVID-19 shutdowns may have gotten a reprieve, thanks to a deal announced by the head of the House ABC Committee and the chairman of the state ABC Commission.
Nancy Murdoch examines information on the Covid 19 vaccine


So much is made of the Cancel Culture, which is as real as Trump Derangement Syndrome; however, the Impeachment Culture, as an offshoot of this Cancel Culture, has NOW won the day for the religiously Woke.
Although Twitter had not taken large-scale action against popular Antifa Twitter accounts during President Trump’s tenure, allowing Antifa more latitude to organize their efforts at creating chaos, this week, after President Biden was inaugurated, Twitter suspended some of those Antifa-related accou
Biden caught on camera admitting he does not know what he is signing, but does so anyway
Now that President Biden has been sworn in as the 46th president, he wants to hit the ground running and attend to urgent priorities.
Brittany Bernstein of National Review Online highlights one disappointing opening-day action from the new Biden administration.
Is the “Jet Pack Guy” who has been spotted several times flying miles in the sky near Los Angeles airport really a “guy”? Or is it just a drone dressed up to look like a guy?
The fall 2020 semester did not go as planned for most students and many felt that their universities failed them.
Ross Marchand writes for the Martin Center about the new president’s approach to higher education policy.


Back to Top