Parler Controversy Takes in Free Speech and Free Market Questions | Beaufort County Now | Some don't understand the meaning of either. | lifezette, parler, controversy, free speech, free market, questions, january 11, 2021

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Parler Controversy Takes in Free Speech and Free Market Questions

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the LifeZette. The author of this post is David Kamioner.

    Many people seem to misunderstand the First Amendment and freedom of speech in regards to Parler and Twitter, not to mention their misunderstanding of the basic tenets of the free market.

    There are those who believe Parler losing business partners and Twitter denying Donald Trump a forum are frightening and egregious violations of the First Amendment. I don't think that is the case at all.

    The First Amendment gives you the right as an individual to personally say what you like, when you like, on most topics. Obviously there are some restrictions like national security, slander, public safety, inciting a riot, etc. What it doesn't do is give you the right to use FREE social media platforms run by private companies to say whatever you desire any time you wish on their dime and space.

    It also does not give you the right to be published by private firms at your own discretion. Some people, who may call themselves fans of the free market, do not comprehend the concept of private property.

    On the free market side of the question, writer Emily Nunez said, "If you don't think Government can shut down business because of covid or mandate them to enforce procedures...But you do think Government can force social media companies to keep accounts that they don't you really understand property rights?"

    Thus it is interesting to hear sunshine capitalists, weekend conservatives, and part time free marketeers who believe in the sanctity of the private sector, except when private firms do things they don't like. Then they become out and out socialists, demanding the state punish a firm for daring not to do their bidding. Ah yes, freedom for me, but not for thee, they say. Not exactly consistent.

    Yes, the times are perilous. But that does not excuse a situational application of free market principles. Remember the cake controversy in Colorado in 2018? A bakery turned away customers it didn't want to serve, customers whose service desires would violate the bakers' personal beliefs. I would venture to guess many conservatives agreed with the view of the bakery. I did. But now some of those same conservatives want to use the government, as they didn't in the cake case, to force clients upon the private sector? Still not consistent.

    There is also a Chicken Little school on this question that apparently believes there was no free speech in this country before Twitter, as the loss of the use of Twitter or Parler seems to tell certain people that free speech is almost gone.

    They also seem to think when a free service of a private company bans you from using their product, that is also the end of free speech. Though strangely, those reading this who disagree with me will have the opportunity to say it right here in the comments section or on many different other platforms. But obviously, free speech is nearing death. It's nearing death just like Trump will be inaugurated on January 20th and the president really helped the campaign in Georgia.


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Editors at National Review Online explain why Democrats in Congress should drop one of their bad ideas.
Public school teachers in North Carolina receive an average annual salary of $53,392 for the current school year, according to the latest figures from the N.C. Department of Public Instruction.
The University of Notre Dame joined a growing list of universities that are requiring students to be vaccinated against COVID-19 in order to return to campus for classes in the fall.
Most people are generally aware that the Chinese are attempting to take over the United States in a variety of different ways, most of which are economic and military.
We will offer this allotment of three with more to come; some old, most new, but all quite informative, and, moreover, necessary to understanding that in North Carolina, there is a wiser path to govern ourselves and our People.
Judicial Watch today released a transcript of the March 24 oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit challenging a lower court ruling upholding the secrecy of controversial secretly-issued congressional subpoenas
At this time, by their every action, word and eventual deed of the Leftist Socialist non patriots, it is fully clear that this 2020 General Election was a coordinated effort to defraud the non Socialist electorate by colluding with multiple interested parties to create The Big Cheat of 2020.


Gov. Roy Cooper on Friday, April 9, signed two bills into law designed to help students who lost more than a year of in-person learning because of the pandemic and subsequent lockdowns.
Come with us as we gaze into the Looking Glass for answers that most ignore or simply can't see.
David Drucker of the Washington Examiner highlights a political fault line exposed by Georgia’s new voting law.
Graham Piro of the Washington Free Beacon reports on labor unions’ response to the president’s bloated infrastructure package.
There is a known revolutionary in the NCAE. Does this frighten you? It should, and here's why!


Back to Top