Court blocks Biden Administration from doling out grants based on race, gender | Beaufort County Now | Sound ruling, finally

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Zachary Stieber, writing at the Epoch Times reports:

A federal judge in Texas this week blocked the Biden administration from distributing grants in a COVID-19 restaurant relief program that prioritizes applicants by their race or gender.

U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor, a George W. Bush nominee, said he believes plaintiff Philip Greer, a cafe owner, is likely to succeed in his lawsuit against the Small Business Association as he granted a request for a temporary restraining order (TRO).

“Based on the record, Greer is ‘able and ready’ to apply; he has prepared an application on behalf of his restaurant and is otherwise eligible to receive an RRF grant, but for the allegedly unconstitutional prioritization scheme preventing his application from being processed,” O’Connor said in his 18-page decision.

If Greer’s lawsuit is ultimately won, then there’s a substantial likelihood that he could receive a portion of the funds from the Restaurant Revitalization Fund, a $28.6 billion pool created by the latest COVID-19 relief package, the judge added.

At issue is the fact the package directs the Biden administration to prioritize restaurants that are owned and controlled by women, veterans, and people deemed “socially and economically disadvantaged,” which includes those owned at least 51 percent by some Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations.

The SBA, which is deciding among applicants, announced that it would accept applications from all eligible applicants but only process those from a “priority group” in the first 21 days.

Greer argued that the policy actively excludes entire classes of Americans not mentioned in the “priority” group who are also suffering significant financial losses caused by the pandemic.

“The Small Business Administration lurches America dangerously backward, reversing the clock on American progress, and violating our most sacred and revered principles by actively and invidiously discriminating against American citizens solely based upon their race and sex. This is illegal, it is unconstitutional, it is wrong, and it must stop,” his lawsuit states.

Attorneys for Isabella Guzman, the administration’s administrator, asserted in a response to the motion for a TRO that Greer lacked standing because he didn’t actually submit an application for a grant. They also said he hadn’t suffered an injury that was traceable to the priority period.

The lawyers also argued the prioritizations adopted, while being “race-conscious,” don’t violate the constitutional guarantee of equal protection.

O’Connor, the judge, shot down those claims.

“The context is clear: the evidence that Greer’s restaurant lost nearly $100,000 in gross revenue during the COVID-19 pandemic and [his] attestation that he has prepared an application and is otherwise eligible are sufficient to suggest Plaintiffs’ ‘actual desire’ to apply for a monetary grant with the specific goal of supporting restaurants during the pandemic—like Greer’s,” he wrote.

An attorney for the Biden administration didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.

Stephen Miller, president of America First Legal, which is representing the plaintiff, said in a statement: “The facts of the case are straightforward: hard-hit American restaurant owners can apply for urgently-needed pandemic relief. But the government puts some owners at the back of the line for access to a limited pool of money based on their race. So we are presented with a simple but vital question: can the government reward or punish American citizens based upon the color of their skin or the ancestry of their families?

“We all know the answer. Racial discrimination, in any form, is legally and morally wrong. It is un-American. It is unconscionable. And it must be stopped.”

The judge directed Greer to apply for a grant on or before May 19 while enjoining Guzman and the agency she oversees from processing and considering the grants.

A hearing will be held on May 24 at 9 a.m. in the case.

Go Back


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The N.C. Court of Appeals has affirmed state regulators’ ruling against a proposed solar energy plant for North Carolina.
There are so many more like these but it is mostly the "bad apples" we hear about
In conversations about record inflation, most people harken back to the Jimmy Carter era where annual price inflation growth surpassed 10%.
A school district in Michigan has not only canceled Halloween ahead of October 31, but also gone ahead and canceled Valentine’s Day, which is still four months away.
Don't you think it's time for conservative county government?
North Carolina set another record for new business creation in 2021.


The first time crime really hit home for me was when a thug pointed a gun at a family member’s head while she was making an after-hours bank transaction.
Nicholas Curry just wrapped up his first semester at Appalachian State University. It’s a moment to celebrate for any student, but for Nicholas, the victory is particularly meaningful.
A leftist California politico who serves as co-president of the Global Forum on Modern Direct Democracy mocked Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s statements on abortion by stating the concept of “equity” demands parents give up their children to the state.
Last week, part-owner of the NBA’s Golden State Warriors, Chamath Palihapitiya, asserted that “ nobody cares ” about the Uyghur genocide happening at the hands of Chinese authorities.
Lawyers supporting and opposing North Carolina’s new election maps will take their arguments to the N.C. Supreme Court on Feb. 2.


Macron's Minister of Education issued order while vacationing in Spain


Back to Top