Supreme Court’s Division on Lockdowns Causes Concern

Latest Polls (view all)

Where do you stand on the Transgender Issue now that the issue has gotten to the overt point of the open celebration of this lifestyle choice, dictated by certain direct and explicit actions.

91.07% I do not approve of behavior that has within its expressed tenants policies that harm children.

8.04% I do support the Trans Community in all its many facets because diversity is at a premium in today's society.

0.89% What is a "Children's Drag Queen Story Hour?"

Click Here to Vote
112 Vote(s)

View all Polls

Supreme Court’s Division on Lockdowns Causes Concern

Published: Sunday, February 14th, 2021 @ 9:13 pm
By: John Locke Foundation ( More Entries )

Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

Scott Street writes for the Federalist about potential implications of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision.

Like numerous judges across the country for the past year, some justices on the U.S. Supreme Court appear unable to put aside their political views and question the legality of lockdown orders. That's apparent in last week's late-night decision in the ongoing battle between California's churches and California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The order arose after Newsom ignored the Supreme Court's prior decision that found bans on indoor worshipping to violate the First Amendment.

Just one week after the Supreme Court issued that decision, Newsom's government issued a regional "stay at home" order that again banned all indoor church services during a sacred holiday season, but let grocery stores and large retailers like Costco and Best Buy stay open inside at 25 percent capacity. The order showed a shocking disregard for the law, particularly during the Holy Season and especially for a governor that has demanded complete fealty to his orders.

California must have known that it would be hauled back before the Supreme Court, and the court made it pay. Justice Neil Gorsuch's plurality opinion hammered that point, saying: "Recently, this Court made it abundantly clear that edicts like California's fail strict scrutiny and violate the Constitution ... Today's order should have been needless; the lower courts in these cases should have followed the extensive guidance this Court already gave."

Of course, one may expect such defiance from California politicians, whose state voted nearly two to one for Joe Biden over Donald Trump, but it is much scarier to see it come from three Supreme Court justices — Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Stephen Breyer — who discarded all respect for stare decisis and essentially accused their colleagues of killing people. ...

... Sadly, Kagan's dissent reflects a larger failure by the legal community during the COVID-19 pandemic: a failure to exercise any independent judgment or critical thought in the face of the greatest assault on civil liberties in modern American history.

Go Back

Login to Leave a Comment

Haley Makes Case for Protecting Women’s Sports

John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics

GOP Senator Suggests Impeaching Schumer

Our Members

ENCN Sign Up

BCN Home

Beaufort Observer

Portfolios

Current Events: A Historical Perspective

Current Weather

Latest Comments

Latest Polls

Featured Entries

Latest Entries

Supreme Court’s Division on Lockdowns Causes Concern | Eastern NC Now

Supreme Court’s Division on Lockdowns Causes Concern

Leave a Guest Comment

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

CA's Gov. Newsome facing federal investigation started under Biden, but blames Trump

student wins free speech case against Mecklenburg County NC Schools filed in federal court

GOP legislature passes NC Ratepayer Protection Act on electric rates

Taxes, Budgets, Spending, Are They Linked?

Overworked And Under Pressure Is Not A Path To Law And Order

UPDATE: Conservative Mike Collins wins Georgia GOP US Senate runoff

Biden DOJ targeted parents at school board meetings despite objections from FBI and sheriffs

Truth for our times: Bills Return America has addressed, the case made, and other legislation being monitored

Poland says "Hell, NO" to EU migrant resettlement scheme; Belfast anti-migrant riots continue

Tulsi Gabbard releases documents on US funded gain of function research at foreign labs

CEO of major Democrat funding group ActBlue pleads the 5th on election finance frauds

Creative new term limits bill introduced by Congressman Chip Roy with 12 year limit

What is the nuclear family and its significance in society?

The British police state: bill to jail tech CEOs who refuse to spy on everyone's cell phone

White House Doctor Announces Results Of Trump’s Annual Physical

Riots sweep Belfast after African migrant attempts to behead a local man in random attack

Illegal alien migrants behaving badly - migrants and crime NEWLY UPDATED

The JAIL Act: cracking down on soft-on-crime judges

new report: Minnesota Dems knew about mass Somali fraud but refused to do anything about it

Investigative reporter Nick Shirley finds 126 year old California voter,

UK top Labour leader says all ethnic groups should NOT be treated the same by police

EXCLUSIVE: State Department Organizing Global Push Against Far-Left Terror

Obama judge opens US immigration to migrants from 38 terrorist infected countries

Will California's crooked election system produce crooked results this year? Fed probe launched

It was my war

The ‘90s Childhood Comeback

A Pro-Life Cause Deserves a Prudent Strategy