Parler Controversy Takes in Free Speech and Free Market Questions | Beaufort County Now | Some don't understand the meaning of either.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Parler Controversy Takes in Free Speech and Free Market Questions

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the LifeZette. The author of this post is David Kamioner.

    Many people seem to misunderstand the First Amendment and freedom of speech in regards to Parler and Twitter, not to mention their misunderstanding of the basic tenets of the free market.

    There are those who believe Parler losing business partners and Twitter denying Donald Trump a forum are frightening and egregious violations of the First Amendment. I don't think that is the case at all.

    The First Amendment gives you the right as an individual to personally say what you like, when you like, on most topics. Obviously there are some restrictions like national security, slander, public safety, inciting a riot, etc. What it doesn't do is give you the right to use FREE social media platforms run by private companies to say whatever you desire any time you wish on their dime and space.

    It also does not give you the right to be published by private firms at your own discretion. Some people, who may call themselves fans of the free market, do not comprehend the concept of private property.

    On the free market side of the question, writer Emily Nunez said, "If you don't think Government can shut down business because of covid or mandate them to enforce procedures...But you do think Government can force social media companies to keep accounts that they don't you really understand property rights?"

    Thus it is interesting to hear sunshine capitalists, weekend conservatives, and part time free marketeers who believe in the sanctity of the private sector, except when private firms do things they don't like. Then they become out and out socialists, demanding the state punish a firm for daring not to do their bidding. Ah yes, freedom for me, but not for thee, they say. Not exactly consistent.

    Yes, the times are perilous. But that does not excuse a situational application of free market principles. Remember the cake controversy in Colorado in 2018? A bakery turned away customers it didn't want to serve, customers whose service desires would violate the bakers' personal beliefs. I would venture to guess many conservatives agreed with the view of the bakery. I did. But now some of those same conservatives want to use the government, as they didn't in the cake case, to force clients upon the private sector? Still not consistent.

    There is also a Chicken Little school on this question that apparently believes there was no free speech in this country before Twitter, as the loss of the use of Twitter or Parler seems to tell certain people that free speech is almost gone.

    They also seem to think when a free service of a private company bans you from using their product, that is also the end of free speech. Though strangely, those reading this who disagree with me will have the opportunity to say it right here in the comments section or on many different other platforms. But obviously, free speech is nearing death. It's nearing death just like Trump will be inaugurated on January 20th and the president really helped the campaign in Georgia.
Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Hundreds of thousands take to streets today in France and Germany, clash with police
After 30 years of service, I was ready to retire when I heard about an opening at a small Christian college in Kentucky, I applied for the position of academic vice president and was hired.
Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a motion for summary judgment asking aCalifornia court to rule that the State’s quota for women on corporate boards is unconstitutional and to permanently enjoin any expenditure of taxpayer funds on the quota.
Meanwhile, our "Follow The Science" Governor prepares for passports
The organization’s commissioner, Que Tucker, tells media that she believes the bill is the product of racism.
Momentum grows as Ted Budd eliminates fundraising disadvantage six months ahead of schedule
John Kruzel writes for The Hill about one U.S. Supreme Court justice’s apparent frustration.
Charles Cooke of National Review Online pans the president’s response to a recent increase in crime.


The following statement was issued by Ford Porter, Spokesman for Governor Cooper, on energy legislation being considered in the NC House today
Estimates from the Senate budget proposal’s tax cut plan project a tax savings of roughly $13.9 billion over the next five years.
The Republican Party has experienced a sea change when it comes to China.
My research brief today answers nine questions about the remarkably “unremarkable” Certificate of Need (CON) law case just decided in the N.C. Court of Appeals.
Today, Governor Roy Cooper visited a vaccine clinic at Northwest Cabarrus High School today to see students and members of the community receive their vaccine.
On Thursday, a New York judge sentenced former lawyer Michael Avenatti to 30 months in prison, after Avenatti attempted to extort Nike of up to $25 million.
Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson in March announced the launch of a task force to address growing concern grew among public school parents about political and cultural indoctrination in the classroom


Back to Top