An analysis of NC Supreme Court decisions in the most recent term | Beaufort County Now | They agree much more than they disagree

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Mitch Kokai has an informative piece in the Carolina Journal  analyzing the rulings of the most recent term of the N. C. Supreme Court.  Bottom line:  The justices agree much more than they disagree, regardless of political party.  Mitch writes:

Those who expected a string of partisan 4-3 decisions from the N.C. Supreme Court this year might be disappointed. The court’s four Democratic justices have split with its three Republicans just two times in 76 case decided so far this year.

Yet a side-by-side comparison between this year’s high court rulings and those handed down in 2020 shows signs that the new court has seen a philosophical shift.

Voters sent a clear message in last year’s statewide judicial races. Republicans won all eight contests on the ballot, including three seats on the N.C. Supreme Court. The elections shifted the court’s partisan balance from 6-1 in favor of Democratic justices to a much closer 4-3 Democratic majority.

Just as important, perhaps, was the change in the chief justice’s chambers. Paul Newby, the lone Republican on the 2020 court, edged appointed Democrat Cheri Beasley by 401 votes out of nearly 5.4 million ballots cast statewide.

The 2020 court issued rulings in 173 cases. As is true in most years, the clear majority of decisions were unanimous. Some 113 cases (65%) produced no dissents. In 38 cases (22%), a single justice dissented. Another nine cases (5%) featured two justices disagreeing with the court’s majority. Eleven cases (6%) produced 4-3 splits. The court also stalemated 3-3 on one case, while a final case featured the six participating justices split into three pairs.

As the lone Republican, Newby also was the justice most likely to dissent. He voted with the majority in 76% of the cases. But he wrote 35 dissents, nearly twice as many as any other justice. (Anita Earls wrote 18. No one else on the court authored more than five.) Newby served as a case’s sole dissenter 23 times.

Now his role has changed. Newby has voted with the majority in 73 of 75 cases this year (discounting a 3-3 split). His 97.3% rate matches Democratic colleagues Sam Ervin IV and Michael Morgan for the highest percentage on the court. Like Newby, the court’s two new Republican justices — Tamara Barringer and Phil Berger Jr. — have dissented just twice. Their majority percentages are slightly lower only because they have not participated in every case.

In contrast, Democratic Justice Robin Hudson has dissented four times. Earls has dissented eight times, the most of any justice in 2021.

With a much closer partisan split, the 2021 court has issued unanimous opinions in 64 cases (84%). Another five cases (7%) have produced a single dissenter. In each of those instances, the lone dissenter has been a Democrat (Earls four times and Morgan once). One case has featured two dissenters (both Democrats). Five cases have produced 4-3 splits.

Of the 4-3 splits, only two cases have pitted the Democratic majority against the Republicans. One involved a dispute over termination of parental rights. The other, the State v. Corbett case decided March 12, featured a disagreement over granting a new trial to defendants convicted in a high-profile Davidson County murder case. The Democratic majority agreed to order the new trial.

In three other 4-3 splits, a single Democratic justice has joined with the three Republicans to form a majority. The April 12 State v. Meader case united the Republicans with Ervin. The four-justice majority agreed a criminal defendant had not put forward a convincing case that she was too intoxicated to take responsibility for her crime.

Last month Morgan joined the Republicans for 4-3 rulings in two cases. One dealt with parental rights. The other, State v. Hamer, foiled a driver’s attempt to use a legal technicality to win a new trial on a speeding charge.

There’s even more evidence that the current configuration of the N.C. Supreme Court features more unity than its 4-3 partisan makeup might suggest.

Newby has written five majority opinions this year. Each represented a unanimous court. Two deserve special recognition.

In Deminski v. State Board of Education, Newby wrote for a united court that local school boards could face lawsuits for failing to take action against bullying and harassment of students. That decision overruled a 2-1 split on the N.C. Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court’s opinion in Deminski thus represented more than just a rubber stamp of lower courts’ work.

In another case with a Newby opinion, Cheryl Lloyd Humphrey Land Investment Company v. Resco Products, the Supreme Court overturned a decision from a unanimous three-judge Appeals Court panel. The case featured a lawsuit targeting owners of an Orange County quarry. Plaintiffs took legal action because of comments made during a local zoning hearing. Newby highlighted the constitutional right to petition government as his colleagues all agreed to toss the lawsuit.

Numbers and anecdotes both show that the November 2020 election has produced change on North Carolina’s highest court. But the picture is more complicated than a 4-3 partisan split might suggest.

Mitch Kokai is senior political analyst for the John Locke Foundation.


Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Two more Democrats have announced their plans to retire and not seek re-election in the 2022 midterms, potentially shrinking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) already slim majority.
Intercollegiate sports, particularly football and basketball, have ever so slowly, over the years, inserted themselves insidiously into the fabric of most universities with the support of alumni, the business community, and their college presidents.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said during Wednesday’s press briefing that John Kerry didn’t actually mean what he said when he claimed during an interview this week that President Joe Biden “literally” did not know what was happening with the recent crisis involving France.
So far this year, Gov. Cooper has pledged over $930.7 million in tax incentives to just 22 corporations, including $845.8 million over four decades to Apple
The Beaufort County Commissioners will get another bite at the patriotic apple, a fruit they far too often hold in great disdain, to pass this necessary resolution.
Marty Kotis said he was simply trying to start a public discussion when he proposed a motion related to anti-discrimination policies.

HbAD1

I have been following the Sheppard case and the Franks case the last couple of years with a somewhat dispassionate interest. The wheels of justice grind and they do grind slow.
On Wednesday, Dr. Elana Yaron Fishbein, the founder of the group No Left Turn in Education, blasted the Biden administration’s DOJ after the Biden Justice Department ordered the FBI to investigate alleged “threats” against school board members and teachers.
President Biden's numbers in the Tar Heel State are in the gutter. According to a recent High Point University poll, Biden's approval rating is at a lowly 35 percent.
Former N.C. congressman Mark Walker, a Republican candidate for the state’s open U.S. Senate seat in 2022, has taken numerous calls urging him to shift gears and try instead to return to the U.S. House.
Officials have admitted they are rounding up people who are virus-free as well as those reported infected, since infection is merely an excuse for shipping people to concentration camps.  
New polling from Pew Research Center appears to show that a slight majority of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents do not want former President Donald Trump to be the Republican Party’s nominee in 2024.

HbAD2

An involuntary recusal, in the teeth of a Justice’s own judgment that recusal is not necessary, is in effect a public declaration that the Justice has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top